Cited by 86Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill

Open access
Kester, Liesbeth, Kirschner, Paul A., van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.·2006·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kester et al. (2006a) found an effect of interventions on experienced mental effort during learning but no effect on mental effort for understanding.

    “While their results showed an effect of interventions on experienced mental effort during learning, no effect was found on mental effort for understanding.”
  • The timing of self-report questionnaires differs across studies, with most presenting the questionnaire only after learning and others repeating it during learning.

    “The timing of the questionnaire also differs across studies. Most studies present the questionnaire only after learning has taken place (for example, Ayres 2006a; Hasler et al. 2007; Kalyuga et al. 1999; Pociask and Morrison 2008; Tindall-Ford et al. 1997), whereas other studies repeat the same questionnaire several times during (and sometimes also after) the learning process”
  • A 9-point scale is used most frequently in self-report cognitive load questionnaires, but 7-point scales are also used quite often.

    “Following Paas' original work, a scale with nine points is used most frequently (example studies are Kester et al. 2006a; Paas 1992; Paas et al. 2007; Paas and van Merrie ¨nboer 1993; van Gerven et al. 2002) but also a 7-point scale is used quite often”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
167-185
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165265457
Cited by
86
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
skill acquisition, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review