The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE Interference with brain rhythms by noninvasive transcranial stimulation that uses weak transcranial alternating current may reveal itself to be a new tool for investigating cortical mechanisms currently unresolved. Here, we aim to extend transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) techniques to transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). BACKGROUND Parameters such as electrode size and position were taken from those used in previous tDCS studies. METHODS Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalogram (EEG)-power, and reaction times measured in a motor implicit learning task, were analyzed to detect changes in cortical excitability after 2-10 minutes of AC stimulation and sinusoidal DC stimulation (tSDCS) by using 1, 10, 15, 30, and 45 Hz and sham stimulation over the primary motor cortex in 50 healthy subjects (eight-16 subjects in each study). RESULTS A significantly improved implicit motor learning was observed after 10 Hz AC stimulation only. No significant changes were observed in any of the analyzed frequency bands of EEG and with regard to the MEP amplitudes after AC or tSDCS stimulation. Similarly, if the anodal or cathodal DC stimulation was superimposed on 5, 10, and 15 Hz AC stimulation, the MEP amplitudes did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS Transcranial application of weak AC current may appear to be a tool for basic and clinical research in diseases with altered EEG activity. However, its effect seems to be weaker than tDCS stimulation, at least in the present context of stimulus intensity and duration. Further studies are required to extend cautiously the safety range and uncover its influence on neuronal circuitries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Self-citationSustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Self-citationBoosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory
Marshall, L., Helgadóttir, H., Mölle, M., & Born, J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05278 · Cited by 1,792
Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET
Grafton, S., Mazziotta, J., Presty, S., Friston, K., Frackowiak, R., & Phelps, M. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02542.1992 · Cited by 607
Destexhe, A., Contreras, D., & Steriade, M. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04595.1999 · Cited by 573
Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study
Honda, M. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.11.2159 · Cited by 370
Modulation of use‐dependent plasticity by d‐amphetamine
Bütefisch, C. M., Davis, B. C., Sawaki, L., Waldvogel, D., Classen, J., Kopylev, L., & Cohen, L. G. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10056 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“Regarding studies in the human, this is in line with observations of increased activation of the motor cortex during motor learning tasks,(23,24) and also with pharmacologic results showing that results of motor training can be improved by cortical excitability enhancements.(25) It appears that a 10-Hz tACS-driven cor…”
Cited by
A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools
Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., Cohen, L. G., Fregni, F., Herrmann, C. S., Kappenman, E. S., et al. (2016) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012 · Cited by 1,439
Self-citationAntal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M., Brockmöller, J., Brunoni, A. R., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Dowthwaite, G., Ellrich, J., Flöel, A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001 · Cited by 1,301
Self-citationDirect effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans
Vöröslakos, M., Takeuchi, Y., Brinyiczki, K., Zombori, T., Oliva, A., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Kozák, G., Kincses, Z. T., Iványi, B., Buzsáki, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02928-3 · Cited by 735
Thut, G., Schyns, P. G., & Gross, J. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00170 · Cited by 560
EEG oscillations: from correlation to causality
Herrmann, C. S., Strüber, D., Helfrich, R. F., & Engel, A. K. (2016) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.003 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Antal, A., Boros, K., Poreisz, C., Chaieb, L., Terney, D., & Paulus, W.
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2045796994
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.brs.2007.10.001
- The paper
- Antal, A., Boros, K., Poreisz, C., Chaieb, L., Terney, D., & Paulus, W. (2008). Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2007.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.