Cited by 244Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression

Open access
Vernimmen, Douglas, Gobbi, Marco De, Sloane‐Stanley, Jacqueline A, Wood, William G, Higgs, Douglas R·2007·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

To understand how mammalian genes are regulated from their natural chromosomal environment, we have analysed the molecular events occurring throughout a 150 kb chromatin segment containing the alpha globin gene locus as it changes from a poised, silent state in erythroid progenitors, to the fully activated state in late, erythroid cells. Active transcription requires the late recruitment of general transcription factors, mediator and Pol II not only to the promoter but also to its remote regulatory elements. Natural mutants of the alpha cluster show that whereas recruitment of the pre-initiation complex to the upstream elements occurs independently, recruitment to the promoter is largely dependent on the regulatory elements. An improved, quantitative chromosome conformation capture analysis demonstrates that this recruitment is associated with a conformational change, in vivo, apposing the promoter with its remote regulators, consistent with a chromosome looping mechanism. These findings point to a general mechanism by which a gene can be held in a poised state until the appropriate stage for expression, coordinating the level and timing of gene expression during terminal differentiation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601654

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Active enhancers are often in physical proximity to the promoters they activate, regardless of the genomic distances between these enhancers and promoters.

    “First, it was shown that active enhancers are often in physical proximity to the promoters they activate, regardless of the genomic distances between these enhancers and promoters [32,33,34].”

    From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion reports 3C evidence consistent with direct physical interaction between remote upstream regulatory elements and the α-globin promoter, with looping coinciding with transcription onset. The Introduction notes that regulatory elements can be tens or hundreds of kilobases from the genes they control. This supports long-range proximity in the studied locus, but not the broader claim that active enhancers are often close to their promoters regardless of genomic distance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boehm AK, Saunders A, Werner J, Lis JT (2003) Transcription factor and polymerase recruitment, modification, and movement on dhsp70 in vivo in the minutes following heat shock. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7628-7637
  2. Plant KE, Routledge SJ, Proudfoot NJ (2001) Intergenic transcription in the human beta-globin gene cluster. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6507-6514

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernimmen, D., Gobbi, M. D., Sloane‐Stanley, J. A., Wood, W. G., & Higgs, D. R.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Higgs, Douglas R
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2007-03-22
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
2041-2051
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2162912283
Cited by
244
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Torino
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
chromatin looping, gene expression timing, erythroid differentiation, general transcription factors, Mediator complex, RNA polymerase II, chromatin conformation, terminal differentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosomes, Gene Expression Regulation, Globins, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Erythroid Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review