Cited by 123Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The relevance of emotion regulation, procrastination, and perceived stress for problematic social media use in a representative sample of children and adolescents

Open access
Wartberg, Lutz, Thomasius, Rainer, Paschke, Kerstin·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Social media use is widespread among minors. Already children and adolescents can be affected by a problematic social media use (PSMU). Deficits in emotion regulation are becoming increasingly important as an explanation for psychological strain. In the present study, associations between different facets of emotion regulation and PSMU in childhood and adolescence were investigated for the first time. In a representative sample of 1221 10- to 17-year-olds, standardized questionnaires were used to survey PSMU, emotion regulation, procrastination, and perceived stress. We used correlation and multivariable regression analyses to determine the associations. Bivariate statistically significant relations were found between PSMU and lower age, more pronounced problems in all six facets of emotion regulation, procrastination, and stress. In the multivariable regression, PSMU was associated with lower age, stronger impulse control difficulties, stronger difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior, stronger procrastination and higher perceived stress (Corrected R2 = 0.26). For the first time, the importance of emotion regulation (especially difficulties in impulse control and goal-oriented behavior), procrastination and perceived stress for PSMU in childhood and adolescence was observed. In prevention measures, deficits in emotion regulation or coping strategies and dealing with procrastination could be addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106788

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wartberg, L., Thomasius, R., & Paschke, K.
Affiliations
  • MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Wartberg, Lutz
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
121
Pages
106788
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137174311
Cited by
123
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
24.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
DAK-Gesundheit
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media addiction, emotion regulation, procrastination, perceived stress, children and adolescents, impulse control difficulties, goal-directed behavior, age differences, prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review