Cited by 658Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and PsychologyMedia and Digital Communication

Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites

Open access
Wilson, Kathryn, Fornasier, Stephanie, White, Katherine M.·2010·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Young people are increasingly using social networking sites (SNSs) like MySpace and Facebook to engage with others. The use of SNSs can have both positive and negative effects on the individual; however, few studies identify the types of people who frequent these Internet sites. This study sought to predict young adults' use of SNSs and addictive tendency toward the use of SNSs from their personality characteristics and levels of self-esteem. University students (N = 201), aged 17 to 24 years, reported their use of SNSs and addictive tendencies for SNSs use and completed the NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory and the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory. Multiple regression analyses revealed that, as a group, the personality and self-esteem factors significantly predicted both level of SNS use and addictive tendency but did not explain a large amount of variance in either outcome measure. The findings indicated that extroverted and unconscientious individuals reported higher levels of both SNS use and addictive tendencies. Future research should attempt to identify which other psychosocial characteristics explain young people's level of use and propensity for addictive tendencies for these popular Internet sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2009.0094

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wilson et al.'s study suffered from endorsing only three potential addiction criteria, which is not sufficient for establishing addiction status clinically.

    “Wilson et al.’s study [82] suffered from endorsing only three potential addiction criteria which is not sufficient for establishing addiction status clinically.”

    From Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature (2011) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Addictive tendencies scale section (page unavailable) says the study measured three items: salience, loss of control, and withdrawal. The introductory passage describes six central components of addiction, and the Discussion (page unavailable) questions whether the scale measures addictive tendencies at all. The paper does not state a clinical diagnostic threshold or explicitly conclude that three criteria are insufficient to establish addiction status clinically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High extraversion and low conscientiousness scores significantly predicted both addictive tendencies and the time spent using an SNS.

    “The results of a multiple regression analysis indicated that high extraversion and low conscientiousness scores significantly predicted both addictive tendencies and the time spent using an SNS.”

    From Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature (2011) · cites this paper as [82]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The relationship between extraversion and addictive tendencies could be explained by the fact that using SNSs satisfies the extraverts' need to socialize.

    “The researchers suggested that the relationship between extraversion and addictive tendencies could be explained by the fact that using SNSs satisfies the extraverts’ need to socialize [82].”
  • Significant impairment and negative consequences that discriminate addiction from mere abuse were not assessed in Wilson et al.'s study at all.

    “Similarly, significant impairment and negative consequences that discriminate addiction from mere abuse [18] were not assessed in this study at all.”
  • High extraversion is related to potential addiction to using SNS, in accordance with low conscientiousness.

    “Nevertheless, of those, high extraversion was found to be related to potential addiction to using SNS, in accordance with low conscientiousness [82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2]2. Coopersmith S. (1981) Self-esteem inventories. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
  2. [5]5. Walsh SP, White KM, Young RM. (2007) Young and connected: Psychological influences of mobile phone use amongst Australian youth. In: Goggin G, Hjorth L, eds. Mobile Media 2007: Proceedings of an international conference on social and cultural aspects of mobile phones, media, and wireless technologies. Sydney: University of Sydney, pp.125-34.
  3. [19]19. Griffiths MD. (1998) Internet addiction: does it really exist? In: Gackenbach J, eds. Psychology and the Internet: intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal applications. New York: Academic Press, pp. 61-75.
  4. [20]20. Griffiths MD. Internet addiction. Psychologist 1999; 12:246-50.
  5. [21]21. Hardie E, Tee M. Excessive Internet use: The role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in Internet addiction. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 2007; 5:34-47.
  6. [28]28. Aviram I, Amichai-Hamburger Y. Online infidelity: aspects of dyadic satisfaction, self disclosure and narcissism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 10:article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol 1 0/issue3/aviram.html (accessed May 11, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2010-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
173-177
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2072772428
Cited by
658
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 26
FWCI
91.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social networking sites, young adults, internet addiction, personality traits, self-esteem, extraversion, conscientiousness, Facebook, MySpace, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality, Personality Assessment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Environment, Social Support, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review