Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use

Junco, Reynol·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Hald, 2003, Evaluation of objective measures of smoking status—A prospective clinical study in a group of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, Acta Oncologica, 42, 154, 10.1080/02841860310005020 · DOI
  2. Junco, 2012, Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Junco, 2012, The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement, Computers & Education, 58, 162, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Junco, 2012, In-class multitasking and academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2236, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Junco, 2012, No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance, Computers & Education, 59, 505, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kolek, 2008, Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles, NASPA Journal, 45, 1, 10.2202/1949-6605.1905 · doi:10.2202/1949-6605.1905 · Paper page
  7. Kujath, 2011, Facebook and MySpace. Complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 75, 10.1089/cyber.2009.0311 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Otten, 2010, Relationship between self-report and an objective measure of television-viewing time in adults, Obesity, 18, 1273, 10.1038/oby.2009.371 · DOI
  9. Roblyer, 2010, Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites, The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Vitak, 2011, It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 107, 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Junco, R.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
626-631
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999246676
Cited by
371
References
12
FWCI
106.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.