Cited by 20Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareNeural Networks and Applications

A happiness degree predictor using the conceptual data structure for deep learning architectures

Open access
Pérez-Benito, Francisco Javier, Villacampa-Fernández, Patricia, Conejero, J. Alberto, García-Gómez, Juan M., Navarro-Pardo, Esperanza·2019·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective Happiness is a universal fundamental human goal. Since the emergence of Positive Psychology, a major focus in psychological research has been to study the role of certain factors in the prediction of happiness. The conventional methodologies are based on linear relationships, such as the commonly used Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), which may suffer from the lack of representative capacity to the varied psychological features. Using Deep Neural Networks (DNN), we define a Happiness Degree Predictor (H-DP) based on the answers to five psychometric standardized questionnaires.Methods A Data-Structure driven architecture for DNNs (D-SDNN) is proposed for defining a HDP in which the network architecture enables the conceptual interpretation of psychological factors associated to happiness. Four different neural network configurations have been tested, varying the number of neurons and the presence or absence of bias in the hidden layers. Two metrics for evaluating the influence of conceptual dimensions have been defined and computed: one quantifies the influence weight of the conceptual dimension in absolute terms and the other one pinpoints the direction (positive or negative) of the influence.Materials A cross-sectional survey targeting non-institutionalized adult population residing in Spain was completed by 823 cases. The total of 111 elements of the survey are grouped by socio-demographic data and by five psychometric scales (Brief COPE Inventory, EPQR-A, GHQ-28, MOS-SSS and SDHS) measuring several psychological factors acting one as the outcome (SDHS) and the four others as predictors.Results Our D-SDNN approach provided a better outcome (MSE: 1.46·10-2) than MLR (MSE: 2.30·10-2), hence improving by 37% the predictive accuracy, and allowing to simulate the conceptual structure.Conclusions We observe a better performance of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) with respect to traditional methodologies. This demonstrates its capability to capture the conceptual structure for predicting happiness degree through psychological variables assessed by standardized questionnaires. It also permits to estimate the influence of each factor on the outcome without assuming a linear relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.11.004

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. United Nations Foundation, Pharrel Williams tells the world: A Happy Planet = Happy People (2015). URL http://www.unfoundation.org/news-and-media/press-releases/2015/
  2. S. Joseph, C. A. Lewis, The depression-happiness scale: Reliability and validity of a bipolar self-report scale, Journal of Clinical Psychology 54 (4) (1998) 537-544.
  3. J. M. Bland, D. G. Altman, Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha, British Medical Journal 314 (7080) (1997) 572.
  4. V. Bonilla, Confiabilidad, en el boletín informativo INEVA en acción, Vol. 2.
  5. I. H. Bernstein, J. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  6. S. Garavaglia, A. Sharma, A smart guide to dummy variables: Four appli- cations and a macro, in: Proceedings of the Northeast SAS Users Group Conference, 1998, p. 43.
  7. R. M. Warner, D. Rasco, Structural equation models for prediction of sub- jective well-being: Modeling negative affect as a separate outcome, The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being 2 (1) (2014) 34-50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez-Benito, F. J., Villacampa-Fernández, P., Conejero, J. A., García-Gómez, J. M., & Navarro-Pardo, E.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
168
Pages
59-68
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768732579
Cited by
20
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
happiness prediction, subjective well-being, positive psychology, deep neural network, psychometric questionnaire, psychological factors, Brief COPE, GHQ-28, nonlinear relationship
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adaptation, Psychological, Algorithms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Models, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Software, Stress, Psychological, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review