The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Long-Range Genomic Interactions at a Native Locus by Targeted Tethering of a Looping Factor
Open accessAbstract
Chromatin loops juxtapose distal enhancers with active promoters, but their molecular architecture and relationship with transcription remain unclear. In erythroid cells, the locus control region (LCR) and β-globin promoter form a chromatin loop that requires transcription factor GATA1 and the associated molecule Ldb1. We employed artificial zinc fingers (ZF) to tether Ldb1 to the β-globin promoter in GATA1 null erythroblasts, in which the β-globin locus is relaxed and inactive. Remarkably, targeting Ldb1 or only its self-association domain to the β-globin promoter substantially activated β-globin transcription in the absence of GATA1. Promoter-tethered Ldb1 interacted with endogenous Ldb1 complexes at the LCR to form a chromatin loop, causing recruitment and phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II. ZF-Ldb1 proteins were inactive at alleles lacking the LCR, demonstrating that their activities depend on long-range interactions. Our findings establish Ldb1 as a critical effector of GATA1-mediated loop formation and indicate that chromatin looping causally underlies gene regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast to YY1 and ZNF143, LDB1 has been shown to form loops independently of both cohesin and CTCF [371, 375].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [371]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LDB1 was first identified as a looping factor in the mouse β-globin locus [317, 371].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [371]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The functional significance of the physical approximation of the promoter to the enhancer was demonstrated in experiments on the activation of transcription through the forced formation of enhancer-promoter loops [87,88].”
From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Stimulation of promoter activity by forced looping with an enhancer is a strong argument in favor of this model [87,88,110,111].”
From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“and physical contact between enhancer-promoter pairs appears to be sufficient for gene activation.26”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Tethering the SA domain to the LCR (L-SA in Figure 1) or β-major promoter (Deng et al., 2012, and data not shown) did not activate βh1-globin expression”
From Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping (2014) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“In adult type murine erythroid cells, Ldb1 is required for the juxtaposition between the LCR and the adult β-major globin gene (Deng et al., 2012; Song et al., 2007).”
From Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping (2014) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“These results demonstrated that forced juxtaposition of an enhancer and promoter via chromatin looping can trigger gene activation”
From Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping (2014) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Finally, previous 3C experiments demonstrated the sufficiency of tethered Ldb1 for full reconstitution of an LCR-β-globin promoter loop in immature adult erythroid cells in which the globin locus is otherwise unlooped (Deng et al., 2012).”
From Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping (2014) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capturing Chromosome Conformation
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M., & Kleckner, N. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067799 · Cited by 3,652 · cited 2×
“The use of chromosome conformation capture (3C) and its derivatives has revealed that distant chromosomal elements can be juxtaposed to form chromatin loops, thus providing one mechanism of long-range enhancer function (Cullen et al., 1993; Dekker et al., 2002).”
Looping and Interaction between Hypersensitive Sites in the Active β-globin Locus
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.-J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F., & de Laat, W. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00781-5 · Cited by 1,344 · cited 2×
“…arose from studies of the mammalian b-globin locus, which is among the first gene clusters at which long-range chromosomal interactions between a powerful distal enhancer, the locus control region (LCR), and the target b-globin promoters were described (Carter et al., 2002; Tolhuis et al., 2002).”
Pevny, L., Simon, M. C., Robertson, E., Klein, W. H., Tsai, S.-F., D'Agati, V., Orkin, S. H., & Costantini, F. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349257a0 · Cited by 1,308 · cited 1×
“GATA1 is a DNA-binding protein essential for normal erythroid differentiation and b-globin gene expression (Evans and Felsenfeld, 1989; Pevny et al., 1991; Tsai et al., 1989).”
Tsai, S., Martin, D. I. K., Zon, L. I., D’Andrea, A. D., Wong, G. G., & Orkin, S. H. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339446a0 · Cited by 884 · cited 1×
“GATA1 is a DNA-binding protein essential for normal erythroid differentiation and b-globin gene expression (Evans and Felsenfeld, 1989; Pevny et al., 1991; Tsai et al., 1989).”
The Discovery of Zinc Fingers and Their Applications in Gene Regulation and Genome Manipulation
Klug, A. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-010909-095056 · Cited by 710 · cited 3×
“ZFs have previously been linked to activation domains to successfully activate gene expression (Klug, 2010).”
InfluentialLong-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo
Carter, D., Chakalova, L., Osborne, C. S., Dai, Y.-F., & Fraser, P. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1051 · Cited by 663 · cited 3×
“Fundamental insights into these issues arose from studies of the mammalian b-globin locus, which is among the first gene clusters at which long-range chromosomal interactions between a powerful distal enhancer, the locus control region (LCR), and the target b-globin promoters were described (Carter et al., 2002; Tolhu…”
Transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis: an affair involving multiple partners
Cantor, A. B., & Orkin, S. H. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205326 · Cited by 610 · cited 1×
“However, physical interactions among all of these proteins have been reported (Cantor and Orkin, 2002), making it difficult to distinguish whether they function in linear or parallel pathways.”
The erythroid-specific transcription factor eryf1: A new finger protein
Evans, T., & Felsenfeld, G. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90940-9 · Cited by 580 · cited 1×
“GATA1 is a DNA-binding protein essential for normal erythroid differentiation and b-globin gene expression (Evans and Felsenfeld, 1989; Pevny et al., 1991; Tsai et al., 1989).”
The β-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation
Palstra, R.-J., Tolhuis, B., Splinter, E., Nijmeijer, R., Grosveld, F., & de Laat, W. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1244 · Cited by 559
Proximity among Distant Regulatory Elements at the β-Globin Locus Requires GATA-1 and FOG-1
Vakoc, C. R., Letting, D. L., Gheldof, N., Sawado, T., Bender, M. A., Groudine, M., Weiss, M. J., Dekker, J., & Blobel, G. A. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.028 · Cited by 490 · cited 6×
“Using HS2 as the anchor region, we found that, in parental G1E cells, the 3C signals generally declined with increasing distance (Figure 3A), which is consistent with our previous observations (Vakoc et al., 2005).”
InfluentialLong-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus
Spilianakis, C. G., & Flavell, R. A. (2004) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1115 · Cited by 431 · cited 1×
“Although looping can occur at genes prior to their full activation, the onset of transcription is tightly associated with additional looped interactions (Palstra et al., 2003; Spilianakis and Flavell, 2004; Vernimmen et al., 2007).”
Zhang, J., Socolovsky, M., Gross, A. W., & Lodish, H. F. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-05-1479 · Cited by 386 · cited 6×
“The R1 (Ter119- and CD71-/low) populations were isolated, infected with desired retrovirus, and cultured for 24 hr in proliferation medium containing Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% glutamine, 10 ng/ml mIL3, 20 ng/ml m/h IL6, 50 ng/ml…”
InfluentialThaler, J. P., Lee, S., Jurata, L. W., Gill, G. N., & Pfaff, S. L. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00823-1 · Cited by 363 · cited 1×
“Indeed, a widely used and evolutionarily conserved looping function for Ldb1 is suggested by studies in diverse organisms and cell lineages (Matthews and Visvader, 2003; Morcillo et al., 1997; Thaler et al., 2002).”
The active spatial organization of the β-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF
Drissen, R., Palstra, R.-J., Gillemans, N., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F., Philipsen, S., & de Laat, W. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.317004 · Cited by 352 · cited 3×
“, 2005), KLF1 (also known as EKLF) (Drissen et al., 2004), and the more broadly expressed protein Ldb1 (Song et al.”
Weiss, M. J., Yu, C., & Orkin, S. H. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.3.1642 · Cited by 349 · cited 1×
“Cell Culture G1E andG1E-ER4 cells were cultured as described (Weiss et al., 1997).”
Lamonica, J. M., Deng, W., Kadauke, S., Campbell, A. E., Gamsjaeger, R., Wang, H., Cheng, Y., Billin, A. N., Hardison, R. C., Mackay, J. P., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102140108 · Cited by 262 · cited 2×
“…the gene were impaired in the absence of GATA1, suggesting GATA1 impacts on P-TEFb regulation at multiple levels, perhaps via direct interaction (Bottardi et al., 2011; Elagib et al., 2008) or indirectly via proteins of the bromodomain and extra terminal domain (BET) family (Lamonica et al., 2011).”
Chromatin loops in gene regulation
Kadauke, S., & Blobel, G. A. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.07.002 · Cited by 246 · cited 1×
“Chromatin looping has been discovered at numerous gene loci and reflects a widespread organizing principle of the chromatin fiber (for review, see Dean, 2011; Kadauke and Blobel, 2009; Miele and Dekker, 2008; Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Sexton et al., 2009).”
The genome-wide dynamics of the binding of Ldb1 complexes during erythroid differentiation
Soler, E., Andrieu-Soler, C., de Boer, E., Bryne, J. C., Thongjuea, S., Stadhouders, R., Palstra, R.-J., Stevens, M., Kockx, C., van IJcken, W., et al. (2010) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.551810 · Cited by 245 · cited 2×
“GATA1 and Ldb1 display a highly overlapping genomic occupancy pattern, but notably, Ldb1 association strongly favors sites at which GATA1 functions as a transcriptional activator, such as the b-globin locus (Cheng et al., 2009; Kassouf et al., 2010; Soler et al., 2010; Tripic et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011).”
Vernimmen, D., Gobbi, M. D., Sloane‐Stanley, J. A., Wood, W. G., & Higgs, D. R. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601654 · Cited by 244
A positive role for NLI/Ldb1 in long-range β-globin locus control region function
Song, S.-H., Hou, C., & Dean, A. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.025 · Cited by 233 · cited 4×
“Third, like GATA1, Ldb1 cooccupies the b-globin promoter and LCR and might therefore function by physically linking the two (Song et al., 2007; Tripic et al., 2009).”
InfluentialTranscription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcriptionPreprint
Mitchell, J. A., & Fraser, P. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.454008 · Cited by 225 · cited 2×
“However, based on studies using pharmacological inhibitors of transcription elongation, it has become clear that ongoing transcription is dispensable for sustaining preformed chromatin loops (Mitchell and Fraser, 2008; Palstra et al., 2008).”
Bender, M. A., Bulger, M., Close, J., & Groudine, M. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80433-5 · Cited by 224 · cited 6×
“The strong induction of b-globin transcription by ZF-Ldb1 or ZFSA implicates an involvement of the LCR and, hence, chromatin looping, because in the absence of the LCR, b-globin transcription is very low (Bender et al., 2000).”
InfluentialCheng, Y., Wu, W., Ashok Kumar, S., Yu, D., Deng, W., Tripic, T., King, D. C., Chen, K.-B., Zhang, Y., Drautz, D., et al. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.098921.109 · Cited by 223 · cited 2×
“GATA1 and Ldb1 display a highly overlapping genomic occupancy pattern, but notably, Ldb1 association strongly favors sites at which GATA1 functions as a transcriptional activator, such as the b-globin locus (Cheng et al., 2009; Kassouf et al., 2010; Soler et al., 2010; Tripic et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011).”
Jing, H., Vakoc, C. R., Ying, L., Mandat, S. A., Wang, H., Zheng, X., & Blobel, G. A. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.020 · Cited by 221 · cited 5×
“On the other hand, our observation that ZF-Ldb1 proteins completely rescued chromatin looping but only partially restored transcription elongation agrees with the notion that full transcription is not required for loop formation (Jing et al., 2008; Mitchell and Fraser, 2008; Palstra et al., 2008).”
InfluentialMorcillo, P., Rosen, C., Baylies, M. K., & Dorsett, D. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.20.2729 · Cited by 207 · cited 2×
“Indeed, a widely used and evolutionarily conserved looping function for Ldb1 is suggested by studies in diverse organisms and cell lineages (Matthews and Visvader, 2003; Morcillo et al., 1997; Thaler et al., 2002).”
CTCF-dependent enhancer-blocking by alternative chromatin loop formation
Hou, C., Zhao, H., Tanimoto, K., & Dean, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808506106 · Cited by 205 · cited 2×
“, 2008), and placing an enhancer and promoter on separate loops can isolate the enhancer to render it inactive (Ameres et al., 2005; Hou et al., 2008).”
Self-citationInteraction Between Transcription Regulatory Regions of Prolactin Chromatin
Cullen, K., Kladde, M. P., & Seyfred, M. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8327891 · Cited by 203 · cited 2×
“The use of chromosome conformation capture (3C) and its derivatives has revealed that distant chromosomal elements can be juxtaposed to form chromatin loops, thus providing one mechanism of long-range enhancer function (Cullen et al., 1993; Dekker et al., 2002).”
Long-range chromosomal interactions and gene regulation
Miele, A., & Dekker, J. (2008) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/b803580f · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“Chromatin looping has been discovered at numerous gene loci and reflects a widespread organizing principle of the chromatin fiber (for review, see Dean, 2011; Kadauke and Blobel, 2009; Miele and Dekker, 2008; Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Sexton et al., 2009).”
Transcription factors mediate long-range enhancer–promoter interactions
Nolis, I. K., McKay, D. J., Mantouvalou, E., Lomvardas, S., Merika, M., & Thanos, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0902454106 · Cited by 197 · cited 2×
“, 2007), as well as studies in eukaryotic cells using plasmid constructs, have succeeded in influencing gene expression through forced looping among regulatory elements (Ameres et al., 2005; Mahmoudi et al., 2002; Nolis et al., 2009; Petrascheck et al., 2005).”
Kassouf, M. T., Hughes, J. R., Taylor, S., McGowan, S. J., Soneji, S., Green, A. L., Vyas, P., & Porcher, C. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.104935.110 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“…Ldb1 display a highly overlapping genomic occupancy pattern, but notably, Ldb1 association strongly favors sites at which GATA1 functions as a transcriptional activator, such as the b-globin locus (Cheng et al., 2009; Kassouf et al., 2010; Soler et al., 2010; Tripic et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011).”
SCL and associated proteins distinguish active from repressive GATA transcription factor complexes
Tripic, T., Deng, W., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Vakoc, C. R., Gregory, G. D., Hardison, R. C., & Blobel, G. A. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-169417 · Cited by 183 · cited 9×
“Third, like GATA1, Ldb1 cooccupies the b-globin promoter and LCR and might therefore function by physically linking the two (Song et al., 2007; Tripic et al., 2009).”
InfluentialFunctional Analysis of the Nuclear LIM Domain Interactor NLI
Jurata, L. W., & Gill, G. N. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.10.5688 · Cited by 169 · cited 1×
“Fourth, Ldb1 can form homodimers and even higher-order oligomers (Cross et al., 2010; Jurata and Gill, 1997), which might underlie its role in loop formation.”
LIM‐domain‐binding protein 1: a multifunctional cofactor that interacts with diverse proteins
Matthews, J. M., & Visvader, J. E. (2003) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400030 · Cited by 164 · cited 1×
“Indeed, a widely used and evolutionarily conserved looping function for Ldb1 is suggested by studies in diverse organisms and cell lineages (Matthews and Visvader, 2003; Morcillo et al., 1997; Thaler et al., 2002).”
Sawado, T., Halow, J. M., Bender, M. A., & Groudine, M. T. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1072303 · Cited by 163 · cited 3×
“phosphorylation at serine 5 of its C-terminal domain, a modification associated with early transcription elongation (Sawado et al., 2003).”
The transcriptional interactome: gene expression in 3D
Schoenfelder, S., Clay, I., & Fraser, P. (2010) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2010.02.002 · Cited by 161 · cited 1×
“Chromatin looping has been discovered at numerous gene loci and reflects a widespread organizing principle of the chromatin fiber (for review, see Dean, 2011; Kadauke and Blobel, 2009; Miele and Dekker, 2008; Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Sexton et al., 2009).”
GAGA can mediate enhancer function in trans by linking two separate DNA molecules
Mahmoudi, T., Katsani, K. R., & Verrijzer, C. P. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/21.7.1775 · Cited by 141 · cited 2×
“, 2007), as well as studies in eukaryotic cells using plasmid constructs, have succeeded in influencing gene expression through forced looping among regulatory elements (Ameres et al., 2005; Mahmoudi et al., 2002; Nolis et al., 2009; Petrascheck et al., 2005).”
Palstra, R.-J. T. S., Simonis, M., Klous, P., Brasset, É., Eijkelkamp, B. A., & de Laat, W. L. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001661 · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“However, based on studies using pharmacological inhibitors of transcription elongation, it has become clear that ongoing transcription is dispensable for sustaining preformed chromatin loops (Mitchell and Fraser, 2008; Palstra et al., 2008).”
Xu, Z., Huang, S., Chang, L., Agulnick, A. D., & Brandt, S. J. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.21.7585-7599.2003 · Cited by 139 · cited 2×
“Is Sufficient for b-Globin Activation Ldb1 contains an N-terminal self-association (SA) domain that mediates the assembly of higher-order molecular complexes and might account for its looping function (Cross et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2003).”
Genomic interactions: Chromatin loops and gene meeting points in transcriptional regulation
Sexton, T., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2009) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.06.004 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×
“Chromatin looping has been discovered at numerous gene loci and reflects a widespread organizing principle of the chromatin fiber (for review, see Dean, 2011; Kadauke and Blobel, 2009; Miele and Dekker, 2008; Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Sexton et al., 2009).”
Dynamics of the epigenetic landscape during erythroid differentiation after GATA1 restoration
Wu, W., Cheng, Y., Keller, C. A., Ernst, J., Kumar, S. A., Mishra, T., Morrissey, C., Dorman, C. M., Chen, K.-B., Drautz, D., et al. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.125088.111 · Cited by 118 · cited 2×
“GATA1 and Ldb1 display a highly overlapping genomic occupancy pattern, but notably, Ldb1 association strongly favors sites at which GATA1 functions as a transcriptional activator, such as the b-globin locus (Cheng et al., 2009; Kassouf et al., 2010; Soler et al., 2010; Tripic et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011).”
Self-citationWhat are the molecular ties that maintain genomic loops?
Marenduzzo, D., Faro‐Trindade, I., & Cook, P. R. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.01.007 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“Prior studies in prokaryotes (for review, see Marenduzzo et al., 2007), as well as studies in eukaryotic cells using plasmid constructs, have succeeded in influencing gene expression through forced looping among regulatory elements (Ameres et al., 2005; Mahmoudi et al., 2002; Nolis et al., 2009;…”
DNA looping induced by a transcriptional enhancer in vivo
Petrascheck, M. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki689 · Cited by 99 · cited 2×
“, 2007), as well as studies in eukaryotic cells using plasmid constructs, have succeeded in influencing gene expression through forced looping among regulatory elements (Ameres et al., 2005; Mahmoudi et al., 2002; Nolis et al., 2009; Petrascheck et al., 2005).”
In the loop: long range chromatin interactions and gene regulation
Dean, A. (2011) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elq033 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“Chromatin looping has been discovered at numerous gene loci and reflects a widespread organizing principle of the chromatin fiber (for review, see Dean, 2011; Kadauke and Blobel, 2009; Miele and Dekker, 2008; Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Sexton et al., 2009).”
Multiple functions of Ldb1 required for β-globin activation during erythroid differentiation
Song, S., Kim, A., Ragoczy, T., Bender, M. A., Groudine, M. T., & Dean, A. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-03-272252 · Cited by 71 · cited 2×
“In particular, forced association between the LCR and the b-globin gene sufficed to exert two functions ascribed to the LCR, the formation of a preinitiation complex at the promoter and the generation of early elongating Pol II, as reflected in Ser5ph (Sawado et al., 2003; Song et al., 2010).”
Engineered Zinc Finger Proteins for Controlling Stem Cell Fate
Bartsevich, V. V., Miller, J. C., Case, C. C., & Pabo, C. O. (2003) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.21-6-632 · Cited by 57 · cited 2×
“Binding of the ZFs to their designated DNA sequences was characterized by using a previously described ELISA-based assay (data not shown) (Bartsevich et al., 2003).”
Cross-talk of GATA-1 and P-TEFb in megakaryocyte differentiation
Elagib, K. E., Mihaylov, I. S., Delehanty, L. L., Bullock, G. C., Ouma, K. D., Caronia, J. F., Gonias, S. L., & Goldfarb, A. N. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-145722 · Cited by 55 · cited 3×
“The failure to fully restore transcription elongation can be explained by the lack of GATA1 and its cofactors that exert additional looping-independent functions, possibly including the recruitment and activation of P-TEFb complex (Bottardi et al., 2011; Elagib et al., 2008; see Discussion).”
Inducible DNA‐loop formation blocks transcriptional activation by an SV40 enhancer
Ameres, S. L., Drueppel, L., Pfleiderer, K., Schmidt, A., Hillen, W., & Berens, C. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600531 · Cited by 48 · cited 4×
“, 2008), and placing an enhancer and promoter on separate loops can isolate the enhancer to render it inactive (Ameres et al., 2005; Hou et al., 2008).”
InfluentialLIM Domain Binding Proteins 1 and 2 Have Different Oligomeric States
Cross, A. J., Jeffries, C. M., Trewhella, J., & Matthews, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.006 · Cited by 42 · cited 4×
“Fourth, Ldb1 can form homodimers and even higher-order oligomers (Cross et al., 2010; Jurata and Gill, 1997), which might underlie its role in loop formation.”
InfluentialIkaros interacts with P-TEFb and cooperates with GATA-1 to enhance transcription elongation
Bottardi, S., Zmiri, F. A., Bourgoin, V., Ross, J., Mavoungou, L. O., & Milot, É. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1271 · Cited by 41 · cited 3×
“The failure to fully restore transcription elongation can be explained by the lack of GATA1 and its cofactors that exert additional looping-independent functions, possibly including the recruitment and activation of P-TEFb complex (Bottardi et al., 2011; Elagib et al., 2008; see Discussion).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tripic, T., Deng, W., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Vakoc, C.R., Gregory, G.D., Hardison, R.C., and Blobel, G.A. (2009). SCL and associated proteins distinguish active from repressive GATA transcription factor complexes. Blood 113, 2191–2201. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organization and function of the 3D genome
Bonev, B., & Cavalli, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.112 · Cited by 1,174
Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology
Mali, P., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2649 · Cited by 1,197
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102
Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: Interpreting chromatin interaction data
Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3454 · Cited by 1,068
“Further, the looping interaction directly stimulates transcription by facilitating recruitment and phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II 39 .”
BackgroundYY1 Is a Structural Regulator of Enhancer-Promoter Loops
Weintraub, A. S., Li, C. H., Zamudio, A. V., Sigova, A. A., Hannett, N. M., Day, D. S., Abraham, B. J., Cohen, M. A., Nabet, B., Buckley, D. L., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.008 · Cited by 992
“Nonetheless, most recent study of eukaryotic enhancer-promoter interactions has focused on cofactors that lack DNA binding capabilities and bridge enhancer-bound transcription factors and promoter-bound transcription apparatus (Allen and Taatjes, 2015; Deng et al., 2012; Jeronimo et al., 2016; Kagey et al., 2010; Mali…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, W., Lee, J., Wang, H., Miller, J., Reik, A., Gregory, P. D., Dean, A., & Blobel, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Sangamo BioSciences (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blobel, Gerd A.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1233-1244
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3372860
- OpenAlex
- W1970831058
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 22.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL119479)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R37DK058044, R01DK054937)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- chromatin looping, locus control region, beta-globin promoter, LDB1, GATA-1, erythroid cells, enhancer-promoter interactions, RNA polymerase II phosphorylation, transcriptional activation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Cell Separation, Chromatin, DNA-Binding Proteins, Embryo, Mammalian, Erythroblasts, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Zinc Fingers, Protein Structure, Tertiary, GATA1 Transcription Factor, Mice, beta-Globins, LIM Domain Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review