Cited by 156Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

“A burden in your heart”: Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse

Staller, Karen M., Nelson-Gardell, Debra·2005·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objectives To enhance understanding of the sexual abuse disclosure process from the perspective of preteen and teenage survivors. To reconsider prominent models of the disclosure process in light of our findings. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data from four focus groups in which 34 preadolescent and adolescent female survivors of sexual abuse had been asked about their treatment experiences. Girls often recounted disclosing their victimization to others. Using the disclosure segment as our unit of analysis, we isolated 106 for study. During analysis, we wrote narrative summaries of each segment's significance, grouped these conceptually, and examined their interconnectedness. When synthesized, individual experiences of disclosing contributed to understanding the overall disclosure process. Results Three phases were identified: Self, where children come to understand victimization internally; Confidant Selection-Reaction, where they select a time, place, and person to tell and then weather that person's reaction (supportive or hostile); and Consequences (good and bad) that continued to inform their on-going strategies of telling. The actions and reactions of adults were significant and informed the girls' decisions. Conclusions We advocate integrating existing theories and research into a model which views the disclosure process from the child's perspective and includes pre-disclosure and a post-initial public disclosure stages. The model conceptualizes disclosure as an iterative process in which children interact with adults and incorporate responses into their on-going decisions about telling (recant, deny, affirm, etc.). The combined model should recognize the concerns and position of adults as well as the perspective and logic of youth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.06.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • How parents respond strongly shapes what follows a child's disclosure; children interpret and react to adults' reactions, so disclosure is interactive.

    “Parental reaction was found to be critical to the outcome when children disclosed, as Staller, and Nelson-Gardell (2005) noted that “disclosure is not a one-way process.Children receive, process, evaluate, and react to information based on how adults respond to them” (p.1423).”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as Staller, and Nelson-Gardell (2005)

  • Disclosure does not unfold in a straight line; it may emerge in fragments over a survivor's life, sometimes unintentionally and sometimes deliberately.

    “Staller, and Nelson-Gardell (2005) added that since disclosure it not a linear process it often comes out in incomplete slices throughout a victim's life; sometimes by accident, other times purposefully.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as Staller, and Nelson-Gardell (2005)

  • The literature identifies disclosure as a process involving multiple interacting influences rather than singular events that unfold linearly.

    “The literature has identified disclosure as a 'process' thus clearly reflecting the complexity of the situation experienced by the victims, involving multiple levels of interacting influences rather than singular events that evolve in a linear fashion”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as Staller, & Nelson-Gardell, 2005

  • Feeling safe, believed, and emotionally comforted are critical to a positive disclosure experience.

    “feeling safe was found to be critical when disclosing (Alaggia, 2004;Staller, & Nelson-Gardell, 2005), as well as being believed and comforted emotionally.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as Staller, & Nelson-Gardell, 2005

  • The findings of Ungar et al. (2009a) lend support to studies that have identified similarly interactive models of disclosure.

    “Findings lend support to studies that have identified similarly interactive models of disclosure such as those detailed by Alaggia (2004) and Staller and Nelson-Gardell (2005).”

    From Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Disclosures: A Research Update (2000–2016) (2019) · cites this paper as Staller and Nelson-Gardell (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staller, K. M., & Nelson-Gardell, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Staller, Karen M.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1415-1432
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987203870
Cited by
156
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure of victimization, adolescent survivors, preadolescent girls, children's perspectives
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Confidentiality, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review