Cited by 87Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Sensitivity to pain expectations: A Bayesian model of individual differences

Open access
Hoskin, R., Berzuini, C., Acosta-Kane, D., El-Deredy, W., Guo, H., Talmi, D.·2019·Cognition

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The thoughts and feelings people have about pain (referred to as 'pain expectations') are known to alter the perception of pain. However little is known about the cognitive processes that underpin pain expectations, or what drives the differing effect that pain expectations have between individuals. This paper details the testing of a model of pain perception which formalises the response to pain in terms of a Bayesian prior-to-posterior updating process. Using data acquired from a short and deception-free predictive cue task, it was found that this Bayesian model predicted ratings of pain better than other, simpler models. At the group level, the results confirmed two core predictions of predictive coding; that expectation alters perception, and that increased uncertainty in the expectation reduces its impact on perception. The addition of parameters relating to trait differences in pain expectation improved the fit of the model, suggesting that such traits play a significant role in perception above and beyond the influence of expectations triggered by predictive cues. When the model parameters were allowed to vary by participant, the model's fit improved further. This final model produced a characterisation of each individual's sensitivity to pain expectations. This model is relevant for the understanding of the cognitive basis of pain expectations and could potentially act as a useful tool for guiding patient stratification and clinical experimentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.022

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretical models of the influence of expectation on perception refer to the instantaneous perceptual response to a sensory stimulus.

    “Theoretical models of the influence of expectation on perception refers to the instantaneous perceptual response to a sensory stimulus10,22.”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Individual differences account for variation in pain expectation effects on pain experience.

    “It was important to consider individual differences here especially because we previously showed that they account for variation in pain expectation effects on pain experience22.”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoskin, R., Berzuini, C., Acosta-Kane, D., El-Deredy, W., Guo, H., & Talmi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Talmi, D.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
182
Pages
127-139
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951773365
Cited by
87
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I010424/1)
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FB0008, 1161378)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
pain anticipation, pain perception, Bayesian model, predictive coding, individual differences, trait differences, predictive cues, uncertainty, patient stratification
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bayes Theorem, Cues, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Models, Psychological, Uncertainty, Young Adult, Pain Perception, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review