Cited by 177School Choice and PerformanceYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceInnovations in Educational Methods

Flaking Out: Student Absences and Snow Days as Disruptions of Instructional Time

Open access
Goodman, Joshua·2014·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Despite the fact that the average American student is absent more than two weeks out of every school year, most research on the effect of instructional time has focused not on attendance but on the length of the school day or year.Student and school fixed effects models using Massachusetts data show a strong relationship between student absences and achievement but no impact of lost instructional time due to school closures.I confirm those findings in instrumental variables models exploiting the fact that moderate snowfall induces student absences while extreme snowfall induces school closures.Prior work ignoring this non-linearity may have mis-attributed the effect of absences to such snow days.Each absence induced by bad weather reduces math achievement by 0.05 standard deviations, suggesting that attendance can account for up to one-fourth of the achievement gap by income.That absences matter but closures do not is consistent with a model of instruction in which coordination of students is the central challenge, as in Lazear (2001).Teachers appear to deal well with coordinated disruptions of instructional time like snow days but deal poorly with disruptions like absences that affect different students at different times.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w20221

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marcotte and Hemelt (2008) and Goodman (2014) both find that individual absences related to snow days have a more negative impact on achievement in schools with higher poverty rates.

    “Similarly, Marcotte and Hemelt (2008) and Goodman (2014) both find that individual absences related to snow days have a more negative impact on achievement in schools with higher poverty rates”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Goodman (2014)

  • Goodman (2014) finds no impact of snow days resulting in school closures in Massachusetts, but documents effects of individual absences.

    “Goodman (2014) finds no impact of snow days resulting in school closures in Massachusetts, but does document effects of individual absences.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Goodman (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, J.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Joshua
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2014-06
OpenAlex
W1498380278
Cited by
177
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
Keywords
school absenteeism, snow days, school closures, instructional time, mathematics achievement, Massachusetts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review