The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells
Open accessAbstract
Factor-induced reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is inefficient, complicating mechanistic studies. Here, we examined defined intermediate cell populations poised to becoming iPSCs by genome-wide analyses. We show that induced pluripotency elicits two transcriptional waves, which are driven by c-Myc/Klf4 (first wave) and Oct4/Sox2/Klf4 (second wave). Cells that become refractory to reprogramming activate the first but fail to initiate the second transcriptional wave and can be rescued by elevated expression of all four factors. The establishment of bivalent domains occurs gradually after the first wave, whereas changes in DNA methylation take place after the second wave when cells acquire stable pluripotency. This integrative analysis allowed us to identify genes that act as roadblocks during reprogramming and surface markers that further enrich for cells prone to forming iPSCs. Collectively, our data offer new mechanistic insights into the nature and sequence of molecular events inherent to cellular reprogramming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Taken together, these two attributes may act as the source of memory for initial cell identity during a time when the somatic transcriptional program is otherwise mostly repressed and somatic proteins such as CD13 are lost (Polo et al., 2012; David and Polo, 2014).”
From Multi-omic rejuvenation of human cells by maturation phase transient reprogramming (2022) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, we must note that all of the transcriptional remodeling studies utilizing OSKM occupancy data are limited to the events that occur in the beginning (fibroblasts) or end points (pluripotent stem cells), with everything in between still up for interpretation 80,83,85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is worth noting, however, that full reprogramming is relatively inefficient, with ~3% of cells reaching full reprogramming in the first round 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The distinct mechanisms observed among combinations of OCT4 and SOX2 (without KLF4) versus OSK may explain the controversy regarding whether OSK mainly function as the pioneer factors or bind readily open chromatin in early reprogramming, or both 80,82,83,85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cellular reprogramming to pluripotency by forced expression of the Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc [OSKM]) occurs through the global remodeling of epigenetic marks”
From In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming. (2016) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, cellular reprogramming to pluripotency occurs through a stepwise global epigenetic remodeling (Benayoun et al., 2015;Liu et al., 2013b;Polo et al., 2012).”
From In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming. (2016) · cites this paper as Polo et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First, MYC primarily facilitates early gene induction for proliferation, whereas OCT4 and SOX2 induce chromatin opening while also binding readily open chromatin enriched with KLF4 motifs, supporting the notion that KLF4 recruits OCT4 and SOX2 to somatic chromatin that later becomes closed 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Genes associated with cell proliferation, metabolism and cytoskeleton organization were activated first, with developmental genes temporarily downregulated.”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It was initially reported in MEFs that transcriptional remodeling occurs in two waves, the first driven by MYC and KLF4 in the first 3 days and the second by OSK (ref.83).”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Changes in DNA methylation were initially thought to happen in the late stages of reprogramming 83 , but a recent study revealed that loci near Oct4, Klf4 and Nanog are demethylated earlier and de novo DNA methylation occurs in late reprogramming 85 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“OSKM induction triggers complex cellular changes1–3.”
From In vivo partial reprogramming of myofibers promotes muscle regeneration by remodeling the stem cell niche (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“whereas OCT4 and SOX2 induce chromatin opening while also binding readily open chromatin enriched with KLF4 motifs, supporting the notion that KLF4 recruits OCT4 and SOX2 to somatic chromatin that later becomes closed 83 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · Cited by 20,221
Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond
Jones, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3230 · Cited by 6,061
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data
Irizarry, R. A. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gng015 · Cited by 4,837
More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing
Hochberg, Y., & Benjamini, Y. (1990) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780090710 · Cited by 2,715
Maherali, N., Sridharan, R., Xie, W., Utikal, J., Eminli, S., Arnold, K., Stadtfeld, M., Yachechko, R., Tchieu, J., Jaenisch, R., et al. (2007) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 · Cited by 1,725
Self-citationDissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis
Mikkelsen, T. S., Hanna, J. H., Zhang, X., Ku, M., Wernig, M., Schorderet, P., Bernstein, B., Jaenisch, R., Lander, E. S., & Meissner, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07056 · Cited by 1,515
Connecting microRNA Genes to the Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry of Embryonic Stem Cells
Marson, A., Levine, S. S., Cole, M. F., Frampton, G. M., Brambrink, T., Johnstone, S. E., Guenther, M. G., Johnston, W. K., Wernig, M., Newman, J. J., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.020 · Cited by 1,405
An Extended Transcriptional Network for Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells
Kim, J., Chu, J., Shen, X., Wang, J., & Orkin, S. H. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.039 · Cited by 1,361
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Chang, C., Ding, Z., Hung, Y.S., and Fung, P.C. (2008). Fast network component analysis (FastNCA) for gene regulatory network reconstruction from microarray data. Bioinformatics 24, 1349–1358. · DOI
- Sridharan, R., Tchieu, J., Mason, M.J., Yachechko, R., Kuoy, E., Horvath, S., Zhou, Q., and Plath, K. (2009). Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364–377. · DOI
- Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D.T., and Hochedlinger, K. (2008). Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2, 230–240. · DOI · Paper page
- Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M., and Hochedlinger, K. (2010). A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 7, 53–55. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding specificities of human transcription factors
Yin, Y., Morgunova, E., Jolma, A., Kaasinen, E., Sahu, B., Khund-Sayeed, S., Das, P. K., Kivioja, T., Dave, K., Zhong, F., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj2239 · Cited by 1,257
Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data
Moon, K. R., van Dijk, D., Wang, Z., Gigante, S., Burkhardt, D. B., Chen, W. S., Yim, K., Elzen, A. V. D., Hirn, M. J., Coifman, R. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0336-3 · Cited by 1,065
In Vivo Amelioration of Age-Associated Hallmarks by Partial Reprogramming.
Ocampo, A., Reddy, P., Martinez-Redondo, P., Platero-Luengo, A., Hatanaka, F., Hishida, T., Li, M., Lam, D., Kurita, M., Beyret, E., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.052 · Cited by 988
Epithelial Plasticity: A Common Theme in Embryonic and Cancer Cells
Nieto, M. A. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234850 · Cited by 991
Schiebinger, G., Shu, J., Tabaka, M., Cleary, B., Subramanian, V., Solomon, A., Gould, J., Liu, S., Lin, S., Berube, P., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.006 · Cited by 829
Self-citationA decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.8 · Cited by 894
mRNA-based therapeutics: powerful and versatile tools to combat diseases
Qin, S., Tang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, K., Fan, N., Xiao, W., Zheng, Q., Li, G., Teng, Y., Wu, M., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01007-w · Cited by 852
Mariño, E., Richards, J. L., McLeod, K. H., Stanley, D., Yap, Y. A., Knight, J., McKenzie, C., Kranich, J., Oliveira, A. C., Rossello, F. J., et al. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3713 · Cited by 686
Self-citationCooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming
Chronis, C., Fiziev, P., Papp, B., Butz, S., Bonora, G., Sabri, S., Ernst, J., & Plath, K. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.016 · Cited by 555
Müller glial cell reprogramming and retina regeneration
Goldman, D. J. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3723 · Cited by 652
Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4): What we currently know
Ghaleb, A. M., & Yang, V. W. (2017) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2017.02.025 · Cited by 529
H3K9me3-Dependent Heterochromatin: Barrier to Cell Fate Changes
Becker, J. S., Nicetto, D., & Zaret, K. S. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.11.001 · Cited by 504
Ohnishi, K., Semi, K., Yamamoto, T., Shimizu, M., Tanaka, A., Mitsunaga, K., Okita, K., Osafune, K., Arioka, Y., Maeda, T., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.005 · Cited by 460
Epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers identified in DNA methylation maps from adult mouse tissues
Hon, G. C., Rajagopal, N., Shen, Y., McCleary, D. F., Yue, F., Dang, M. D., & Ren, B. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2746 · Cited by 477
The RNA-binding protein repertoire of embryonic stem cells
Kwon, S. C., Yi, H., Eichelbaum, K., Föehr, S., Fischer, B., You, K. T., Castelló, A., Krijgsveld, J., Hentze, M. W., & Kim, V. N. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2638 · Cited by 462
Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming
Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. A., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3473 · Cited by 467
Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone H1 binding to chromatin
Christophorou, M. A., Castelo‐Branco, G., Halley‐Stott, R. P., Oliveira, C. S., Loos, R., Radzisheuskaya, A., Mowen, K. A., Bertone, P., Silva, J., Zernicka‐Goetz, M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12942 · Cited by 409
Single-cell mapping of lineage and identity in direct reprogramming
Biddy, B. A., Kong, W., Kamimoto, K., Guo, C., Waye, S. E., Sun, T., & Morris, S. A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0744-4 · Cited by 390
Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming
Apostolou, E., & Hochedlinger, K. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12749 · Cited by 414
Self-citationSOX2 in development and cancer biology
Novak, D., Hüser, L., Elton, J. J., Umansky, V., Altevogt, P., & Utikal, J. (2020) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.007 · Cited by 328
Genetic and Epigenetic Variations in iPSCs: Potential Causes and Implications for Application
Liang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.001 · Cited by 383
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Use in Human Models of Disease and Development
Karagiannis, P., Takahashi, K., Saito, M. K., Yoshida, Y., Okita, K., Watanabe, A., Inoue, H., Yamashita, J. K., Todani, M., Nakagawa, M., et al. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00039.2017 · Cited by 391
Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, K., Wu, T., Huang, B., Liu, W., Kou, X., Zhang, Y., Huang, H., Jiang, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.02.005 · Cited by 362
Metabolic Reprogramming of Stem Cell Epigenetics
Ryall, J. G., Cliff, T. S., Dalton, S., & Sartorelli, V. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.012 · Cited by 339
Hu, X., Zhang, L., Mao, S.-Q., Li, Z., Chen, J., Zhang, R.-R., Wu, H.-P., Gao, J., Guo, F., Liu, W., et al. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.001 · Cited by 318
Glis1 facilitates induction of pluripotency via an epigenome–metabolome–epigenome signalling cascade
Li, L., Chen, K., Wang, T., Wu, Y., Xing, G., Chen, M., Hao, Z., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Ma, B., et al. (2020) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0267-9 · Cited by 317
Epigenetics of Reprogramming to Induced Pluripotency
Papp, B., & Plath, K. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.043 · Cited by 307
Evaluating cell reprogramming, differentiation and conversion technologies in neuroscience
Mertens, J., Marchetto, M. C., Bardy, C., & Gage, F. H. (2016) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.46 · Cited by 307
Induction of Pluripotency in Mouse Somatic Cells with Lineage Specifiers
Shu, J., Wu, C., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Shao, S., Zhao, W., Tang, X., Yang, H., Shen, L., Zuo, X., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.001 · Cited by 307
Mesenchymal–epithelial transition in development and reprogramming
Pei, D., Shu, X., Gassama‐Diagne, A., & Thiery, J. P. (2018) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0195-z · Cited by 306
LncBRM initiates YAP1 signalling activation to drive self-renewal of liver cancer stem cells
Zhu, P., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Huang, G., Liu, B., Ye, B., Du, Y., Gao, G., Tian, Y., He, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13608 · Cited by 297
Epigenetic changes during aging and their reprogramming potential
Kane, A. E., & Sinclair, D. A. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409238.2019.1570075 · Cited by 283
Genetic Background Drives Transcriptional Variation in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Rouhani, F., Kumasaka, N., de Brito, M. C., Bradley, A., Vallier, L., & Gaffney, D. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004432 · Cited by 294
A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types
Rackham, O. J. L., Firas, J., Fang, H., Oates, M. E., Holmes, M. L., Knaupp, A. S., Suzuki, H., Nefzger, C. M., Daub, C. O., Shin, J. W., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3487 · Cited by 288
Self-citationMoradi, S., Mahdizadeh, H., Šarić, T., Kim, J., Harati, J., Shahsavarani, H., Greber, B., & Moore, J. B. (2019) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1455-y · Cited by 313
Translation of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Sayed, N., Liu, C., & Wu, J. C. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.083 · Cited by 290
The Developmental Control of Transposable Elements and the Evolution of Higher Species
Friedli, M., & Trono, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125514 · Cited by 274
The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity
Cheloufi, S., Elling, U., Hopfgartner, B., Jung, Y. L., Murn, J., Ninova, M., Hubmann, M., Badeaux, A. I., Ang, C. E., Tenen, D. E., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15749 · Cited by 291
Self-citationPrieto, J., León, M., Ponsoda, X., Sendra, R., Bort, R., Ferrer‐Lorente, R., Raya, Á., López‐García, C., & Torres, J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11124 · Cited by 286
Defined three-dimensional microenvironments boost induction of pluripotency
Caiazzo, M., Okawa, Y., Ranga, A., Piersigilli, A., Tabata, Y., & Lutolf, M. P. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4536 · Cited by 271
A Comparative View on Human Somatic Cell Sources for iPSC Generation
Raab, S., Klingenstein, M., Liebau, S., & Linta, L. (2014) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2014/768391 · Cited by 263
A XEN-like State Bridges Somatic Cells to Pluripotency during Chemical Reprogramming.
Zhao, Y., Zhao, T., Guan, J.-Y., Zhang, X., Fu, Y., Ye, J., Zhu, J., Meng, G., Ge, J., Yang, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.017 · Cited by 249
Self-citationPrigione, A., Rohwer, N., Hoffmann, S., Mlody, B., Drews, K., Bukowiecki, R., Blümlein, K., Wanker, E. E., Ralser, M., Cramer, T., et al. (2013) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1552 · Cited by 256
Chromatin Accessibility Dynamics during iPSC Reprogramming
Li, D., Liu, J., Yang, X., Zhou, C., Guo, J., Wu, C., Qin, Y., Guo, L., He, J., Yu, S., et al. (2017) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2017.10.012 · Cited by 251
Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency
Hansson, J., Rafiee, M. R., Reiland, S., Polo, J. M., Gehring, J., Okawa, S., Huber, W., Hochedlinger, K., & Krijgsveld, J. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.014 · Cited by 229
Self-citationTranscription Factors Drive Tet2-Mediated Enhancer Demethylation to Reprogram Cell Fate
Sardina, J. L., Collombet, S., Tian, T. V., Gómez, A., Stefano, B. D., Berenguer, C., Brumbaugh, J., Stadhouders, R., Segura-Morales, C., Gut, M., et al. (2018) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.08.016 · Cited by 242
Self-citationSridharan, R., Gonzales-Cope, M., Chronis, C., Bonora, G., McKee, R., Huang, C., Patel, S., Lopez, D., Mishra, N., Pellegrini, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2768 · Cited by 220
Integrative Analyses of Human Reprogramming Reveal Dynamic Nature of Induced Pluripotency
Cacchiarelli, D., Trapnell, C., Ziller, M. J., Soumillon, M., Cesana, M., Karnik, R., Donaghey, J., Smith, Z. D., Ratanasirintrawoot, S., Zhang, X., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.016 · Cited by 240
Influence of donor age on induced pluripotent stem cells
Lo Sardo, V., Ferguson, W., Erikson, G. A., Topol, E. J., Baldwin, K. K., & Torkamani, A. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3749 · Cited by 223
Apostolou, E., Ferrari, F., Walsh, R. M., Bar‐Nur, O., Stadtfeld, M., Cheloufi, S., Stuart, H. T., Polo, J. M., Ohsumi, T. K., Borowsky, M. L., et al. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013 · Cited by 222
Self-citationSingle-cell transcriptomics reconstructs fate conversion from fibroblast to cardiomyocyte
Liu, Z., Wang, L., Welch, J. D., Ma, H., Zhou, Y., Vaseghi, H. R., Yu, S., Wall, J. B., Alimohamadi, S., Zheng, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24454 · Cited by 222
Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency
Hussein, S. M. I., Puri, M. C., Tonge, P. D., Benevento, M., Corso, A. J., Clancy, J. L., Mosbergen, R., Li, M., Lee, D.-S., Cloonan, N., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14046 · Cited by 197
Mathieu, J., Zhou, W., Xing, Y., Sperber, H., Ferreccio, A., Agoston, Z., Kuppusamy, K. T., Moon, R. T., & Ruohola‐Baker, H. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.012 · Cited by 217
Hu, X., Huang, X., Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., Qiu, D., Wu, Y., Wu, G., & Lei, L. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae183 · Cited by 213
Omole, A. E., & Fakoya, A. O. J. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4370 · Cited by 223
Reprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells
Liu, X., Ouyang, J. F., Rossello, F. J., Tan, J. P., Davidson, K. C., Valdes, D. S., Schröder, J., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Knaupp, A. S., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2734-6 · Cited by 202
Self-citationWang, S., Xia, P., Ye, B., Huang, G., Liu, J., & Fan, Z. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.005 · Cited by 209
Bao, X., Wu, H., Zhu, X., Guo, X., Hutchins, A. P., Luo, Z., Song, H., Chen, Y., Lai, K., Yin, M., et al. (2014) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2014.165 · Cited by 189
Multi-omic rejuvenation of human cells by maturation phase transient reprogramming
Gill, D., Parry, A., Santos, F., Okkenhaug, H., Todd, C. D., Hernando-Herraez, I., Stubbs, T. M., Milagre, I., & Reik, W. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.71624 · Cited by 185
Zunder, E. R., Lujan, E., Goltsev, Y., Wernig, M., & Nolan, G. P. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.015 · Cited by 180
Valamehr, B. B., Robinson, M., Abujarour, R., Rezner, B., Vranceanu, F., Le, T. M., Medcalf, A., Lee, T. T., Fitch, M., Robbins, D., et al. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.01.014 · Cited by 185
Giammartino, D. C. D., Kloetgen, A., Polyzos, A., Liu, Y., Kim, D., Murphy, D., Abuhashem, A., Cavaliere, P., Aronson, B. E., Shah, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0390-6 · Cited by 179
Self-citationWang, L., Du, Y., Ward, J. M., Shimbo, T., Lackford, B. L., Zheng, X., Miao, Y., Zhou, B., Han, L., Fargo, D. C., et al. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.013 · Cited by 175
Collier, A. J., Panula, S., Schell, J. P., Chovanec, P., Reyes, Á. P., Sophie Petropoulos, A., Corcoran, A. E., Walker, R. V., Douagi, I., Lanner, F., et al. (2017) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.014 · Cited by 178
Reprogramming of cell fate: epigenetic memory and the erasure of memories past
Nashun, B., Hill, P. W. S., & Hájková, P. (2015) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201490649 · Cited by 184
Nonstochastic Reprogramming from a Privileged Somatic Cell State
Guo, S., Zi, X., Schulz, V., Cheng, J., Zhong, M., Koochaki, S., Megyola, C. M., Pan, X., Heydari, K., Weissman, S. M., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.020 · Cited by 174
Present and future challenges of induced pluripotent stem cells
Ohnuki, M., & Takahashi, K. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0367 · Cited by 182
Liu, X., Nefzger, C. M., Rossello, F. J., Chen, J., Knaupp, A. S., Firas, J., Ford, E., Pflueger, J., Paynter, J. M., Chy, H. S., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4436 · Cited by 168
Self-citationMechanisms that regulate the activities of TET proteins
Joshi, K., Liu, S., Breslin, P., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04396-x · Cited by 177
Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Dynamic Changes in lncRNA Expression during Reprogramming
Kim, D. H., Marinov, G. K., Pepke, S., Singer, Z. S., He, P., Williams, B. A., Schroth, G. P., Elowitz, M. B., & Wold, B. J. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.11.005 · Cited by 169
Welch, J. D., Hartemink, A. J., & Prins, J. F. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1269-0 · Cited by 140
Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and precision oncology
Papapetrou, E. P. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4238 · Cited by 163
Turning back time with emerging rejuvenation strategies
Mahmoudi, S., Xu, L., & Brunet, A. (2018) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0206-0 · Cited by 171
OCT4: Dynamic DNA binding pioneers stem cell pluripotency
Jerabek, S., Merino, F., Schöler, H. R., & Cojocaru, V. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.10.001 · Cited by 163
Molecular features of cellular reprogramming and development
Smith, Z. D., Sindhu, C., & Meissner, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.6 · Cited by 155
Human pancreatic beta-like cells converted from fibroblasts
Zhu, S.-Y., Russ, H., Wang, X., Zhang, M., Ma, T.-H., Xu, T., Tang, S.-B., Hebrok, M., & Ding, S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10080 · Cited by 145
NRF2 Orchestrates the Metabolic Shift during Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Reprogramming
Hawkins, K., Joy, S., Delhove, J. M. K. M., Kotiadis, V. N., Fernández, E., FitzPatrick, L. M., Whiteford, J. R., King, P., Bolaños, J. P., Duchen, M. R., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.003 · Cited by 150
High-resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells
O’Malley, A. J., Skylaki, S., Iwabuchi, K. A., Chantzoura, E., Ruetz, T. J., Johnsson, A., Tomlinson, S. R., Linnarsson, S., & Kaji, K. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12243 · Cited by 150
Nudt21 Controls Cell Fate by Connecting Alternative Polyadenylation to Chromatin Signaling
Brumbaugh, J., Stefano, B. D., Wang, X., Borkent, M., Forouzmand, E., Clowers, K. J., Ji, F., Schwarz, B. A., Kalocsay, M., Elledge, S. J., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.023 · Cited by 148
Self-citationTGF-β Family Signaling in Embryonic and Somatic Stem-Cell Renewal and DifferentiationPreprint
Mullen, A. C., & Wrana, J. L. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a022186 · Cited by 149
Direct activation of human and mouse Oct4 genes using engineered TALE and Cas9 transcription factors
Hu, J., Lei, Y., Wong, W.-K., Liu, S., Lee, K.-C., He, X., You, W., Zhou, R., Guo, J., Chen, X., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku109 · Cited by 145
Multi-omic Profiling Reveals Dynamics of the Phased Progression of Pluripotency
Yang, P., Humphrey, S. J., Cinghu, S., Pathania, R., Oldfield, A. J., Kumar, D., Perera, D., Yang, J. Y. H., James, D. E., Mann, M., et al. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.012 · Cited by 146
SUMO Safeguards Somatic and Pluripotent Cell Identities by Enforcing Distinct Chromatin States
Cossec, J., Theurillat, I., Chica, C., Búa, S., Gaume, X., Andrieux, A., Iturbide, A., Jouvion, G., Li, H., Bossis, G., et al. (2018) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.001 · Cited by 144
Molecular Obstacles to Clinical Translation of iPSCs
Tapia, N., & Schöler, H. R. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.017 · Cited by 141
Krüppel-like factors in mammalian stem cells and development
Bialkowska, A. B., Yang, V. W., & Mallipattu, S. K. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.145441 · Cited by 145
Divergent reprogramming routes lead to alternative stem-cell states
Tonge, P. D., Corso, A. J., Monetti, C., Hussein, S. M. I., Puri, M. C., Michael, I. P., Li, M., Lee, D.-S., Mar, J. C., Cloonan, N., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14047 · Cited by 138
Beagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004 · Cited by 134
Self-citationMolecular Control of Induced Pluripotency
Theunissen, T. W., & Jaenisch, R. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.002 · Cited by 137
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Reprogramming Platforms and Applications in Cell Replacement Therapy
Abbar, A. A., Ngai, S. C., Nograles, N., Alhaji, S. Y., & Abdullah, S. (2020) · BioResearch open access · doi:10.1089/biores.2019.0046 · Cited by 144
A blueprint for engineering cell fate: current technologies to reprogram cell identity
Morris, S. A., & Daley, G. Q. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.1 · Cited by 131
Sadahiro, T., Yamanaka, S., & Ieda, M. (2015) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.116.305374 · Cited by 132
Synthetic hydrogels mimicking basement membrane matrices to promote cell-matrix interactions
Cruz‐Acuña, R., & Garcı́a, A. J. (2016) · Matrix Biology · doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2016.06.002 · Cited by 133
Li, Q., Hutchins, A. P., Chen, Y., Li, S., Shan, Y., Liao, B., Zheng, D., Shi, X., Li, Y., Chan, W., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15166 · Cited by 129
Tanabe, K., Nakamura, M., Narita, M., Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310291110 · Cited by 131
Nam, Y., Lubczyk, C., Bhakta, M., Zang, T., Fernandez-Perez, A., McAnally, J., Bassel‐Duby, R., Olson, E. N., & Munshi, N. V. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.114025 · Cited by 130
Excluding Oct4 from Yamanaka Cocktail Unleashes the Developmental Potential of iPSCs
Velychko, S., Adachi, K., Kim, K.-P., Hou, Y., MacCarthy, C. M., Wu, G., & Schöler, H. R. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.10.002 · Cited by 137
Powell, C., Grant, A. R., Cornblath, E. J., & Goldman, D. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1312009110 · Cited by 128
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Sasaki, A., Yamamoto, M., Nakamura, M., Sutou, K., Osafune, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4678 · Cited by 131
ERRs Mediate a Metabolic Switch Required for Somatic Cell Reprogramming to Pluripotency
Kida, Y. S., Kawamura, T., Wei, Z., Sogo, T., Jacinto, S. H., Shigeno, A., Kushige, H., Yoshihara, E., Liddle, C., Ecker, J. R., et al. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.03.001 · Cited by 128
Nguyen, V. T. M., Barozzi, I., Faronato, M., Lombardo, Y., Steel, J. H., Patel, N. R., Darbre, P. D., Castellano, L., Győrffy, B., Woodley, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10044 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Polo, J. M., Anderssen, E., Walsh, R. M., Schwarz, B. A., Nefzger, C. M., Lim, S. M., Borkent, M., Apostolou, E., Alaei, S., Cloutier, J., Bar-Nur, O., Cheloufi, S., Stadtfeld, M., Figueroa, M. E., Robinton, D., Natesan, S., Melnick, A., Zhu, J., Ramaswamy, S., & Hochedlinger, K.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Monash University (AU)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramaswamy, Sridhar
- Hochedlinger, Konrad
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1617-1632
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3608203
- OpenAlex
- W2060613703
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 385 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (1dp2od003266-01)
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA009216)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099117)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001169)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD058013)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- induced pluripotent stem cells, cellular reprogramming, c-Myc, KLF4, Oct4, SOX2, bivalent domains, DNA methylation, cell surface markers, pluripotency
- MeSH terms
- Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Animals, Cytological Techniques, Humans, Transcription Factors, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review