Cited by 75Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Approach-Avoidance Conflict in Major Depressive Disorder: Congruent Neural Findings in Humans and Nonhuman Primates

Open access
Ironside, Maria, Amemori, Ken-ichi, McGrath, Callie L., Pedersen, Mads Lund, Kang, Min Su, Amemori, Satoko, Frank, Michael J., Graybiel, Ann M. +1 more·2020·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Maladaptive approach-avoidance behavior has been implicated in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), but the neural basis of these abnormalities in decision making remains unclear. Capitalizing on recent preclinical findings, we adapted an approach-avoidance conflict task from nonhuman primate research for use in human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Methods Forty-two female participants, including 18 unmedicated individuals with current MDD (mean age 25.2 ± 5.1 years) and 24 psychiatrically healthy control subjects (mean age 26.3 ± 7.6 years) completed the adapted approach-avoidance task during fMRI. To probe potential mechanistic factors underlying the observed behavioral and fMRI findings and to inform interpretation of putative group differences, we examined electrophysiological data from 2 female Macaca mulatta monkeys performing the approach-avoidance conflict task mimicked in the fMRI study.Results Findings demonstrated congruent neural correlates of approach-avoidance conflict and aversive responsiveness in the anterior cingulate cortex, including the pregenual cortex, of human subjects and macaques (humans: p < .05 whole-brain corrected; macaques: p < .05). The MDD group exhibited aberrant task-related activations in the anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, and striatum (all ps < .05). Neural effects in the MDD group were cross-sectionally associated with stress and depressive symptoms. Importantly, they also prospectively predicted stress at 6-month follow-up (all ps < .05).Conclusions Findings indicate that there is conservation of anterior cingulate activation across species and that frontal and striatal regions, in unmedicated humans with MDD, are abnormally responsive during cost-benefit decision making. We suggest that these disruptions could be valuable candidates for translational biomarkers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.022

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In MDD, reduced approach-related dlPFC activation correlated with increasing perceived stress.

    “In MDD, reduced approach-related dlPFC activation correlated with increasing perceived stress.”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Discussion reports reduced approach-related DLPFC activation in MDD. However, the correlation with higher perceived stress is reported for DLPFC activation during non-conflict trials, not specifically for approach-related activation (Results, Imaging Results; page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Relative to controls, unmedicated adults with MDD were less sensitive to reward.

    “Relative to controls, unmedicated adults with MDD were less sensitive to reward.”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Unmedicated adults with MDD showed reduced approach-related activation in the dlPFC and reduced avoidance-related pgACC activation.

    “Moreover, they showed reduced approach-related activation in the dlPFC and, surprisingly, reduced avoidance-related pgACC activation.”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

  • A region bordering area 32 within the pgACC of macaques is implicated in negative bias in decision making.

    “A region bordering area 32 within the pgACC of macaques [39] has also been implicated in negative bias in decision making using a task subsequently adapted to assess negative biases in MDD [42].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Train K (2003): Discrete Choice Models using Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ironside, M., Amemori, K.-I., McGrath, C. L., Pedersen, M. L., Kang, M. S., Amemori, S., Frank, M. J., Graybiel, A. M., & Pizzagalli, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Pizzagalli, Diego A.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
399-408
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971467968
Cited by
75
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research
  • Army Research Office
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • CHDI Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, approach-avoidance conflict, cost-benefit decision making, anterior cingulate cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, striatum, stress, translational biomarkers
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review