Cited by 298Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

A preliminary mapping of individual, relational, and social factors that impede disclosure of childhood sexual abuse

Collin-Vézina, Delphine, De La Sablonnière-Griffin, Mireille, Palmer, Andrea M., Milne, Lise·2015·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Uncovering the pathways to disclosures of child sexual abuse (CSA) and the factors influencing the willingness of victims to talk about the abuse is paramount to the development of powerful practice and policy initiatives. Framed as a long interview method utilizing a grounded theory approach to analyze data, the objective of the current study was to provide a preliminary mapping of the barriers to CSA disclosures through an ecological systemic lens, from a sample of 67 male and female CSA adult survivors, all of whom had recently received counselling services. The current project led to the identification of three broad categories of barriers that were each comprised of several subthemes, namely: Barriers from Within (internalized victim-blaming, mechanisms to protect oneself, and immature development at time of abuse); Barriers in Relation to Others (violence and dysfunction in the family, power dynamics, awareness of the impact of telling, and fragile social network); and Barriers in Relation to the Social World (labelling, taboo of sexuality, lack of services available, and culture or time period). This study points to the importance of using a broad ecological framework to understand the factors that inhibit disclosure of CSA, as barriers to disclosure do not constrain solely the victims. Results are discussed in light of their implications for research, prevention and intervention programs, and social policies and media campaigns, as the burden is on the larger community to create a climate of safety and transparency that makes the telling of CSA possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.010

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collin-Vézina, D., De La Sablonnière-Griffin, M., Palmer, A. M., & Milne, L.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
43
Pages
123-134
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998494979
Cited by
298
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, barriers to disclosure, adult survivors, ecological systems theory, victim blaming, family dysfunction, power relations, social networks, stigma, counseling services, child abuse prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Truth Disclosure, Qualitative Research, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review