Cited by 125Child Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Evaluation of an intervention promoting emotion regulation skills for adults with persisting distress due to adverse childhood experiences

Cameron, Linda D., Carroll, Paul, Hamilton, W. Kyle·2018·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

This phase II trial evaluated psychosocial and health outcomes of an intervention designed to improve emotion regulation skills in adults suffering from Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). The study utilized a pretest-posttest design in which 92 adults enrolled in the community-based program completed pretest measures, attended either a faith-based or secular version of the 12-week ACE Overcomers program, and then completed posttest measures. The theory-guided program involved group sessions providing education and skills training to improve emotion regulation, self-awareness, resilience, and social functioning. Pretest and posttest surveys included measures of emotional regulation (suppression, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and mindfulness), resilience (ego resilience and general self-efficacy), emotional experiences (perceived stress, moods, and depressive symptoms), quality of life (the SF-36 domains), and physical symptoms and illness (symptom load and sick days). Analyses revealed significant improvements from pretest to posttest in all facets of emotion regulation (p < .01), psychological resilience (p < .001), mental well-being (p < .001) and physical symptoms and illness (p < .001), and in specific facets of quality of life (p < .001). The faith-based and secular versions of the program yielded comparable improvements in well-being. Improvements were comparable for older versus younger participants, except that younger participants reported greater improvements in perceived stress (p < .05). These preliminary findings support the application of an emotion regulation perspective to interventions for adults with high ACEs. The study, with its single-group design, represents a promising step in the translational research pathway and provides support for further studies utilizing comparison groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.002

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, L. D., Carroll, P., & Hamilton, W. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Linda D.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
79
Pages
423-433
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793474030
Cited by
125
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, emotion regulation, psychosocial interventions, faith-based interventions, resilience, self-efficacy, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, quality of life, somatic symptoms, group skills training, community-based programs
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adult, Child, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review