Cited by 472Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDialysis and Renal Disease Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Readmission and mortality in malnourished, older, hospitalized adults treated with a specialized oral nutritional supplement: A randomized clinical trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized, malnourished older adults have a high risk of readmission and mortality. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of a high-protein oral nutritional supplement (HP-HMB) containing beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on postdischarge outcomes of nonelective readmission and mortality in malnourished, hospitalized older adults. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Inpatient and posthospital discharge. PATIENTS: Older (≥65 years), malnourished (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA] class B or C) adults hospitalized for congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. INTERVENTIONS: Standard-of-care plus HP-HMB (n = 328) or a placebo supplement (n = 324), 2 servings/day. MEASUREMENTS: Primary composite endpoint was 90-day postdischarge incidence of death or nonelective readmission. Other endpoints included 30- and 60-day postdischarge incidence of death or readmission, length of stay (LOS), SGA class, body weight, and activities of daily living (ADL). RESULTS: The primary composite endpoint was similar between HP-HMB (26.8%) and placebo (31.1%). No between-group differences were observed for 90-day readmission rate, but 90-day mortality was significantly lower with HP-HMB relative to placebo (4.8% vs. 9.7%; relative risk 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.90; p = 0.018). The number-needed-to-treat to prevent 1 death was 20.3 (95% CI: 10.9, 121.4). Compared with placebo, HP-HMB resulted in improved odds of better nutritional status (SGA class, OR, 2.04, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.25, p = 0.009) at day 90, and an increase in body weight at day 30 (p = 0.035). LOS and ADL were similar between treatments. LIMITATIONS: Limited generalizability; patients represent a selected hospitalized population. CONCLUSIONS: Although no effects were observed for the primary composite endpoint, compared with placebo HP-HMB decreased mortality and improved indices of nutritional status during the 90-day observation period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01626742.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.010

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Deutz, N. E., Matheson, E. M., Matarese, L. E., Luo, M., Baggs, G. E., Nelson, J. L., Hegazi, R. A., Tappenden, K. A., & Ziegler, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • Abbott Nutrition (United States) (US)
  • Mansoura University (EG)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Deutz, Nicolaas E.
  • Matheson, Eric M.
  • Matarese, Laura E.
  • Luo, Menghua
  • Baggs, Geraldine E.
  • Nelson, Jeffrey L.
  • Hegazi, Refaat A.
  • Tappenden, Kelly A.
  • Ziegler, Thomas R.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2257285672
Cited by
472
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23
FWCI
35.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Scholarship East Carolina University's Institutional Repository (East Carolina University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
oral nutritional supplements, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, malnutrition, older adults, hospital readmission, post-discharge mortality, nutritional status, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, length of hospital stay, activities of daily living, body weight, post-discharge care, number needed to treat
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Acute Disease, Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Dietary Proteins, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Nutritional Status, Patient Readmission, Pneumonia, Valerates, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Endpoint Determination, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review