Cited by 407Child Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Childhood adversity and adult depression: The protective role of psychological resilience

Poole, Julia C., Dobson, Keith S., Pusch, Dennis·2017·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), such as childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, have been identified as salient risk factors for adult depression. However, not all individuals who experience ACEs go on to develop depression. The extent to which resilience- or the ability to demonstrate stable levels of functioning despite adversity- may act as a buffer against depression among individuals with a history of ACEs has not been adequately examined. To address the associations between ACEs, depression, and resilience, 4006 adult participants were recruited from primary care clinics. Participants completed self-report questionnaires including: the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire, a retrospective measure of childhood adversity; the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a measure of the presence and severity of the major symptoms of depression; and the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale, a measure of psychological resilience. Results from regression analyses indicated that, while controlling for a range of demographic variables, both ACEs and resilience independently predicted symptoms of depression, F(9, 3040)=184.81, R 2 =0.354. Further, resilience moderated the association between ACEs and depression, F(10, 3039)=174.36, p 2 =0.365. Specifically, the association between ACEs and depression was stronger among individuals with low resilience relative to those with high resilience. This research provides important information regarding the relationships among A…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.12.012

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poole, J. C., Dobson, K. S., & Pusch, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
Corresponding author
Poole, Julia C.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
64
Pages
89-100
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568841469
Cited by
407
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4
FWCI
26.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Palix Foundation (1031803)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, childhood abuse, child neglect, household dysfunction, psychological resilience, adult depression, depressive symptoms, moderating effect, protective factors, primary care patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Family Conflict, Resilience, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review