The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of control functions in mentalizing: Dual-task studies of Theory of Mind and executive function
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555 · cited 2×
“In contrast, the Mind in the Eyes Test ( Baron-Cohen, Wheelright, Hill, Raste, & Plumb, 2001 ) requires recognition of emotional states from pictures of eyes, and does not require coordination of multiple perspectives or the integration of mental states with behaviours.”
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2412 · Cited by 3,670
Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x · Cited by 1,766
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity
Leslie, A. M. (1994) · Mapping the Mind · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511752902.006 · Cited by 1,105
The frontal lobes are necessary for `theory of mind'
Stuss, D. T. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.2.279 · Cited by 660
Rowe, A. D., Bullock, P. R., Polkey, C. E., & Morris, R. G. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.600 · Cited by 400
Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: Implications for autism
Sabbagh, M. A. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.002 · Cited by 337
Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Chiavarino, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929042947928 · Cited by 321
Cited by
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0016923 · Cited by 1,261
Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.
Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0018729 · Cited by 733
How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind
BUTTERFILL, S. A., & APPERLY, I. A. (2013) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12036 · Cited by 623
Emotion regulation in parenthood
Rutherford, H. J. V., Wallace, N. S., Laurent, H. K., & Mayes, L. C. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.008 · Cited by 485
Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: A TMS study
Kalbe, E., Schlegel, M., Sack, A. T., Nowak, D. A., Dafotakis, M., Bangard, C., Brand, M., Shamay-Tsoory, S., Onur, O. A., & Kessler, J. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Bull, R., Phillips, L. H., & Conway, C. A.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 663-672
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984278361
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of control functions in mentalizing: Dual-task studies of Theory of Mind and executive function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.015
- The paper
- Bull, R., Phillips, L. H., & Conway, C. A. (2008). The role of control functions in mentalizing: Dual-task studies of Theory of Mind and executive function. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
