Cited by 115Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWastewater Treatment and ReusePharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Parameters affecting the formation of perfluoroalkyl acids during wastewater treatment

Guerra, P., Kim, M., Kinsman, L., Ng, T., Alaee, M., Smyth, S.A.·2014·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

This study examined the fate and behaviour of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in liquid and solid samples from five different wastewater treatment types: facultative and aerated lagoons, chemically assisted primary treatment, secondary aerobic biological treatment, and advanced biological nutrient removal treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest data set from a single study available in the literature to date for PFAAs monitoring study in wastewater treatment. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was the predominant PFAA in wastewater with levels from 2.2 to 150ng/L (influent) and 1.9 to 140ng/L (effluent). Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was the predominant compound in primary sludge, waste biological sludge, and treated biosolids with concentrations from 6.4 to 2900ng/g dry weight (dw), 9.7 to 8200ng/gdw, and 2.1 to 17,000ng/gdw, respectively. PFAAs were formed during wastewater treatment and it was dependant on both process temperature and treatment type; with higher rates of formation in biological wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) operating at longer hydraulic retention times and higher temperatures. PFAA removal by sorption was influenced by different sorption tendencies; median log values of the solid-liquid distribution coefficient estimated from wastewater biological sludge and final effluent were: PFOS (3.73)>PFDA (3.68)>PFNA (3.25)>PFOA (2.49)>PFHxA (1.93). Mass balances confirmed the formation of PFAAs, low PFAA removal by sorption, and high PFAA levels in effluents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.016

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerra, P., Kim, M., Kinsman, L., Ng, T., Alaee, M., & Smyth, S. A.
Affiliations
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Smyth, S.A.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
272
Pages
148-154
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080213917
Cited by
115
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, wastewater treatment, biological sludge, biosolids, sorption, solid-liquid distribution coefficient, hydraulic retention time, processing temperature, mass balance, effluent contamination
MeSH terms
Canada, Caprylates, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Seasons, Sewage, Solubility, Temperature, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review