The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iconicity affects children’s comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences
Open accessAbstract
Complex sentences involving adverbial clauses appear in children's speech at about three years of age yet children have difficulty comprehending these sentences well into the school years. To date, the reasons for these difficulties are unclear, largely because previous studies have tended to focus on only sub-types of adverbial clauses, or have tested only limited theoretical models. In this paper, we provide the most comprehensive experimental study to date. We tested four-year-olds, five-year-olds and adults on four different adverbial clauses (before, after, because, if) to evaluate four different theoretical models (semantic, syntactic, frequency-based and capacity-constrained). 71 children and 10 adults (as controls) completed a forced-choice, picture-selection comprehension test, providing accuracy and response time data. Children also completed a battery of tests to assess their linguistic and general cognitive abilities. We found that children's comprehension was strongly influenced by semantic factors - the iconicity of the event-to-language mappings - and that their response times were influenced by the type of relation expressed by the connective (temporal vs. causal). Neither input frequency (frequency-based account), nor clause order (syntax account) or working memory (capacity-constrained account) provided a good fit to the data. Our findings thus contribute to the development of more sophisticated models of sentence processing. We conclude that such models must also take into account how children's emerging linguistic understanding interacts with developments in other cognitive domains such as their ability to construct mental models and reason flexibly about them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forms of one-to-one and iconic concatenation biases are widely attested in natural language.
“These response patterns can be compared to biases in language acquisition more generally; indeed, forms of one-to-one27 and iconic concatenation28,29 are widely attested in natural language.”
From Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
Dienes, Z. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 · Cited by 1,998
Halekoh, U., & Højsgaard, S. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i09 · Cited by 1,324 · cited 1×
“We used the R packages lmerTest (Kuznetsova, Brockhoff, & Bojesen Christensen, 2016) and pbkrtest (Halekoh & Højsgaard, 2014) for the calculation of p-values for lmer models.”
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
Dienes, Z. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406920 · Cited by 938 · cited 2×
“A correction for multiple comparisons is not necessary for Bayesian t-tests (Dienes, 2011).”
The Acquisition of Complex Sentences
Diessel, H. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511486531 · Cited by 651
About the Distinction between Working Memory and Short-Term Memory
Aben, B., Stapert, S., & Blokland, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00301 · Cited by 275
Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960601155284 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Amidon, 1976, Children’s understanding of sentences with contingent relations: Why are temporal and conditional connectives so difficult?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 423, 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90106-5 · DOI
- Amidon, 1972, Why five-year-olds cannot understand before and after, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 417, 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80022-7 · DOI
- Baayen, 2008, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. Retrieved from <http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967>. · arXiv
- Bates, 2015, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
- Bloom, 1987, Sources of meaning in the acquisition of complex syntax: The sample case of causality, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 112, 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90054-3 · DOI
- Blything, 2016, Children’s processing and comprehension of complex sentences containing temporal connectives: The influence of memory on the time course of accurate responses, Developmental Psychology, 52, 1517, 10.1037/dev0000201 · DOI
- Blything, 2015, Young children’s comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: The influence of memory on performance, Child Development, 86, 1922, 10.1111/cdev.12412 · DOI
- Brandt, 2009, The discourse bases of relativization: an investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses, Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 539, 10.1515/COGL.2009.024 · DOI · Paper page
- Carni, 1984, The acquisition of before and after reconsidered: what develops?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 394, 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90011-0 · DOI
- Clark, 1971, On the acquisition of the meaning of “before” and “after”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 266, 10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80054-3 · DOI
- Clark, 1968, Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 129, 10.1080/14640746808400141 · DOI
- Corrigan, 1975, A scalogram analysis of the development of the use and comprehension of “because” in children, Child Development, 46, 195, 10.2307/1128848 · DOI
- Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2000). Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order. In Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions (pp. 111–142).
- De Villiers, 2007, The interface of language and theory of mind, Lingua, 117, 1858, 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Diessel, 2001, The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: a typological study, Language, 77, 433, 10.1353/lan.2001.0152 · DOI
- Diessel, 2005, Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses, Linguistics, 43, 449, 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449 · DOI
- Diessel, 2008, Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English, Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 465, 10.1515/COGL.2008.018 · DOI
- Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In P. Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (pp. 21–52). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209493_Introduction. · DOI
- Eager, C., & Roy, J. (2017). Mixed effects models are sometimes terrible. Retrieved from <http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04858>. · arXiv
- Emerson, 1979, Children’s comprehension of “because” in reversible and non-reversible sentences, Journal of Child Language, 6, 279, 10.1017/S0305000900002300 · DOI
- Emerson, 1980, Children’s judgements of correct and reversed sentences with “if”, Journal of Child Language, 7, 137, 10.1017/S0305000900007078 · DOI
- Emerson, 1980, Development of comprehension of sentences with “because” or “if”, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 202, 10.1016/0022-0965(80)90016-8 · DOI
- Evers-Vermeul, 2011, Discovering domains – On the acquisition of causal connectives, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1645, 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.015 · DOI
- Feagans, 1980, Children’s understanding of some temporal terms denoting order, duration, and simultaneity, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 41, 10.1007/BF01067301 · DOI
- Ford, 1986, Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English, On Conditionals, 353, 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019 · DOI
- French, 1977, Comprehension of “before” and “after” in logical and arbitrary sequences, Journal of Child Language, 4, 247, 10.1017/S0305000900001641 · DOI
- Gerstadt, 1994, The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1/2- 7 years old on a stroop- like day-night test, Cognition, 53, 129, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X · DOI · Paper page
- Gorrell, 1989, Contextual information and temporal terms, Journal of Child Language, 16, 623, 10.1017/S0305000900010758 · DOI
- Grimm, 2011, Vol. 43
- Haviland, 1974, What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512, 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4 · DOI
- Hawkins, 1990, A parsing theory of word order universals, Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 223
- Hawkins, 1994, Vol. 73
- Irwin, 1980, The effects of explicitness and clause order on the comprehension of reversible causal relationships, Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 477, 10.2307/747275 · DOI
- Johnson, 1975, The meaning of before and after for preschool children, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 88, 10.1016/0022-0965(75)90151-4 · DOI
- Johnson, 1980, Children’s judgment and recall of causal connectives: A developmental study of “because”, “so”, and “and”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 243, 10.1007/BF01067240 · DOI
- Junge, 2015, Given–new/new–given? Children’s sensitivity to the ordering of information in complex sentences, Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 589, 10.1017/S0142716413000350 · DOI
- Just, 1992, A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 99, 122, 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
- Keller-Cohen, 1987, Context and strategy in acquiring temporal connectives, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 165, 10.1007/BF01072000 · DOI
- Kidd, 2013, The role of verbal working memory in children’s sentence comprehension: a critical review, Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 208, 10.1097/TLD.0b013e31829d623e · DOI
- Kuhn, 1976, The development of children’s comprehension of causal direction, Child Development, 47, 248, 10.2307/1128307 · DOI
- Lohse, 2015, The development of reasoning about the temporal and causal relations among past, present, and future events, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 54, 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.008 · DOI
- Magimairaj, 2012, Children’s verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 669, 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0111) · DOI
- McCormack, 2011, Children’s reasoning about the temporal order of past and future events, Cognitive Development, 26, 299, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.10.001 · DOI
- Montgomery, 2008, Role of working memory in typically developing children’s complex sentence comprehension, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 331, 10.1007/s10936-008-9077-z · DOI
- Morey, 2011, Bayes Factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses, Psychological Methods, 16, 406, 10.1037/a0024377 · DOI
- Morey, 2014, Simple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis tests, Statistics and Probability Letters, 92, 121, 10.1016/j.spl.2014.05.010 · DOI
- Münte, 1998, When temporal terms belie conceptual order, Nature, 395, 71, 10.1038/25731 · DOI
- Pyykönen, 2003, Sentence structure, temporal order and linearity: slow emergence of adult-like syntactic performance in Finnish, SKY Journal of Linguistics, 16, 113
- Rankin, 2013, The temporal priority principle: At what age does this develop, Frontiers in Psychology, 4
- Rouder, 2009, Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225, 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225 · DOI · Paper page
- Stevenson, 1987, The acquisition of temporal terms, Journal of Child Language, 14, 533, 10.1017/S0305000900010278 · DOI
- Sweetser, 1990, From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, Cambridge University Press
- Trosborg, 1982, Children’s comprehension of “before” and “after” reinvestigated, Journal of Child Language, 9, 381, 10.1017/S0305000900004773 · DOI
- Wetzels, 2011, Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291, 10.1177/1745691611406923 · DOI · Paper page
- White, 2017, The relationship between executive functioning and language: examining vocabulary, syntax, and language learning in preschoolers attending Head Start, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 16, 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.010 · DOI
- Zelazo, 2006, The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): a method of assessing executive function in children, Nature Protocols, 1, 297, 10.1038/nprot.2006.46 · DOI · Paper page
- Zufferey, 2015, A cross-linguistic perspective on the acquisition of causal connectives and relations, International Review of Pragmatics, 7, 22, 10.1163/18773109-00701002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network
Lake, B. M., & Baroni, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ruiter, L. E., Theakston, A. L., Brandt, S., & Lieven, E. V. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 202-224
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2763330617
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Centre for Language and Communicative Development
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L008955/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- sentence comprehension, complex sentences, adverbial clauses, iconicity, children's language development, clause order, input frequency, working memory, connectives, individual differences, mental models, image selection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Psycholinguistics, Semantics, Speech Perception, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review