Sharing is not always caring: Understanding motivations and behavioural associations with sext dissemination.
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clancy et al. (2020) found most popular reasons for sharing intimate images without consent were 'the person was hot' (44.2%), 'as a joke, to be funny' (28.3%), or 'it was not a big deal' (23.3%).
“Clancy et al. (2020) similarly found that the most popular reasons for sharing intimate images without consent was because “the person was hot” (44.2%), “as a joke, to be funny” (28.3%), or “it was not a big deal” (23.3%).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
Clancy et al. (2020) found disseminating an intimate image 'for fun, or as a joke' was significantly associated with Machiavellianism, but not psychopathy or narcissism.
“Clancy et al. (2020) found that disseminating an intimate image “for fun, or as a joke” was significantly associated with Machiavellianism, but not psychopathy or narcissism.”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
Clancy et al. (2020) found other reasons included bragging (22.7%), gossiping (16.7%), and attention-seeking (15.0%); few gave reasons of revenge or harm (5.8%).
“Other reasons selected by study respondents included: bragging (22.7%), gossiping (16.7%), and attention-seeking (15.0%). Few respondents gave reasons of revenge or harm (5.8%).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
Clancy et al. (2020) found men more likely than women to endorse reasons related to attractiveness (60.4% vs 31.3%), improving social status (18.9% vs 2.9%), and bragging (26.4% vs 9.0%).
“They also found that men were more likely than women to endorse reasons related to attractiveness (60.4% vs. 31.3%), as well as improving social status (18.9% vs. 2.9%), and motivations related to bragging (26.4% men vs. 9.0% women).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
Clancy et al. (2020) found those who were sexually active were more likely to engage in nonconsensual sharing than those who were not (17.0% vs 1.6%).
“And Clancy et al. (2020) found that those who were sexually active were more likely to engage in the behavior than those who were not (17.0% vs. 1.6%).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
The association between victimization and perpetration was not found in Clancy et al. (2020).
“The association between victimization and perpetration, however, was not found in the study by Clancy et al. (2020).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2020)
Cites
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265 · see citing works
Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700113499853 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Bates, S. (2017) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/1557085116654565 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Moor, L., & Anderson, J. R. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Walker, K., & Sleath, E. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.010 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts
Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Hallford, D. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.023 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationKrieger, M. A. (2017) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016659486 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gámez‐Guadix, M., Mateos‐Pérez, E., Wachs, S., Wright, M., Martínez, J., & Íncera, D. (2022) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12064 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review
Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241266137 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Conversely, Clancy et al. (2020) found that disseminating an intimate image “for fun, or as a joke” was significantly associated with Machiavellianism, but not psychopathy or narcissism.”
BackgroundInfluentialSparks, B., Stephens, S., & Trendell, S. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107879 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Constructing Offender Typologies From Judicial Data: A Clustering Analysis of Sextortion Cases
Wang, F., & Pei, W. (2026) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/10790632261434143
“…in sextortion and related forms of image-based abuse, cyberviolence, and of fl ine delinquency, often attributed to learned behaviors, dysfunctional coping, or retaliatory motives (Chan & Wong, 2020; Clancy et al., 2020; G´amez-Guadix et al., 2023; Patchin & Hinduja, 2020; Posick, 2013).”
- Authors
- Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Crossman, A. M., Maas, M. K., & Toumbourou, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- City University of New York (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clancy, Elizabeth M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 106460
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037898692
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- sexting, young adults, dark triad traits, narcissism, social exchange theory, sexual activity, gender differences, consent, revenge, attractiveness, humour, social status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review