Cited by 56Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementMental Health Treatment and Access

A Positive 2-Item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Screen Among Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients is Associated With Elevated 12-Month Mortality

Open access
Rollman, Bruce L., Herbeck Belnap, Bea, Mazumdar, Sati, Houck, Patricia R., He, Fanyin, Alvarez, Rene J., Schulberg, Herbert C., Reynolds, Charles F. +1 more·2012·Journal of Cardiac Failure

Abstract

Background Given the association of depression with poorer cardiac outcomes, an American Heart Association Science Advisory has advocated routine screening of cardiac patients for depression using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) "at a minimum." However, the prognostic value of the PHQ-2 among HF patients is unknown. Methods and results We screened hospitalized HF patients (ejection fraction [EF] <40%) that staff suspected may be depressed with the PHQ-2, and then determined vital status at up to 12-months follow-up. At baseline, PHQ-2 depression screen-positive patients (PHQ-2+; n = 371), compared with PHQ-2 screen-negative patients (PHQ-2-; n = 100), were younger (65 vs 70 years) and more likely to report New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV than class II symptoms (67% vs. 39%) and lower levels of physical and mental health-related quality of life (all P ≤ .002); they were similar in other characteristics (65% male, 26% mean EF). At 12 months, 20% of PHQ-2+ versus 8% of PHQ-2- patients had died (P = .007) and PHQ-2 status remained associated with both all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.7; P = .003) and cardiovascular (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.6; P = .03) mortality even after adjustment for age, gender, EF, NYHA functional class, and a variety of other covariates. Conclusions Among hospitalized HF patients, a positive PHQ-2 depression screen is associated with an elevated 12-month mortality risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.11.002

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief, well-validated 2-item screening tools have previously been used to screen for mood and anxiety symptoms in a range of clinical cardiology settings.

    “These screening tools have previously been used to screen for mood and anxiety symptoms in a range of clinical cardiology settings. 226-228”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [227]

    The Introduction and Methods (page numbers unavailable) describe use of the validated two-item PHQ-2 to screen for depression in hospitalized heart-failure patients, and discuss its use in coronary heart disease patients. The Methods assess anxiety with a separate PRIME-MD Anxiety Module, not a two-item tool; this paper therefore does not support the claim that a two-item tool screened for both mood and anxiety symptoms across a range of cardiology settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Barefoot JC Helms MJ Mark DB Blumenthal JA Califf RM Haney TL Depression and long-term mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease Am J Card 1996 78 613 617 8831391

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rollman, B. L., Herbeck Belnap, B., Mazumdar, S., Houck, P. R., He, F., Alvarez, R. J., Schulberg, H. C., Reynolds, C. F., & McNamara, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
238-245
ISSN
1071-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073207113
Cited by
56
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH078030)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024153)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression screening, PHQ-2, heart failure, depression, mortality, prognostic value, hospitalized patients, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, quality of life, NYHA functional class
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review