Cited by 599Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Targeted protein degradation by PROTACs

Neklesa, Taavi K., Winkler, James D., Crews, Craig M.·2017·Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation using the PROTAC technology is emerging as a novel therapeutic method to address diseases driven by the aberrant expression of a disease-causing protein. PROTAC molecules are bifunctional small molecules that simultaneously bind a target protein and an E3-ubiquitin ligase, thus causing ubiquitination and degradation of the target protein by the proteasome. Like small molecules, PROTAC molecules possess good tissue distribution and the ability to target intracellular proteins. Herein, we highlight the advantages of protein degradation using PROTACs, and provide specific examples where degradation offers therapeutic benefit over classical enzyme inhibition. Foremost, PROTACs can degrade proteins regardless of their function. This includes the currently "undruggable" proteome, which comprises approximately 85% of all human proteins. Other beneficial aspects of protein degradation include the ability to target overexpressed and mutated proteins, as well as the potential to demonstrate prolonged pharmacodynamics effect beyond drug exposure. Lastly, due to their catalytic nature and the pre-requisite ubiquitination step, an exquisitely potent molecules with a high degree of degradation selectivity can be designed. Impressive preclinical in vitro and in vivo PROTAC data have been published, and these data have propelled the development of clinically viable PROTACs. With the molecular weight falling in the 700-1000Da range, the delivery and bioavailability of PROTACs remain the largest hurdles on the way to the clinic. Solving these issues and demonstrating proof of concept clinical data will be the focus of many labs over the next few years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.027

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neklesa, T. K., Winkler, J. D., & Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Arvinas (United States) (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Neklesa, Taavi K.
Venue
Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
174
Pages
138-144
ISSN
0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589026097
Cited by
599
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 13
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R44CA203199)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, bifunctional small molecules, E3 ubiquitin ligase, ubiquitination, proteasome, undruggable proteins, protein overexpression, pharmacodynamics, bioavailability, drug delivery
MeSH terms
Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Molecular Weight, Proteins, Drug Design, Drug Delivery Systems, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Ubiquitination, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review