Cited by 46Personality Disorders and PsychopathologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dialectical behaviour therapy-informed skills training for deliberate self-harm: A controlled trial with 3-month follow-up data

Gibson, Jennifer, Booth, Richard, Davenport, John, Keogh, Karen, Owens, Tara·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for deliberate self-harm (DSH) and emerging evidence suggests DBT skills training alone may be a useful adaptation of the treatment. DBT skills are presumed to reduce maladaptive efforts to regulate emotional distress, such as DSH, by teaching adaptive methods of emotion regulation. However, the impact of DBT skills training on DSH and emotion regulation remains unclear. This study examined the Living Through Distress (LTD) programme, a DBT-informed skills group provided in an inpatient setting. Eighty-two adults presenting with DSH or Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) were offered places in LTD, in addition to their usual care. A further 21 clients on the waiting list for LTD were recruited as a treatment-as-usual (TAU) group. DSH, anxiety, depression, and emotion regulation were assessed at baseline and either post-intervention or 6 week follow-up. Greater reductions in the frequency of DSH and improvements in some aspects of emotion regulation were associated with completion of LTD, as compared with TAU. Improvements in DSH were maintained at 3 month follow-up. This suggests providing a brief intensive DBT-informed skills group may be a useful intervention for DSH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.06.007

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, J., Booth, R., Davenport, J., Keogh, K., & Owens, T.
Affiliations
  • St. Patrick's Hospital (IE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Jennifer
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
60
Pages
8-14
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035533198
Cited by
46
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
St Patrick's University Hospital
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, DBT skills training, self-harm, emotion regulation, borderline personality disorder, inpatient care, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review