Cited by 147Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery MethodsClick Chemistry and Applications

Targeting the Undruggable Proteome: The Small Molecules of My Dreams

Open access
Crews, Craig M.·2010·Chemistry & Biology

Abstract

Biologically active small molecules have long proven useful in the exploration of cell biology. Although many early compounds were by-products of drug development efforts, recent increased small molecule screening efforts in academia have expanded the repertoire of biological processes investigated to include areas of biology that are not of immediate pharmaceutical interest. Many of these new bioassays score for small molecule-induced phenotypic changes at the cellular or even organismal level and thus have been described as "chemical genetic" screens. However, this analogy with traditional genetic screens is misleading; although each gene has roughly an equivalent chance of being mutated in a traditional genetic screen, the amount of "proteomic space" that a chemical genetics approach can reach using current small molecule libraries is considerably smaller. Thus, new chemical biology methodologies are needed to target the remaining "undruggable proteome" with small druglike molecules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.011

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the potential to degrade nearly 80% of human intracellular proteins, PROTAC technology has broad applications across various fields, most notably in cancer therapy.

    “With the potential to degrade nearly 80% of human intracellular proteins, PROTAC technology has broad applications across various fields, most notably in cancer therapy.483”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Crews, Craig M.
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
551-555
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074440680
Cited by
147
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R33CA118631)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
small molecules, chemical genetics, chemical screen, small molecule library, phenotypic assays, drug discovery, chemical biology
MeSH terms
Animals, Genetics, Humans, Drug Design, Proteome, Small Molecule Libraries, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review