The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells
Open accessAbstract
Factor-induced reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is inefficient, complicating mechanistic studies. Here, we examined defined intermediate cell populations poised to becoming iPSCs by genome-wide analyses. We show that induced pluripotency elicits two transcriptional waves, which are driven by c-Myc/Klf4 (first wave) and Oct4/Sox2/Klf4 (second wave). Cells that become refractory to reprogramming activate the first but fail to initiate the second transcriptional wave and can be rescued by elevated expression of all four factors. The establishment of bivalent domains occurs gradually after the first wave, whereas changes in DNA methylation take place after the second wave when cells acquire stable pluripotency. This integrative analysis allowed us to identify genes that act as roadblocks during reprogramming and surface markers that further enrich for cells prone to forming iPSCs. Collectively, our data offer new mechanistic insights into the nature and sequence of molecular events inherent to cellular reprogramming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Taken together, these two attributes may act as the source of memory for initial cell identity during a time when the somatic transcriptional program is otherwise mostly repressed and somatic proteins such as CD13 are lost (Polo et al., 2012; David and Polo, 2014).”
From Multi-omic rejuvenation of human cells by maturation phase transient reprogramming (2022) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, we must note that all of the transcriptional remodeling studies utilizing OSKM occupancy data are limited to the events that occur in the beginning (fibroblasts) or end points (pluripotent stem cells), with everything in between still up for interpretation 80,83,85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The distinct mechanisms observed among combinations of OCT4 and SOX2 (without KLF4) versus OSK may explain the controversy regarding whether OSK mainly function as the pioneer factors or bind readily open chromatin in early reprogramming, or both 80,82,83,85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cellular reprogramming to pluripotency by forced expression of the Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc [OSKM]) occurs through the global remodeling of epigenetic marks”
From In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming. (2016) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, cellular reprogramming to pluripotency occurs through a stepwise global epigenetic remodeling (Benayoun et al., 2015;Liu et al., 2013b;Polo et al., 2012).”
From In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming. (2016) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First, MYC primarily facilitates early gene induction for proliferation, whereas OCT4 and SOX2 induce chromatin opening while also binding readily open chromatin enriched with KLF4 motifs, supporting the notion that KLF4 recruits OCT4 and SOX2 to somatic chromatin that later becomes closed 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Genes associated with cell proliferation, metabolism and cytoskeleton organization were activated first, with developmental genes temporarily downregulated.”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It was initially reported in MEFs that transcriptional remodeling occurs in two waves, the first driven by MYC and KLF4 in the first 3 days and the second by OSK (ref.83).”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Changes in DNA methylation were initially thought to happen in the late stages of reprogramming 83 , but a recent study revealed that loci near Oct4, Klf4 and Nanog are demethylated earlier and de novo DNA methylation occurs in late reprogramming 85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“OSKM induction triggers complex cellular changes1–3.”
From In vivo partial reprogramming of myofibers promotes muscle regeneration by remodeling the stem cell niche (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“It is worth noting, however, that full reprogramming is relatively inefficient, with ~3% of cells reaching full reprogramming in the first round 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“whereas OCT4 and SOX2 induce chromatin opening while also binding readily open chromatin enriched with KLF4 motifs, supporting the notion that KLF4 recruits OCT4 and SOX2 to somatic chromatin that later becomes closed 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · Cited by 20,221
Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond
Jones, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3230 · Cited by 6,061
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data
Irizarry, R. A. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gng015 · Cited by 4,837
More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing
Hochberg, Y., & Benjamini, Y. (1990) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780090710 · Cited by 2,715
Maherali, N., Sridharan, R., Xie, W., Utikal, J., Eminli, S., Arnold, K., Stadtfeld, M., Yachechko, R., Tchieu, J., Jaenisch, R., et al. (2007) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 · Cited by 1,725
Self-citationDissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis
Mikkelsen, T. S., Hanna, J. H., Zhang, X., Ku, M., Wernig, M., Schorderet, P., Bernstein, B., Jaenisch, R., Lander, E. S., & Meissner, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07056 · Cited by 1,515
Connecting microRNA Genes to the Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry of Embryonic Stem Cells
Marson, A., Levine, S. S., Cole, M. F., Frampton, G. M., Brambrink, T., Johnstone, S. E., Guenther, M. G., Johnston, W. K., Wernig, M., Newman, J. J., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.020 · Cited by 1,405
An Extended Transcriptional Network for Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells
Kim, J., Chu, J., Shen, X., Wang, J., & Orkin, S. H. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.039 · Cited by 1,361
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Chang, C., Ding, Z., Hung, Y.S., and Fung, P.C. (2008). Fast network component analysis (FastNCA) for gene regulatory network reconstruction from microarray data. Bioinformatics 24, 1349–1358. · DOI
- Sridharan, R., Tchieu, J., Mason, M.J., Yachechko, R., Kuoy, E., Horvath, S., Zhou, Q., and Plath, K. (2009). Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364–377. · DOI
- Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D.T., and Hochedlinger, K. (2008). Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2, 230–240. · DOI · Paper page
- Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M., and Hochedlinger, K. (2010). A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 7, 53–55. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 861
Galow, A.-M., & Peleg, S. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11030468 · Cited by 60
DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in stem cells
Cheng, Y., Xie, N., Jin, P., & Wang, T. (2015) · Cell Biochemistry and Function · doi:10.1002/cbf.3101 · Cited by 56
The dyskerin ribonucleoprotein complex as an OCT4/SOX2 coactivator in embryonic stem cells
Fong, Y. W., Ho, J. J., Inouye, C. J., & Tjian, R. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03573 · Cited by 54
Mitochondrial DNA copy number and replication in reprogramming and differentiation
John, J. C. S. (2016) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.028 · Cited by 55
A Serial shRNA Screen for Roadblocks to Reprogramming Identifies the Protein Modifier SUMO2
Borkent, M., Bennett, B. D., Lackford, B. L., Bar‐Nur, O., Brumbaugh, J., Wang, L., Du, Y., Fargo, D. C., Apostolou, E., Cheloufi, S., et al. (2016) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.02.004 · Cited by 57
Self-citationCellular trajectories and molecular mechanisms of iPSC reprogramming
Apostolou, E., & Stadtfeld, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.06.002 · Cited by 57
Self-citationDefining Reprogramming Checkpoints from Single-Cell Analyses of Induced Pluripotency
Tran, K. A., Pietrzak, S., Zaidan, N. Z., Siahpirani, A. F., McCalla, S. G., Zhou, A. S., Iyer, G., Roy, S., & Sridharan, R. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.056 · Cited by 57
Taguchi, J., Shibata, H., Kabata, M., Kato, M., Fukuda, K., Tanaka, A., Ohta, S., Ukai, T., Mitsunaga, K., Yamada, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25249-4 · Cited by 46
Linking Pluripotency Reprogramming and Cancer
Iglesias, J. M., Gumuzio, J., & Martín, Á. G. (2016) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0225 · Cited by 53
Epigenetics of cellular reprogramming
Krishnakumar, R., & Blelloch, R. H. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.06.005 · Cited by 54
Manipulation of KLF4 Expression Generates iPSCs Paused at Successive Stages of Reprogramming
Nishimura, K., Kato, T., Chen, C., Oinam, L., Shiomitsu, E., Ayakawa, D., Ohtaka, M., Fukuda, A., Nakanishi, M., & Hisatake, K. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.08.014 · Cited by 60
Song, Y., Liang, Z., Zhang, J., Hu, G.-C., Wang, J.-H., Li, Y.-Y., Guo, R., Dong, X.-T., Babarinde, I. A., Ping, W., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110626 · Cited by 46
Aulicino, F., Theka, I., Ombrato, L., Lluı́s, F., & Cosma, M. P. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.04.001 · Cited by 54
The role of the mtDNA set point in differentiation, development and tumorigenesis
Sun, X., & John, J. C. S. (2016) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20160008 · Cited by 55
Coordination of Cell Polarity, Mechanics and Fate in Tissue Self-organization.
Kim, E. J. Y., Korotkevich, E., & Hiiragi, T. (2018) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.008 · Cited by 47
Kashpur, O., Smith, A., Gerami‐Naini, B., Maione, A. G., Calabrese, R., Tellechea, A., Theocharidis, G., Liang, L., Pastar, I., Tomic‐Canic, M., et al. (2018) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201801059 · Cited by 53
Sandforth, L., Ammar, N., Dinges, L. A., Röcken, C., Arlt, A., Sebens, S., & Schäfer, H. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12030581 · Cited by 53
Schiebinger, G. R., Shu, J., Tabaka, M., Cleary, B., Subramanian, V., Solomon, A., Liu, S., Lin, S. L., Berube, P., Lee, L., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/191056 · Cited by 54
Self-citationBiological function of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)
Chaudhuri, J., Evans, T., Kumar, R., & DiMenna, L. J. (2014) · Biomedical Journal · doi:10.4103/2319-4170.128734 · Cited by 52
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Carter, A. C., Davis-Dusenbery, B., Koszka, K., Ichida, J., & Eggan, K. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.12.010 · Cited by 62
Imamura, K., Yada, Y., Izumi, Y., Morita, M., Kawata, A., Arisato, T., Nagahashi, A., Enami, T., Tsukita, K., Kawakami, H., et al. (2021) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26047 · Cited by 52
X Chromosome Dosage Influences DNA Methylation Dynamics during Reprogramming to Mouse iPSCs
Pasque, V., Karnik, R., Chronis, C., Petrella, P. E., Langerman, J., Bonora, G., Song, J., Vanheer, L., Dimashkie, A., Meissner, A., et al. (2018) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.019 · Cited by 51
The RNA exosome nuclease complex regulates human embryonic stem cell differentiation
Belair, C., Sim, S., Kim, K., Tanaka, Y., Park, I., and, & Wolin, S. L. (2019) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201811148 · Cited by 51
Chromatin accessibility dynamics during cell fate reprogramming
Li, D., Shu, X., Zhu, P., & Pei, D. (2021) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051644 · Cited by 50
Stimulation of Somatic Cell Reprogramming by ERas‐Akt‐FoxO1 Signaling Axis
Yu, Y. S., Liang, D., Tian, Q., Chen, X.-N., Jiang, B., Chou, B.-K., Hu, P., Cheng, L.-Z., Gao, P., Li, J., et al. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1447 · Cited by 49
Klf4 glutamylation is required for cell reprogramming and early embryonic development in mice
Ye, B., Liu, B., Hao, L., Zhu, X., Yang, L., Wang, S., Xia, P., Du, Y., Meng, S., Huang, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03008-2 · Cited by 48
Concise Review: Harmonies Played by MicroRNAs in Cell Fate Reprogramming
Moradi, S., Sassan Asgari, B., & Baharvand, H. (2013) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1576 · Cited by 48
Modulation of Epigenetic Regulators and Cell Fate Decisions by miRNAs
Gruber, A. J., & Zavolan, M. (2013) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi.13.65 · Cited by 48
H3K36 methylation maintains cell identity by regulating opposing lineage programmes
Hoetker, M. S., Yagi, M., Stefano, B. D., Langerman, J., Cristea, S., Wong, L. P., Huebner, A. J., Charlton, J., Deng, W., Haggerty, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01191-z · Cited by 46
Self-citationMahata, B., Cabrera, A., Brenner, D. A., Guerra-Resendez, R. S., Li, J., Goell, J., Wang, K., Guo, Y., Escobar, M., Parthasarathy, A. K., et al. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02036-1 · Cited by 47
The Chemistry of Regulation of Genes and Other Things
Ptashne, M. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.x114.547323 · Cited by 47
OCT4 and SOX2 Work as Transcriptional Activators in Reprogramming Human Fibroblasts
Narayan, S., Bryant, G., Shah, S., Berrozpe, G., & Ptashne, M. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.071 · Cited by 43
Human Pluripotency Is Initiated and Preserved by a Unique Subset of Founder Cells
Nakanishi, M., Mitchell, R. R., Benoit, Y. D., Orlando, L., Reid, J. C., Shimada, K., Davidson, K. C., Shapovalova, Z., Collins, T. J., Nagy, A., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.013 · Cited by 46
Sox2 and Klf4 as the Functional Core in Pluripotency Induction without Exogenous Oct4
An, Z., Liu, P., Zheng, J., Si, C., Li, T., Chen, Y., Ma, T., Zhang, M. Q., Zhou, Q., & Ding, S. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.026 · Cited by 47
Dissecting dual roles of MyoD during lineage conversion to mature myocytes and myogenic stem cellsPreprint
Yagi, M., Ji, F., Charlton, J., Cristea, S., Messemer, K. A., Horwitz, N., Stefano, B. D., Tsopoulidis, N., Hoetker, M. S., Huebner, A. J., et al. (2021) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.348678.121 · Cited by 48
Self-citationMitchell, R. R., Szabo, E., Shapovalova, Z., Aslostovar, L., Makondo, K. J., & Bhatia, M. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1721 · Cited by 45
The Epigenetic Reprogramming Roadmap in Generation of iPSCs from Somatic Cells
Brix, J., Zhou, Y., & Luo, Y. (2015) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2015.10.001 · Cited by 46
The expanding horizon of MicroRNAs in cellular reprogramming
Adlakha, Y. K., & Seth, P. (2016) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.11.003 · Cited by 47
Visualizing Structure and Transitions for Biological Data ExplorationPreprint
Moon, K. R., van Dijk, D., Wang, Z., Gigante, S., Burkhardt, D. B., Chen, W. S., Yim, K., van den Elzen, A. M. G., Hirn, M. J., Coifman, R. R., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/120378 · Cited by 56
MKL1-actin pathway restricts chromatin accessibility and prevents mature pluripotency activation
Hu, X., Liu, Z. Z., Chen, X., Schulz, V., Kumar, A., Hartman, A. A., Weinstein, J. N., Johnston, J. F., Rodriguez, E. C., Eastman, A. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09636-6 · Cited by 45
Heterochromatin loosening by the Oct4 linker region facilitates Klf4 binding and iPSC reprogramming
Chen, K., Long, Q., Xing, G., Wang, T., Wu, Y., Li, L., Qi, J., Zhou, Y., Ma, B., Schöler, H. R., et al. (2020) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201899165 · Cited by 40
Dynamic 3D Chromatin Reorganization during Establishment and Maintenance of Pluripotency
Pelham‐Webb, B., Murphy, D., & Apostolou, E. (2020) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.10.012 · Cited by 45
Self-citationTranscriptional Control of Somatic Cell Reprogramming
Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Li, W., Zhu, X., Bao, X., Qin, B., Hutchins, A. P., & Esteban, M. A. (2016) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.003 · Cited by 46
Nishimura, K., Aizawa, S., Nugroho, F. L., Shiomitsu, E., Yến, T. T. H., Bui, P. L., Borisova, E., Sakuragi, Y., Takada, H., Kurisaki, A., et al. (2017) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.026 · Cited by 47
Oct4 mediates Müller glia reprogramming and cell cycle exit during retina regeneration in zebrafish
Sharma, P., Gupta, S., Chaudhary, M., Mitra, S., Chawla, B., Khursheed, M. A., & Ramachandran, R. (2019) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.201900548 · Cited by 45
JMJD3 acts in tandem with KLF4 to facilitate reprogramming to pluripotency
Huang, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Tang, C., Qin, X., Wu, X., Pan, M., Tang, Y., Yang, Z., Babarinde, I. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18900-z · Cited by 46
Conversion of Human Fibroblasts Into Monocyte-Like Progenitor Cells
Pulecio, J., Nivet, E., Sancho-Martinez, I., Vitaloni, M., Güenechea, G., Xia, Y. F., Kurian, L., Dubova, I., Bueren, J. A., Laricchia‐Robbio, L., et al. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1800 · Cited by 43
Urbanska, M., Winzi, M., Neumann, K., Abuhattum, S., Rosendahl, P., Müller, P. F., Taubenberger, A. V., Anastassiadis, K., & Guck, J. R. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.155218 · Cited by 43
Lees, J. G., Gardner, D. K., & Harvey, A. J. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.168997 · Cited by 42
A novel machine learning based approach for iPS progenitor cell identification
Zhang, H., Shao, X., Peng, Y., Teng, Y., Saravanan, K. M., Zhang, H., Li, H., & Wei, Y. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007351 · Cited by 43
The role of BMP4 signaling in trophoblast emergence from pluripotency
Roberts, R. M., Ezashi, T., Temple, J., Owen, J. R., Soncin, F., & Parast, M. M. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04478-w · Cited by 43
Partial reprogramming strategy for intervertebral disc rejuvenation by activating energy switch
Cheng, F., Wang, C., Ji, Y., Yang, B., Shu, J., Shi, K., Wang, L., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., et al. (2022) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.13577 · Cited by 42
Emerging roles of the histone chaperone CAF-1 in cellular plasticity
Cheloufi, S., & Hochedlinger, K. (2017) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2017.06.004 · Cited by 46
Self-citationDirect Cardiac Reprogramming: A Novel Approach for Heart Regeneration
Tani, H., Sadahiro, T., & Ieda, M. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19092629 · Cited by 43
Wang, L., Su, Y., Huang, C., Yin, Y., Chu, A., Knupp, A., & Tang, Y. (2019) · Biology Open · doi:10.1242/bio.047225 · Cited by 39
Epigenetic Function of Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase and Its Link to Lymphomagenesis
Domínguez, P. M., & Shaknovich, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00642 · Cited by 42
Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of cellular reprogramming to induced pluripotency
van den Hurk, M., Kenis, G., Bardy, C., van den Hove, D., Gage, F. H., Steinbusch, H. W. M., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2016) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2016-0032 · Cited by 44
Genomic instability during reprogramming by nuclear transfer is DNA replication dependent
Chia, G., Agudo, J., Treff, N. R., Sauer, M. V., Billing, D. L., Brown, B. D., Baer, R. J., & Egli, D. M. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3485 · Cited by 40
Rony, I. K., Baten, A., Bloomfield, J. A., Islam, M. E., Billah, M. M., & Islam, K. M. D. (2015) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.12162 · Cited by 40
Looking to the future following 10 years of induced pluripotent stem cell technologies
Li, M., & Belmonte, J. C. I. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.108 · Cited by 44
Concise Review: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Drug Discovery for Mitochondrial Disease
Inak, G., Lorenz, C., Lisowski, P., Zink, A., Mlody, B., & Prigione, A. (2017) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.2637 · Cited by 41
KLF4 N-Terminal Variance Modulates Induced Reprogramming to Pluripotency
Kim, S.-I., Oceguera-Yañez, F., Hirohata, R., Linker, S., Okita, K., Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, T., Yamanaka, S., & Woltjen, K. (2015) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.004 · Cited by 39
Reprogramming‐derived gene cocktail increases cardiomyocyte proliferation for heart regeneration
Cheng, Y., Yan, Y., Lundy, D. J., Lo, A. H., Wang, Y., Ruan, S., Lin, P., & Hsieh, P. C. H. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606558 · Cited by 40
Binding of HMGN proteins to cell specific enhancers stabilizes cell identity
He, B., Deng, T., Zhu, I., Furusawa, T., Zhang, S., Tang, W., Postnikov, Y. V., Ambs, S., Li, C. C., Livák, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07687-9 · Cited by 39
Deep learning the cis-regulatory code of chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogrammingPreprint
Nair, S., Ameen, M., Sundaram, L., Pampari, A., Schreiber, J. M., Balsubramani, A., Wang, Y. X., Burns, D., Blau, H. M., Karakikes, I., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.04.560808 · Cited by 38
Rand, T. A., Sutou, K., Tanabe, K., Jeong, D., Nomura, M., Kitaoka, F., Tomoda, E., Narita, M., Nakamura, M., Nakamura, M., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.057 · Cited by 37
Hikichi, T., Matoba, R., Ikeda, T., Watanabe, A., Yamamoto, T., Yoshitake, S., Tamura‐Nakano, M., Kimura, T., Kamon, M., Shimura, M., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220200110 · Cited by 39
Tavakol, S. (2014) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2014.09.014 · Cited by 37
Mathematical approaches to modeling development and reprogramming
Morris, R., Sancho-Martinez, I., Sharpee, T. O., & Belmonte, J. C. I. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317150111 · Cited by 37
p63 Attenuates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Potential in an Experimental Prostate Cell Model
Olsen, J. R., Oyan, A. M., Rostad, K., Hellem, M. R., Liu, J., Li, L., Micklem, D., Haugen, H., Lorens, J. B., Rotter, V., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062547 · Cited by 38
Collaborative rewiring of the pluripotency network by chromatin and signalling modulating pathways
Tran, K. A., Jackson, S. A., Olufs, Z. P. G., Zaidan, N. Z., Leng, N., Kendziorski, C. M., Roy, S., & Sridharan, R. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7188 · Cited by 37
Lau, S., Ottosson, D. R., Jakobsson, J., & Parmar, M. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.017 · Cited by 38
Uncovering the true identity of naïve pluripotent stem cells
Welling, M., & Geijsen, N. (2013) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2013.04.004 · Cited by 38
The multiple roles of Thy-1 in cell differentiation and regeneration
Yang, J., Zhan, X., Malola, J., Li, Z., Pawar, J. S., Zhang, H., & Zha, Z. (2020) · Differentiation · doi:10.1016/j.diff.2020.03.003 · Cited by 38
The function and regulation of mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming
Shu, X., & Pei, D. (2014) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2014.08.005 · Cited by 37
The role of microRNAs in stemness of cancer stem cells
Rad, S. M. A. H., Bavarsad, M. S., Arefian, E., Jaseb, K., Shahjahani, M., & Saki, N. (2013) · Oncology Reviews · doi:10.4081/oncol.2013.e8 · Cited by 37
Felgentreff, K., Du, L., Weinacht, K. G., Dobbs, K., Bartish, M., Giliani, S., Schlaeger, T. M., DeVine, A. L., Schambach, A., Woodbine, L. J., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323649111 · Cited by 37
Prasad, A., Manivannan, J., Teh, D. B. L., Chua, S. M., Gharibani, P. M., & All, A. H. (2016) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme.16.5 · Cited by 37
Simic, M., Moehle, E. A., Schinzel, R. T., Lorbeer, F. K., Jullié, D., Halloran, J. J., Heydari, K., Sanchez, M., Hockemeyer, D. F., & Dillin, A. G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw0025 · Cited by 37
Epigenetic Clock: Just a Convenient Marker or an Active Driver of Aging?
Ashapkin, V. V., Kutueva, L. I., & Vanyushin, B. F. (2019) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25650-0_10 · Cited by 41
Wnt-3a Induces Epigenetic Remodeling in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells
Uribe‐Etxebarria, V., García-Gallastegui, P., Pérez-Garrastachu, M., Casado-Andrés, M., Irastorza, I., Unda, F. J., Ibarretxe, G., & Subirán, N. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9030652 · Cited by 38
Bhattacharya, A., Fushimi, A., Yamashita, N., Hagiwara, M., Morimoto, Y., Rajabi, H., Long, M. D., Abdulla, M., Ahmad, R., Street, K., et al. (2022) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0672 · Cited by 37
Liu, Y., Ma, Y., Yang, J., Cheng, D., Liu, X., Ma, X., West, F. D., & Wang, H. (2013) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-013-9485-9 · Cited by 36
Understanding the roadmaps to induced pluripotency
Liu, K., Song, Y., Yu, H., & Zhao, T. (2014) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.205 · Cited by 36
MYC Induces a Hybrid Energetics Program Early in Cell Reprogramming
Prieto, J., Seo, A. Y., León, M., Santacatterina, F., Torresano, L., Palomino‐Schätzlein, M., Giménez-Orenga, K., Vallet-Sánchez, A., Ponsoda, X., Pineda‐Lucena, A., et al. (2018) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.10.018 · Cited by 40
Remodeling of mitochondrial morphology and function: an emerging hallmark of cellular reprogramming
Rastogi, A., Joshi, P. K., Contreras, E., & Gama, V. (2019) · Cell Stress · doi:10.15698/cst2019.06.189 · Cited by 36
Retinal ganglion cell-specific genetic regulation in primary open-angle glaucoma
Daniszewski, M., Senabouth, A., Liang, H. H., Han, X., Lidgerwood, G. E., Hernández, D., Sivakumaran, P., Clarke, J. E., Lim, S. Y., Lees, J. G., et al. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100142 · Cited by 36
Self-citationDeciphering the roadmap of in vivo reprogramming toward pluripotency
Chondronasiou, D., Martínez de Villarreal, J., Melendez, E., Lynch, C. J., Pozo, N. D., Kovatcheva, M., Aguilera, M., Prats, N., Real, F. X., & Serrano, M. (2022) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.09.009 · Cited by 34
Jain, N., Goyal, Y., Dunagin, M. C., Cote, C. J., Mellis, I. A., Emert, B. L., Jiang, C., Dardani, I. P., Reffsin, S., Arnett, M. J., et al. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.01.001 · Cited by 30
Hirata, H., Sugimachi, K., Takahashi, Y., Ueda, M., Sakimura, S., Uchi, R., Kurashige, J., Takano, Y., Nanbara, S., Komatsu, H., et al. (2014) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4242-0 · Cited by 35
Gao, H., Wu, X., & Fossett, N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074684 · Cited by 36
Induction of pluripotency by defined factors
Tanabe, K., Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B · doi:10.2183/pjab.90.83 · Cited by 35
Partial cellular reprogramming: A deep dive into an emerging rejuvenation technology
Paine, P., Nguyen, A. T., & Ocampo, A. (2023) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.14039 · Cited by 41
Directed Dedifferentiation Using Partial Reprogramming Induces Invasive Phenotype in Melanoma Cells
Knappe, N., Novak, D., Weina, K., Bernhardt, M., Reith, M., Larribère, L., Hölzel, M., Tüting, T., Gebhardt, C., Umansky, V., et al. (2016) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.2284 · Cited by 36
An, J., Zheng, Y., & Dann, C. T. (2017) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.006 · Cited by 34
Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Myocytes to Reverse Fibrosis
Muraoka, N., & Ieda, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170301 · Cited by 33
Reprogramming Roadblocks Are System Dependent
Chantzoura, E., Skylaki, S., Ménendez, S., Kim, S., Johnsson, A., Linnarsson, S., Woltjen, K., Chambers, I., & Kaji, K. (2015) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.007 · Cited by 33
Huyghe, A., Furlan, G., Schröder, J., Bachelard-Cascales, É., Trajkova, A., Ruel, M., Stüder, F., Larcombe, M. R., Sun, Y., Mugnier, F., et al. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00986-w · Cited by 36
Self-citationNucleosome Organization in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Yazdi, P. G., Pedersen, B., Taylor, J. F., Khattab, O. S., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Jacobsen, S. E., & Wang, P. H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136314 · Cited by 31
Metabolic restructuring and cell fate conversion
Prigione, A., Ruiz-Pérez, M. V., Bukowiecki, R., & Adjaye, J. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-015-1834-1 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Polo, J. M., Anderssen, E., Walsh, R. M., Schwarz, B. A., Nefzger, C. M., Lim, S. M., Borkent, M., Apostolou, E., Alaei, S., Cloutier, J., Bar-Nur, O., Cheloufi, S., Stadtfeld, M., Figueroa, M. E., Robinton, D., Natesan, S., Melnick, A., Zhu, J., Ramaswamy, S., & Hochedlinger, K.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Monash University (AU)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramaswamy, Sridhar
- Hochedlinger, Konrad
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1617-1632
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3608203
- OpenAlex
- W2060613703
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 385 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (1dp2od003266-01)
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA009216)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099117)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001169)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD058013)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- induced pluripotent stem cells, cellular reprogramming, c-Myc, KLF4, Oct4, SOX2, bivalent domains, DNA methylation, cell surface markers, pluripotency
- MeSH terms
- Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Animals, Cytological Techniques, Humans, Transcription Factors, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
