Cited by 87Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceParental Involvement in EducationSchool Health and Nursing Education

A new program to prevent primary school absenteeism: results of a pilot study in five schools

Cook, Philip J., Dodge, Kenneth A., Gifford, Elizabeth J., Schulting, Amy B.·2017·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.017

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, P. J., Dodge, K. A., Gifford, E. J., & Schulting, A. B.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Gifford, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
82
Pages
262-270
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755145984
Cited by
87
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
FWCI
22.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Education (R305A120526)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
school absenteeism, truancy prevention, elementary school students, parent-teacher communication, teacher intervention, high-poverty schools, student attendance, school dropout prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review