Cited by 69Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Sharing is not always caring: Understanding motivations and behavioural associations with sext dissemination.

Open access
Clancy, Elizabeth M., Klettke, Bianca, Hallford, David J., Crossman, Angela M., Maas, Megan K., Toumbourou, John W.·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106460

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clancy et al. (2020) found most popular reasons for sharing intimate images without consent were 'the person was hot' (44.2%), 'as a joke, to be funny' (28.3%), or 'it was not a big deal' (23.3%).

    “Clancy et al. (2020) similarly found that the most popular reasons for sharing intimate images without consent was because “the person was hot” (44.2%), “as a joke, to be funny” (28.3%), or “it was not a big deal” (23.3%).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)

  • Clancy et al. (2020) found disseminating an intimate image 'for fun, or as a joke' was significantly associated with Machiavellianism, but not psychopathy or narcissism.

    “Clancy et al. (2020) found that disseminating an intimate image “for fun, or as a joke” was significantly associated with Machiavellianism, but not psychopathy or narcissism.”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)

  • Clancy et al. (2020) found other reasons included bragging (22.7%), gossiping (16.7%), and attention-seeking (15.0%); few gave reasons of revenge or harm (5.8%).

    “Other reasons selected by study respondents included: bragging (22.7%), gossiping (16.7%), and attention-seeking (15.0%). Few respondents gave reasons of revenge or harm (5.8%).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)

  • Clancy et al. (2020) found men more likely than women to endorse reasons related to attractiveness (60.4% vs 31.3%), improving social status (18.9% vs 2.9%), and bragging (26.4% vs 9.0%).

    “They also found that men were more likely than women to endorse reasons related to attractiveness (60.4% vs. 31.3%), as well as improving social status (18.9% vs. 2.9%), and motivations related to bragging (26.4% men vs. 9.0% women).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)

  • Clancy et al. (2020) found those who were sexually active were more likely to engage in nonconsensual sharing than those who were not (17.0% vs 1.6%).

    “And Clancy et al. (2020) found that those who were sexually active were more likely to engage in the behavior than those who were not (17.0% vs. 1.6%).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Crossman, A. M., Maas, M. K., & Toumbourou, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Clancy, Elizabeth M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
112
Pages
106460
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037898692
Cited by
69
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
sexting, young adults, dark triad traits, narcissism, social exchange theory, sexual activity, gender differences, consent, revenge, attractiveness, humour, social status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review