Cited by 161Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceSchool Health and Nursing EducationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Adolescent school absenteeism: Modelling social and individual risk factors

Open access
Ingul, Jo Magne, Klöckner, Christian A., Silverman, Wendy K., Nordahl, Hans M.·2012·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: School absenteeism is a complex problem that includes risk factors associated with individual traits, socio‐economic conditions, family structure, the school and society. The consequences of extensive school absenteeism can be detrimental for the youth. Method: In this exploratory study we aimed to investigate the relative importance of different risk factors on school absenteeism. We assessed 865 Norwegian high school students testing a model of school absenteeism using Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM). Results: Analysis show that on the individual level most of the measured risk factors were significantly associated with absenteeism. School absenteeism was predicted by externalising behaviour, family work and health, and school environment directly. Conclusion: The implications of the findings on school absenteeism are that it will be important to focus more on the context and co‐occurrence of these problems in order to fully understand them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00615.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout are not present in isolation, but coexist and interact with other risk factors.

    “it has been acknowledged that risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout are not present in isolation, but coexist and interact with other risk factors (e.g., Berends and Diest 2014; Ingul et al. 2012; Kearney 2008a, 2008b).”

    From Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Ingul et al. 2012

    The Conclusions state that risk factors for school absenteeism act differently when considered together rather than alone, supporting the claim about coexisting factors. The paper links absenteeism to dropout in the Background, but does not establish the same interaction among risk factors for dropout. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Because depressed adolescents are more likely to be absent and were not included, the study may have understated any effect of social media on depressive symptoms.

    “We potentially underestimated effects of social media on depressive symptoms, as depression is linked to adolescent absenteeism and these students are not represented here [39].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bentler, P. (1989). Comparative fit indices. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  2. Ó 2011 The Authors. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Ó 2011 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 14753588, 2012, 2, Downloaded from https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00615.x by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [29/05/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  3. Kent, L., Vostanis, P., & Feehan, C. (1997). Detection of major and minor depression in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 565-573.
  4. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (2007). Mplus userÕs guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingul, J. M., Klöckner, C. A., Silverman, W. K., & Nordahl, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Ingul, Jo Magne
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-29
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
93-100
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W1600717173
Cited by
161
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Helse Midt-Norge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school absenteeism, adolescents, risk factors, externalizing problems, family responsibilities, family health, school environment, high school students, socioeconomic conditions, family structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review