Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Brief psychological interventions for anxiety and depression in a secondary care adult mental health service: an evaluation

Open access
Roberts, Kate, Travers-Hill, Emma, Coker, Siân, Troup, Jordan, Casey, Stephanie, Parkin, Katherine, Kim, Youngsuk·2021·The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

Abstract

Abstract Due to continuing pressures on the UK National Health Service’s mental health services, there has been increased interest in the development of brief psychological interventions (BPIs). These interventions are usually defined as including selected components of established psychological interventions, delivered over fewer sessions, and by staff with less specialised training (paraprofessionals). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based BPIs for anxiety and depression have been found to be helpful for clients with mild to moderate mental health problems. This project evaluates the introduction of BPIs for anxiety and depression in a secondary care adult mental health service, with clients experiencing moderate to severe mental health difficulties. The service developed CBT-based manuals for anxiety (anxiety management) and depression (behavioural activation) BPIs. The BPIs were delivered by mental health workers without core therapeutic training, who were offered training and group supervision by psychologists in the team. Measures of anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), wellbeing (SWEMWBS) and functioning (WSAS) were completed at the start and end of treatment. The data reported from a 2-year period suggest that BPIs are associated with reductions in symptoms of anxiety and low mood, and improvements in wellbeing and functioning. Whilst this is a small-scale initial evaluation, the results are promising for the potential benefit of BPIs for clients in secondary care settings. Given that this new way of working has possible additional benefits such as improving access to psychological treatment and cost-effectiveness, further research in the area is warranted and encouraged. Key learning aims (1) To overview the current evidence for BPIs. (2) To outline a possible model for offering BPIs in secondary care. (3) To illustrate the potential positive effects of BPIs within a secondary care population. (4) To consider the need for future research and development of BPIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1754470x21000258

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief psychological interventions either using a CBT or ACT approach have demonstrated similar effects of reducing a range of mental health presentations.

    “Brief psychological interventions either using a CBT or ACT approach have demonstrated similar effects of reducing a range of mental health presentations.86 87”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Introduction reports improvements with brief CBT-based interventions for anxiety, depression, and mixed anxiety and depression; the Discussion describes the study’s findings as preliminary. Our copy does not report effects for ACT-based interventions or compare ACT with CBT, so it does not support the claim that the two approaches have similar effects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, K., Travers-Hill, E., Coker, S., Troup, J., Casey, S., Parkin, K., & Kim, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Kate
Venue
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Published
2021
Volume
14
ISSN
1754-470X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207127111
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
brief psychological intervention, anxiety, depression, secondary care, adult mental health services, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation, anxiety reduction, paraprofessionals, group supervision, treatment manual, well-being, functioning, access to psychological treatment, cost-effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review