Cited by 13Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCareer Development and Diversity

Developing a typology of mentoring programmes for young people attending secondary school in the United Kingdom using qualitative methods

Open access
Busse, Heide, Campbell, Rona, Kipping, Ruth·2018·Children and Youth Services Review

Abstract

Mentoring programmes are commonplace and delivered in a range of different ways in the United Kingdom and North America. To better understand the type of programmes available and to inform future evaluations, we developed a typology of formal mentoring programmes for young people in secondary schools in the United Kingdom. Telephone interviews with 23 programme managers from purposively sampled mentoring organisations were conducted and analysed using thematic and framework analysis. The typology was consulted on with five experts in mentoring. The final typology differentiates mentoring programmes by three overarching categories: type of mentor (older student, school staff, adult volunteer, paid adult), programme setting (school, community, online) and programme aim. The findings suggest that although mentoring programmes are heterogeneous, it is possible to group programmes into 'personal and developmental' and 'academic and employability' mentoring programmes and to differentiate between 12 overall mentoring models. The typology helps understand what is being delivered and how, which is a necessary precursor to any evaluation of health, educational, relational and social outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.025

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three key active ingredients have been recognized in mentoring relationships: emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing.

    “Three key active ingredients have been recognized: emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing [82,83,84].”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes an emotional bond and guidance for growth as elements of mentoring. The Results, under Typology development (page unavailable), describe recreational activities in some programmes. The paper does not identify emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing as three key active ingredients of mentoring relationships. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pryce J.M. Keller T.E. Typology of school-based mentoring relationships: a multi-dimensional analysis Paper presented at the eleventh annual conference of the society for social work and research, San Francisco, US 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busse, H., Campbell, R., & Kipping, R.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Busse, Heide
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
88
Pages
401-415
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792112500
Cited by
13
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement
  • UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  • British Heart Foundation (MR/KO232331/1)
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Medical Research Council
  • Welsh Government
  • Wellcome Trust
  • UK Clinical Research Collaboration
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
mentoring programs, high school students, youth mentoring, mentoring model, program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review