The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data suggest that, in both countries, forwarding sexual content featuring someone without their consent is a form of harassment that, when it occurs, is often associated with other more frequent and normalised forms of online sexual aggression (Clancy et al., 2019; Gámez-Guadix et al., 2022b; Ybarra & Thompson, 2018), such as the direct and ambiguous forms measured in this study.”
From Online Sexual Harassment Perpetration Among Peer Adolescents: A Cross-National and Cross-Gender Study (2025) · cites this paper as Clancy et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“whereas four studies found that women were more likely than men to engage in the nonconsensual sharing of other people’s intimate images, although the difference was small in Hu et al. (2023) and Clancy et al. (2019)”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2019)
In the citing paper
“These findings were consistent with their previous study (Clancy et al., 2019), where “it was no big deal” or “as a joke, to be funny” were the most frequently endorsed reasons, and men being more likely to agree that sext dissemination can enhance social status (40.7% vs. 5.0%).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Motivations related to bragging or improving social status were more likely to be reported by men compared to women according to one study (Clancy et al., 2019).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
Costa, P. T., & McCrea, R. B. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,758
Edwards, A. L. (1953) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058073 · Cited by 653
Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007 · Cited by 615
Self-citationSexting, Substance Use, and Sexual Risk Behavior in Young Adults
Benotsch, E. G., Snipes, D. J., Martin, A. M., & Bull, S. S. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.011 · Cited by 360
Prevalence and Correlates of Sexting Behavior in Adolescents
Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., Maziarz, L. N., & Ward, B. L. (2012) · American Journal of Sexuality Education · doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.650959 · Cited by 355
Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2014.923009 · Cited by 323
Beyond the ‘sext’: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women
Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865814524218 · Cited by 283
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dawkins, 2015, A dish served cold: The case for criminalising revenge pornography, Cumberland Law Review, 45, 395
- Ronay, 2014, Adults post the darndest things: [ctrl + shift] freedom of speech to [esc] our past, The University of Toledo Law Review, 46, 73
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moor, L., & Anderson, J. R. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027 · Cited by 231
The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Patel, U., & Roesch, R. (2022) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838020958057 · Cited by 175
Only sluts love sexting: youth, sexual norms and non-consensual sharing of digital sexual images
Naezer, M., & van Oosterhout, L. (2021) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1799767 · Cited by 140
Psychological Risk Factors that Predict Social Networking and Internet Addiction in Adolescents
Peris, M., de la Barrera, U., Schoeps, K., & Montoya‐Castilla, I. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17124598 · Cited by 162
Gámez-Guadix, M., & Incera, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106728 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Hallford, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Clancy, Elizabeth M.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 266-272
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900469320
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- sexting, Dark Triad personality, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, subjective norms, sexual activity, young adults, online sexual behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
