The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose
Abstract
Cognitive theories of religion have postulated several cognitive biases that predispose human minds towards religious belief. However, to date, these hypotheses have not been tested simultaneously and in relation to each other, using an individual difference approach. We used a path model to assess the extent to which several interacting cognitive tendencies, namely mentalizing, mind body dualism, teleological thinking, and anthropomorphism, as well as cultural exposure to religion, predict belief in God, paranormal beliefs and belief in life's purpose. Our model, based on two independent samples (N=492 and N=920) found that the previously known relationship between mentalizing and belief is mediated by individual differences in dualism, and to a lesser extent by teleological thinking. Anthropomorphism was unrelated to religious belief, but was related to paranormal belief. Cultural exposure to religion (mostly Christianity) was negatively related to anthropomorphism, and was unrelated to any of the other cognitive tendencies. These patterns were robust for both men and women, and across at least two ethnic identifications. The data were most consistent with a path model suggesting that mentalizing comes first, which leads to dualism and teleology, which in turn lead to religious, paranormal, and life's-purpose beliefs. Alternative theoretical models were tested but did not find empirical support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rather, rates of belief in paranormal and otherwise supramundane but non-religious phenomena such as ghosts, UFOs and other mythical creatures remain as high as ever (Baker and Draper 2010; Persinger 2001; Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”
From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as Willard and Norenzayan 2013
Citations
Cites
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
DESCARTES' ERROR: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Marg, E. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03988.x · Cited by 8,178
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134475 · Cited by 2,342 · cited 1×
“He is a mega-mind without the frailty of a human body and without basic human needs, like hunger, or feelings (Gray et al., 2007).”
Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994.
Damasio, A. R. (1994) · Cited by 2,266
Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2732a · Cited by 1,935
Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. (2000) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00078 · Cited by 1,847
Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5845 · Cited by 1,778
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
Self-citationMcKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038455 · Cited by 353
“Recent evidence that acceptance of teleological explanations is related to belief in God, as well as to belief in Nature as a powerful “being” (Kelemen et al., 2013; see also Willard & Norenzayan, 2013), is consistent with this suggestion.”
BackgroundResultYou’re so lovable: Anthropomorphism and brand love
Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ahuvia, A. (2014) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2014.14 · Cited by 259
Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153039 · Cited by 232
“10, [43]), teleological thinking (r = .”
Kim, J., & Im, I. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107512 · Cited by 233
Texting with Humanlike Conversational Agents: Designing for Anthropomorphism
Seeger, A.-M., University of Mannheim, G., Pfeiffer, J., Justus Liebig University Giessen, G., Heinzl, A., & University of Mannheim, G. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00685 · Cited by 200
“…studies have repeatedly shown that this determinant is an important predictor of perceived anthropomorphism (Caruso, Waytz, & Epley, 2010; Tam, 2014; Waytz et al., 2014; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013), IS studies on anthropomorphism so far have disregarded dispositional anthropomorphism’s role.”
BackgroundLanman, J., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1117011 · Cited by 167
“Willard and Norenzayan (2013), for instance, found no relationship between the percentage of religious adherents in an individual’s community and their levels of paranormal belief.”
Background(2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198843702.001.0001 · Cited by 138
Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005 · Cited by 133
Sensing the presence of gods and spirits across cultures and faiths
Luhrmann, T. M., Weisman, K., Aulino, F., Brahinsky, J., Dulin, J. C., Dzokoto, V. A. A., Legare, C. H., Lifshitz, M., Ng, E., Ross-Zehnder, N., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016649118 · Cited by 145
“Instead, porosity and absorption may be part of the scaffolding on which religions build (41) — e.g., by offering causal models of how God ’ s voice can be heard in the mind and of how demons feed on jealous feelings, or by inviting people to immerse themselves in their inner lives through prayer…”
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017 · Cited by 129
Lindeman, M., Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. O. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008 · Cited by 135
“Recently, however, several scholars have brought up that these beliefs are also a type of supernatural belief (Bering, 2006, 2011; Svedholm, Lindeman, & Lipsanen, 2010; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundResultTesting theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia
Willard, A. K., & Cingl, L. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002 · Cited by 132
“…God was measured with a three-question scale (I believe in God; I believe in a divine being who is involved in my life; There is no god or higher power in the universe; α = 0.71; see Willard & Norenzayan, 2013). larization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, Evohav.2017.01.002”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMaij, D. L. R., van Harreveld, F., Gervais, W., Schrag, Y., Mohr, C., & van Elk, M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182764 · Cited by 110
“However, since previous samples also consisted of highly educated students [16,17] this characteristic of our sample seems unlikely to explain any of the differences between our and previous studies.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialOverride the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution
Gervais, W. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011 · Cited by 115
“Many supernatural beliefs come easily to people, perhaps because they are supported by a variety of core intuitive processes (e.g., Atran & Norenzayan, 2004; Bloom, 2007; Gervais, 2013; McCauley, 2011; Norenzayan & Gervais, 2013; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
MCI theory: a critical discussion
Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2015) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1024915 · Cited by 113
“Incidentally, it is this deep intuitiveness that researchers also use to explain why religious ideas are ubiquitous (e.g., Barrett, 2004; Bering, 2011; Bloom, 2007; Gervais & Norenzayan, 2012; Guthrie, 1993; Kelemen, 2004; Shenhav, Rand, & Greene, 2012; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSeverson, R. L., & Lemm, K. M. (2015) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2014.989445 · Cited by 110
“Spiritual but not religious”: Cognition, schizotypy, and conversion in alternative beliefs
Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.018 · Cited by 95
“These biases are rooted in, or extensions of, Theory of Mind (ToM) (see Lindeman, SvedholmHäkkinen, & Lipsanen, 2015; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMemory and Belief in the Transmission of Counterintuitive Content
Willard, A. K., Henrich, J., & Norenzayan, A. (2016) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-016-9259-6 · Cited by 98
Self-citationAbeyta, A. A., & Routledge, C. D. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.038 · Cited by 102
Seeking the supernatural: the Interactive Religious Experience Model
Leeuwen, N. V., & van Elk, M. (2018) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2018.1453529 · Cited by 99
“…findings appear in the literature about the relation between agency detection and supernatural beliefs, with some studies showing a positive relation (e.g., Norenzayan et al., 2012; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013) and other studies showing the absence of a relation (Maij, van Harreveld, et al., 2017).”
The Content and Correlates of Belief in Karma Across Cultures
White, C., Norenzayan, A., & Schaller, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218808502 · Cited by 103
“For example, belief in Karma may be predicted by the same individual differences that have been found (in some samples) to predict belief in God (e.g., mentalizing, dualism, and intuitive thinking, Pennycook et al., 2016; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundBelief changes associated with psychedelic use
Nayak, S. M., Singh, M., Yaden, D. B., & Griffiths, R. R. (2022) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811221131989 · Cited by 96
“Dualism is associated with belief in God, karma, Paranormal beliefs, and afterlife beliefs (Riekki et al., 2013; White et al., 2021; Willard and Norenzayan, 2013; Willard et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPriming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection
van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2014) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2014.933444 · Cited by 89
“As discussed above, previous studies have shown that individual differences in religious and paranormal beliefs are associated with differential agency-detection biases (Barnes & Gibson, 2013; Petrican & Burris, 2012; Riekki et al., 2013; van Elk, 2013; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
InfluentialNo empathy for people nor for God: The relationship between the Dark Triad, religiosity and empathy
Łowicki, P., & Zajenkowski, M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.012 · Cited by 82
“It presents a high level of overall internal consistency, and has proven good construct validity (Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIndividual difference factors related to anthropomorphic tendency
Letheren, K., Kuhn, K.-A., Lings, I. N., & Pope, N. K. (2016) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-05-2014-0291 · Cited by 80
Coordinating bodies and minds: Behavioral synchrony fosters mentalizing
Baimel, A., Birch, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.008 · Cited by 75
“…for individual differences in mentalizing (eg., see Baron-Cohen (2009) for discussion of sex differences; see Bernstein, Thornton, & Sommerville (2011) for discussion of age-related differences; and see Willard & Norenzayan, 2013 for a discussion of cultural differences in a comparable sample).”
BackgroundAre People Born to be Believers, or are Gods Born to be Believed?
Shook, J. R. (2017) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341389 · Cited by 74
Diverse Cognitive Profiles of Religious Believers and Nonbelievers
Lindeman, M., & Lipsanen, J. O. (2016) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2015.1091695 · Cited by 78
“…for religiosity is the ability to understand other people’s minds, or mentalizing (Banerjee & Bloom, 2014; Barrett, 2000; Boyer, 2003; Gervais, 2013; Kelemen, 2004; Pyysiäinen & Hauser, 2010; Schaap-Jonker, Sizoo, van Schothorst-van Roekel, & Corveleyn, 2013; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundResultQuinn, S., Hogan, M., Dwyer, C. P., Finn, P., & Fogarty, E. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100710 · Cited by 99
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of the Psychology of Religion
Alkhouri, K. I. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15030290 · Cited by 115
“Examining Cognitive Biases and Religious Beliefs (Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialIs God just a big person? Children's conceptions of God across cultures and religious traditions
Nyhof, M., & Johnson, C. N. (2017) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12173 · Cited by 61
“Additionally, research should examine whether cognitive biases are related to religious beliefs in children, as Willard and Norenzayan (2013) have found with adults.”
BackgroundCultural influences on the teleological stance: evidence from China
Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. A. (2016) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1118402 · Cited by 66
“…utilized in the present study (Banerjee & Bloom, 2014; Davis, Juhl, & Routledge, 2011; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Kelemen et al., 2013; Mills & Frowley, 2015; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013), Western participants who were otherwise demographically similar to the present sample (e.g., university Figure 1.”
BackgroundMethodNorenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000655 · Cited by 58
Self-citationHearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Norenzayan, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426 · Cited by 62
White, C. J. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.03.001 · Cited by 54
Biological and cognitive underpinnings of religious fundamentalism
Zhong, W., Cristofori, I., Bulbulia, J. A., Krüeger, F., & Grafman, J. H. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.009 · Cited by 57
“Recently, a number of studies have found an inverse relationship between analytic thinking and religious disbelief (Gervais and Norenzayan, 2012; Norenzayan et al., 2012; Willard and Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundNon-Reflective Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences
Bouvet, R., & Bonnefon, J. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215585728 · Cited by 53
“Considering the protean contents of supernatural beliefs, it would be tempting to assume that they derive from a multifaceted set of cognitive processes (Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundBelieving in other minds: Accurate mentalizing does not predict religiosity
Vonk, J. M., & Pitzen, J. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.008 · Cited by 50
“Empathy measures are sometimes conflated with measures of mentalizing (e.g. Willard & Norenzayan, 2013) but they typically assess only an individual's self-report of the tendency to engage in thinking about another's feelings and, unlike ToMmeasures, do not assess accuracy in reading other kinds of…”
BackgroundMethodScience demands explanation, religion tolerates mystery
Liquin, E. G., Metz, S. E., & Lombrozo, T. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104398 · Cited by 50
“In particular, both scientific and religious beliefs are shaped by intuitive theories and by common cognitive biases, including tendencies to essentialize and to interpret behavior as purposeful (e.g., Shtulman, 2015; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Origins of Religious Disbelief: A Dual Inheritance Approach
Gervais, W. M., Najle, M. B., & Caluori, N. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550621994001 · Cited by 52
Religiosity and Psychotic Ideation in Stable Schizophrenia: A Role for Empathic Perspective-Taking
Duñó, R., Oliva, J. C., Tobeña, A., Palao, D. J., & Labad, J. (2020) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs10020053 · Cited by 49
“Finally, in patients on the autistic spectrum, they found that their mentalizing deficits were associated with reduced belief in God [17,32].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReligious Belief, Religious Priming, and Negative Word of Mouth
Casidy, R., Duhachek, A., Singh, V., & Tamaddoni, A. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437211011196 · Cited by 49
“Religious belief and religious priming are orthogonal constructs: religious belief reflects one’s internal belief about God, whereas religious priming momentarily activates religious thoughts in an individual’s mind that reveal nothing about their belief (Shariff et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAttributes of God: Conceptual Foundations of a Foundational Belief
Shtulman, A., & Lindeman, M. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12253 · Cited by 53
“Everything Happens for a Reason”: Children's Beliefs About Purpose in Life Events
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12312 · Cited by 52
“We suspect, then, that more sensitive measures would reveal some relation between teleological thought and religious belief among adults (see also Willard & Norenzayan, 2013), and potentially also among children.”
InfluentialLindeman, M., van Elk, M., Lipsanen, J. O., Marin, P., & Schjoedt, U. (2019) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2019.1591140 · Cited by 50
“…that religious beliefs are related to cognitive biases such as dualism, overmentalizing, and other ontological confusions (Banerjee & Bloom, 2014; Demertzi et al., 2009; Lindeman, Svedholm-Häkkinen, & Lipsanen, 2015; Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler, & Fugelsang, 2015; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundDo elderly religious people in South Korea have lower mean IQ than elderly non-religious people?
Nijenhuis, J. T., Dutton, E., Choi, K. Y., Choi, Y. Y., Lee, J. J., Seo, E. H., Kim, H., & Lee, K. H. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110298 · Cited by 42
McPhetres, J., Conway, P. J., Hughes, J. S., & Zuckerman, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.013 · Cited by 43
Cognitive Pathways to Belief in Karma and Belief in God
White, C., Willard, A. K., Baimel, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12935 · Cited by 47
Self-citationAnthropomorphism, social understanding, and imaginary companions
Tahiroğlu, D., & Taylor, M. (2018) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12272 · Cited by 46
How cultural learning and cognitive biases shape religious beliefs
White, C., Baimel, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.033 · Cited by 50
Rethinking Autism, Theism, and Atheism
Visuri, I. (2018) · Archive for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1163/15736121-12341348 · Cited by 41
Divine Emotions: On the Link Between Emotional Intelligence and Religious Belief
Łowicki, P., & Zajenkowski, M. (2016) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-016-0335-3 · Cited by 39
“With reference to the studies on mind-perception (Gervais 2013; Willard and Norenzayan 2013), this can be interpreted to mean that emotionally intelligent individuals may also present a high level of mentalizing ability, and that, as a result, they are capable of genuinely involving themselves in…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEmpathy and Exposure to Credible Religious Acts during Childhood Independently Predict Religiosity
Łowicki, P., & Zajenkowski, M. (2019) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2019.1672486 · Cited by 41
“Similarly, it is presumed that biases of overattribution of agency or purpose, which both serve their own evolutionary function, also facilitate the emergence of religious beliefs (Bloom, 2007; Kelemen, 2004; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Motivational Underpinnings of Belief in God
Laurin, K., & Kay, A. C. (2017) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.004 · Cited by 38
The impact of judgment and framing on entrepreneurs’ decision-making
Emami, A., Welsh, D. H. B., Ramadani, V., & Davari, A. (2019) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2018.1551461 · Cited by 39
“Limitations and future research directions Research has shown that context and culture affect mental models (Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”
BackgroundDean, C. E., Akhtar, S., Gale, T. M., Irvine, K., Grohmann, D., & Laws, K. R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267360 · Cited by 56
“Further work shows that paranormal beliefs positively correlated with biases towards: anthropomorphism, dualism, teleology, and mentalising, but were not predicted by mentalising [15].”
BackgroundThe Minds of God(s) and Humans: Differences in Mind Perception in Fiji and North America
Willard, A. K., & McNamara, R. A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12703 · Cited by 39
“…state reasoning to a wide variety of non-human, non-mentalistic, and even inanimate phenomena to create an assortment of religious and other supernatural beliefs (Guthrie, 1993; Heiphetz, Lane, Waytz, & Young, 2015; Waytz, Epley, & Cacioppo, 2010; Waytz et al., 2010; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSupernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: An fMRI study
Riekki, T. J. J., Lindeman, M., & Raij, T. T. (2014) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.906366 · Cited by 34
“…such as beliefs, desires, and intentions even to stars, energy, and other physical and biological phenomena (Lindeman & Aarnio, 2007; Lindeman & Saher, 2007; Norenzayan, Hansen, & Cady, 2008; Riekki, Lindeman, & Lipsanen, 2013; Svedholm, Lindeman, & Lipsanen, 2010; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
ResultImagining Others’ Minds: The Positive Relation Between Children’s Role Play and Anthropomorphism
Severson, R. L., & Woodard, S. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02140 · Cited by 29
“First, anthropomorphism of animals, technology, and inanimate nature is independent from the anthropomorphism of supernatural (or spiritual) entities (Waytz et al., 2010a, Study 1; Willard and Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundDimensional Structure of and Variation in Anthropomorphic Concepts of God
Shaman, N. J., Saide, A. R., & Richert, R. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01425 · Cited by 32
Willard, A. K., Cingl, L., & Norenzayan, A. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619841629 · Cited by 31
“Of particular relevance to this article, Willard and Norenzayan (2013; henceforth W&N) ran path models connecting mentalizing tendencies to religious, paranormal, and life’s purpose beliefs through these three cognitive biases—mind–body dualism, teleology, and anthropomorphism.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAre hotel guests bothered by unlucky floor or room assignments?
Pratt, S., & Kirillova, K. A. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.03.024 · Cited by 31
Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking
Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02529-7 · Cited by 39
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., & Browne, M. (2020) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09927-z · Cited by 33
Yılmaz, O. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.014 · Cited by 33
Genschow, O. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221137209 · Cited by 27
“Other research found a positive association between belief in dualism and teleological reasoning, belief in god, belief in the paranormal, and self-reported purpose in life (Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Interplay Between Cognitive Intelligence, Ability Emotional Intelligence, and Religiosity
Łowicki, P., Zajenkowski, M., & van der Linden, D. (2019) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-019-00953-0 · Cited by 31
“In Study 2, we added the measure of a general belief in God or higher power developed by Willard and Norenzayan (2013).”
BackgroundTowards a Haudenosaunee developmental science: Perspectives from the Two Row Wampum
Fish, J. (2021) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2279 · Cited by 25
Al-Billeh, T. N. (2022) · Balkan Social Science Review · doi:10.46763/bssr2220117ab · Cited by 26
Development of the Paranormal and Supernatural Beliefs Scale using classical and modern test theory
Dean, C. E., Akhtar, S., Gale, T. M., Irvine, K., Wiseman, R. J., & Laws, K. R. (2021) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-021-00600-y · Cited by 26
Mind-Body Dualism and Health Revisited
Burgmer, P., & Forstmann, M. (2018) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000344 · Cited by 26
“Further, belief in supernatural beings seem rooted in dualism, as believers typically construe them as agents lacking a body (Bloom, 2007, 2012; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundForstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.003 · Cited by 25
Heiphetz, L., Spelke, E. S., & Young, L. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.017 · Cited by 26
“They can also be associated with religious belief, although the relationship may be relatively weak (Evans, 2001; Kelemen, 2004; Kelemen & DiYanni, 2005; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
McPhetres, J., & Nguyen, T.-V. T. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2017.1326399 · Cited by 27
“…have argued that religious belief is a by-product, or side effect, of intuitive cognitive mechanisms predisposing humans to view and understand the world in ways conducive to belief in supernatural agents (Barrett, 2004; Baumard & Boyer, 2013; Bloom, 2007; Boyer, 2008; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundWlodarski, R., & Pearce, E. (2016) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9 · Cited by 22
Religion, Evolution, and the Basis of Institutions: The Institutional Cognition Model of Religion
Wood, C. P., & Shaver, J. H. (2018) · Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture · doi:10.26613/esic.2.2.89 · Cited by 22
We are not alone: The meaning motive, religiosity, and belief in extraterrestrial intelligence
Routledge, C. D., Abeyta, A. A., & Roylance, C. (2017) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9605-y · Cited by 23
“A number of scholars have argued that humans are naturally religious as a result of cognitive capacities that facilitate mentalizing the internal states and intentions of others (Atran 2002; Barrett 2000; Bloom 2007; Boyer 2001; Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”
BackgroundWhat are the causes and consequences of belief in karma?
White, C., Baimel, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2016.1249921 · Cited by 24
“Belief in karma, gods, and immanent justice may all be manifestations of a general motive for justice or fairness (Banerjee & Bloom, 2014; Baumard & Boyer, 2013), or a tendency to ascribe purpose to life events and natural phenomena (i.e., teleological thinking; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundYou get what you give: children's karmic bargaining
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2016) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12442 · Cited by 20
“…people reason about the non-social world, including how we think about events that unfold in our lives (Banerjee & Bloom, 2013, 2014, 2015; Bering, 2006, 2011; Heywood & Bering, 2014; Lindeman, Svedholm-H€akkinen & Lipsanen, 2015; Svedholm, Lindeman & Lipsanen, 2010; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
Antecedents, Manifestations, and Consequences of Belief in Mind–Body Dualism
Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_8 · Cited by 19
Is Chinese Culture Dualist? An Answer to Edward Slingerland from a Medical Philosophical Viewpoint
Pan, D. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfx028 · Cited by 19
Łowicki, P., Zajenkowski, M., & Cappellen, P. V. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109976 · Cited by 19
“Some researchers argue that it captures “mentalizing tendencies” (Willard & Norenzayan, 2013), while others suggest that it is “sensitive to people's accuracy in deciphering others' mental states” (Banerjee & Bloom, 2014, p. 288).”
Pro- and Assortative-sociality in the Formation and Maintenance of Religious Groups
Martin, L. H., & Wiebe, D. V. (2015) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.v2i1.5 · Cited by 18
“…between mind, religious beliefs, and ritual without any obvious concern for or hint of romanticizing religion's social dimensions (e.g. Hornbeck and Barrett 2013; Kapogiannis et al. 2009; Legare and Souza 2012 Rossano 2009; Schjoedt et al. 2013; Wigger et al. 2013; Willard and Norenzayan 2013).”
BackgroundTime to believe: Disentangling the complex associations between time perspective and religiosity
Łowicki, P., Witowska, J., Zajenkowski, M., & Stolarski, M. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.001 · Cited by 18
The Association Between Belief in God and Fertility Desires in Slovenia and the Czech Republic
Cranney, S. (2015) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/47e2915 · Cited by 17
Greenway, T. S., Jin, J., Shepherd, A. M., & Schnitker, S. A. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764219850867 · Cited by 17
“The RME was used to assess participants’ ability to recognize emotions, which has been linked to empathizing and belief in God (Norenzayan, Gervais, & Trzesniewski, 2012; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
MethodReligion as an Exchange System: The Interchangeability of God and Government in a Provider Role
Zuckerman, M., Li, C., & Diener, E. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218764656 · Cited by 25
“Mentalizing is sometimes viewed as incorporating all other tendencies (Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundPandemia COVID-19. Perspektywa psychologiczna
(2022) · Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks · doi:10.47943/lib.9788363487607 · Cited by 15
Predicting the Happiness of Adolescents Based on Coping Styles and Religious Attitudes
Fariddanesh, M., & Rezaei, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-017-0497-7 · Cited by 18
Wilt, J. A., Stauner, N., & Exline, J. J. (2022) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2022.2061151 · Cited by 16
“Singleheaded arrows represent regressions, and double-headed arrows represent covariances. particular (Gervais & Najle, 2015; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
BackgroundMoralization of Religiosity Explains Worldwide Trends in Religious BeliefPreprint
Abrams, S., Jackson, J. C., Vonasch, A. J., & Gray, K. J. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5a2db · Cited by 17
Coelho, C. M., Zsido, A. N., Suttiwan, P., & Clasen, M. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.036 · Cited by 16
Galen, L. W. (2017) · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion · doi:10.1163/15700682-12341393 · Cited by 15
Zawadzki, B., Popiel, A., Bielecki, M., Mroziński, B., & Pragłowska, E. (2022) · Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks · doi:10.47943/lib.9788363487607.rozdzial03 · Cited by 13
Nowe wyzwania dla neuropsychologii klinicznej: studia przypadku osób zakażonych wirusem SARS-CoV-2
Malinowska, E., Żarnecka, D., Wyszomirska, J., Hyniewska, S., Filon, M., & Łojek, E. (2022) · Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks · doi:10.47943/lib.9788363487607.rozdzial07 · Cited by 13
Rodziny z dziećmi i nastolatkami w czasach pandemii COVID- 19. Złożony obraz relacji
Gambin, M., Kmita, G., Woźniak‐Prus, M., Boruszak‐Kiziukiewicz, J., & Kubicka, K. (2022) · Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks · doi:10.47943/lib.9788363487607.rozdzial10 · Cited by 13
Sprawczość i wspólnotowość a lęk i samopoczucie w trakcie pandemii COVID-19
Wojtkowiak, N., & Hansen, K. (2022) · Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks · doi:10.47943/lib.9788363487607.rozdzial05 · Cited by 13
Reasons Things Happen for a Reason: An Integrative Theory of Teleology
Scott, M. J. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621995753 · Cited by 15
“This suggests that uncontrollability begets the intentional stance because it suggests agency (Kelemen et al., 2013; Kelemen & Rosset, 2009; Liquin & Lombrozo, 2018; Willard & Norenzayan, 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Willard, Aiyana K.
- ORCID
- Willard, Aiyana K.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-391
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149140482
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- cognitive biases, religious beliefs, supernatural beliefs, mentalization, mind-body dualism, teleological thinking, anthropomorphism, Christianity, individual differences, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Parapsychology, Religion and Psychology, United States, Young Adult, Theory of Mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review