Cited by 156Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Depression increases the risk of mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis.

Open access
Gathright, Emily C., Goldstein, Carly M., Josephson, Richard A., Hughes, Joel W.·2017·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Background Depression is a risk factor for mortality in cardiovascular diseases. Prior studies confirm that depression predicts adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, data were inconclusive regarding the effect of depression on mortality. This meta-analysis examines the relationship between depression and mortality in HF.Methods Prospective studies of depression and mortality in HF published between 1999 and April 2016 were located using PubMed, PsychINFO, and MEDLINE. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used to compute an aggregated effect size estimates of hazard ratios and to conduct subgroup analyses.Results Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. For 8 aggregated univariate and 14 multivariate estimates, depressive symptoms were related to all-cause mortality. A pooled HR of 3 multivariate analyses indicated that depressive symptoms were not linked to cardiovascular mortality. In subgroup analyses, depression predicted all-cause mortality in samples with a mean age >65. The impact of depression on all-cause mortality also differed by follow-up duration, with samples with shorter follow-up durations demonstrating a larger effect.Conclusions In HF, depression is related to increased all-cause mortality risk, with stronger effects in samples with shorter follow-up and in older adults. In older adults, depression may serve as a marker of more severe HF. However, this possibility is difficult to examine given inconsistent adjustment for HF severity. Additional studies may assist in determining the relationship between depression and cardiovascular mortality, as the low number of studies examining cardiovascular mortality may have precluded detection of an effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.01.010

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychiatric symptoms and illnesses are associated with worse outcomes regarding the CVD, including poorer prognosis, lower quality of life, increased risk of mortality, and interference with CVD treatment.

    “Psychiatric symptoms and illnesses are in turn associated with several worse outcomes regarding the CVD: poorer prognosis of the course of the CVD, lower quality of life (QoL), increased risk of mortality, and interference with the CVD treatment, for example, due to worse adherence (3, 7–11).”

    From Metacognitive Short-Term Intervention in Patients With Mental Disorders Following Cardiovascular Events (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (Effect of Depressive Symptoms; page unavailable) associate depressive symptoms with increased all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure, and the Depression in Heart Failure section describes more adverse clinical events. The paper does not establish the broader claim for psychiatric illnesses across CVD, nor does it substantiate lower quality of life or interference with treatment through poorer adherence. Its Results also find no significant association with cardiovascular-specific mortality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gathright, E. C., Goldstein, C. M., Josephson, R. A., & Hughes, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
Gathright, Emily C.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
94
Pages
82-89
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579918759
Cited by
156
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL076134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
depression, heart failure, mortality, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, depressive symptoms, older adults, follow-up duration
MeSH terms
Depression, Heart Failure, Humans, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review