Cited by 226Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Mindfulness-based Mind Fitness Training: A Case Study of a High-Stress Predeployment Military Cohort

Stanley, Elizabeth A., Schaldach, John M., Kiyonaga, Anastasia, Jha, Amishi P.·2011·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2010.08.002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanley, E. A., Schaldach, J. M., Kiyonaga, A., & Jha, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Stanley, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
566-576
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037342927
Cited by
226
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness training, military deployment, United States Marine Corps, perceived stress, stress reduction, practice time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review