Cited by 173Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Rumination, Worry, Cognitive Avoidance, and Behavioral Avoidance: Examination of Temporal Effects

Dickson, Kelsey S., Ciesla, Jeffrey A., Reilly, Laura C.·2012·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Recently, cross-sectional research has demonstrated that depressive rumination is significantly associated with the tendency to engage in cognitive and behavioral avoidance. This evidence suggests that rumination may be the result of attempts to avoid personally threatening thoughts, in a manner suggested by multiple contemporary theories of worry. This investigation examined the temporal relationship among daily levels of cognitive avoidance, behavioral avoidance, rumination, worry, and negative affect. Seventy-eight adolescents completed baseline questionnaires and then electronically completed daily measures of rumination, worry, behavioral avoidance, and cognitive avoidance, as well as sad and anxious affect for 7 days. Lagged-effect multilevel models indicated that increases in daily sadness were predicted by greater daily rumination and cognitive avoidance. Increases in daily anxiety were predicted by greater daily rumination, worry, and both cognitive and behavioral avoidance. Further, both daily rumination and worry were positively predicted by daily cognitive, but not behavioral, avoidance. Mediation analyses suggested that rumination mediated the effect of cognitive avoidance on both sadness and anxiety. Also, worry mediated the effect of cognitive avoidance on anxiety. Implications for models of avoidance, rumination, and worry are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2011.11.002

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickson, K. S., Ciesla, J. A., & Reilly, L. C.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ciesla, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
629-640
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054425464
Cited by
173
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
rumination, worry, cognitive avoidance, behavioral avoidance, negative affect, sadness, anxiety, adolescents, temporal dynamics, mediation, lagged effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review