Cited by 198Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWastewater Treatment and ReuseMembrane Separation Technologies

Removal of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluoroalkyl acids at water reclamation plants in South East Queensland Australia

Thompson, Jack, Eaglesham, Geoff, Reungoat, Julien, Poussade, Yvan, Bartkow, Michael, Lawrence, Michael, Mueller, Jochen F.·2011·Chemosphere

Abstract

This paper examines the fate of perfluorinated sulfonates (PFSAs) and carboxylic acids (PFCAs) in two water reclamation plants in Australia. Both facilities take treated water directly from WWTPs and treat it further to produce high quality recycled water. The first plant utilizes adsorption and filtration methods alongside ozonation, whilst the second uses membrane processes and advanced oxidation to produce purified recycled water. At both facilities perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) were the most frequently detected PFCs. Concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in influent (WWTP effluent) ranged up to 3.7 and 16 ng L⁻¹ respectively, and were reduced to 0.7 and 12 ng L⁻¹ in the finished water of the ozonation plant. Throughout this facility, concentrations of most of the detected perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs) remained relatively unchanged with each successive treatment step. PFOS was an exception to this, with some removal following coagulation and dissolved air flotation/sand filtration (DAFF). At the second plant, influent concentrations of PFOS and PFOA ranged up to 39 and 29 ng L⁻¹. All PFCs present were removed from the finished water by reverse osmosis (RO) to concentrations below detection and reporting limits (0.4-1.5 ng L⁻¹). At both plants the observed concentrations were in the low parts per trillion range, well below provisional health based drinking water guidelines suggested for PFOS and PFOA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.040

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, J., Eaglesham, G., Reungoat, J., Poussade, Y., Bartkow, M., Lawrence, M., & Mueller, J. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
  • Veolia (Australia) (AU)
  • Seqwater (AU)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Jack
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000984489
Cited by
198
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Queensland Health
  • University of Queensland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFHxS, perfluorohexanoic acid, perfluoroalkyl acids, water reclamation plant, reclaimed water, wastewater treatment plant effluent, ozonation, reverse osmosis, advanced oxidation processes, dissolved air flotation, adsorption, membrane treatment, PFOS removal
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Fluorocarbons, Fresh Water, Ozone, Queensland, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review