Cited by 383Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Gender differences in social reactions to abuse disclosures, post-abuse coping, and PTSD of child sexual abuse survivors

Ullman, Sarah E., Filipas, Henrietta H.·2005·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective This research examines the understudied issue of gender differences in disclosure, social reactions, post-abuse coping, and PTSD of adult survivors of child sexual abuse (CSA). Method Data were collected on a cross-sectional convenience sample of 733 college students completing a confidential survey about their demographic characteristics, sexual abuse experiences, disclosure characteristics, post-abuse coping, and social reactions from others. Results Female students reported greater prevalence and severity of CSA, more distress and self-blame immediately post-assault, and greater reliance on coping strategies of withdrawal and trying to forget than male students. Women were more likely to have disclosed their abuse to others, to have received positive reactions, and to report greater PTSD symptom severity, but were no more likely to receive negative reactions upon disclosure than men. Women delaying disclosure had greater PTSD symptom severity, whereas men's symptoms did not vary by timing of disclosure. Additional regression analyses examined predictors of PTSD symptom severity and negative and positive social reactions to abuse disclosures. Conclusions Several gender differences were observed in this sample of college students in terms of sexual abuse experiences, psychological symptoms, coping, PTSD, and some aspects of disclosure and social reactions from others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.01.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The more detailed, insightful, and extensive the disclosures are, the less posttraumatic symptoms they are likely to experience and the better their outcomes tend to be.

    “Further, the more detailed, insightful, and extensive the disclosures are, the less posttraumatic symptoms they are likely to experience and the better their outcomes tend to be, demonstrating the utility of trauma-related disclosure for facilitating trauma processing (Pennebaker et al., 1997;Pérez et al., 2017;Ullman & Filipas, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ullman, Sarah E.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
767-782
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022271174
Cited by
383
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
child sexual abuse, gender differences, disclosure of abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD symptom severity, self-blame, disclosure timing, university students, coping strategies, prevalence of child sexual abuse
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Adjustment, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Students, United States, Crime Victims, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review