Cited by 50Child Abuse and TraumaSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesElder Abuse and Neglect

Influence of childhood abuse and neglect subtypes on late-life suicide risk beyond depression

Open access
Behr Gomes Jardim, Gabriel, Novelo, Marta, Spanemberg, Lucas, von Gunten, Armin, Engroff, Paula, Nogueira, Eduardo Lopes, Cataldo Neto, Alfredo·2018·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

The association of childhood maltreatment and suicide has been extensively examined within the population. Depression figures as a main cause for the elevated suicide rate in advanced ages and is often related to childhood maltreatment. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between childhood maltreatment subtypes and suicide risk, testing geriatric depression as a moderator. This is a cross-sectional study looking at a sample of 449 individuals 60 year s old or older from the Multidimensional Study of the Elderly of Porto Alegre Family Health Strategy, Brazil (EMI-SUS/POA). Childhood maltreatment (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), geriatric depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), and suicide risk (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) were assessed. The subtypes of childhood abuse and neglect were significantly associated with suicide risk. In the multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, income, marital status, ethnicity, smoking, and geriatric depression symptoms, all trauma subtypes remained associated with suicide risk with the exception of physical neglect (EA = 3.65; PA = 3.16; SA = 5.1; EN = 2.43; PN = 1.76). The present study showed that childhood maltreatment subtypes predicted suicide risk, and geriatric depression does not directly mediate this relation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.029

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behr Gomes Jardim, G., Novelo, M., Spanemberg, L., von Gunten, A., Engroff, P., Nogueira, E. L., & Cataldo Neto, A.
Affiliations
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
80
Pages
249-256
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795482121
Cited by
50
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PUCRS Repository (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
child abuse, suicide risk, physical abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, geriatric depression, older adults, late-life suicide, trauma subtypes
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Aged, Brazil, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review