Cited by 221Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWater Treatment and DisinfectionAdvanced oxidation water treatment

Occurrence of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in N.E. Spanish surface waters and their removal in a drinking water treatment plant that combines conventional and advanced treatments in parallel lines

Flores, Cintia, Ventura, Francesc, Martin-Alonso, Jordi, Caixach, Josep·2013·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are two emerging contaminants that have been detected in all environmental compartments. However, while most of the studies in the literature deal with their presence or removal in wastewater treatment, few of them are devoted to their detection in treated drinking water and fate during drinking water treatment. In this study, analyses of PFOS and PFOA have been carried out in river water samples and in the different stages of a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) which has recently improved its conventional treatment process by adding ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis in a parallel treatment line. Conventional and advanced treatments have been studied in several pilot plants and in the DWTP, which offers the opportunity to compare both treatments operating simultaneously. From the results obtained, neither preoxidation, sand filtration, nor ozonation, removed both perfluorinated compounds. As advanced treatments, reverse osmosis has proved more effective than reverse electrodialysis to remove PFOA and PFOS in the different configurations of pilot plants assayed. Granular activated carbon with an average elimination efficiency of 64±11% and 45±19% for PFOS and PFOA, respectively and especially reverse osmosis, which was able to remove ≥99% of both compounds, were the sole effective treatment steps. Trace levels of PFOS (3.0-21 ng/L) and PFOA (<4.2-5.5 ng/L) detected in treated drinking water were significantly lowered in comparison to those measured in precedent years. These concentrations represent overall removal efficiencies of 89±22% for PFOA and 86±7% for PFOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.026

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Moody CA, Hebert GN, Strauss SH, Field JA. Occurrence and persistence of perfluorooctane sulfonate and other fluorinated surfactants in groundwater at a fire-training area at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan USA. J Environ Monit 2003;5:341-5.
  2. Sinclair E, Kannan K. Perfluoroalkyl surfactants in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:1408-14.
  3. Skutlarek D, Exner M, Färber H. Perfluorinated surfactants in surface and drinking waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2006;13(5):299-307.
  4. Compounds 2007;69:990-3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flores, C., Ventura, F., Martin-Alonso, J., & Caixach, J.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Caixach, Josep
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
461-462
Pages
618-626
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083188777
Cited by
221
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorinated compounds, drinking water treatment, reverse osmosis, reverse electrodialysis, granular activated carbon, ozonation, sand filtration, pre-oxidation, ultrafiltration, river pollution, emerging contaminants, removal efficiency
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Charcoal, Chromatography, Liquid, Filtration, Fluorocarbons, Fresh Water, Spain, Water Supply, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review