Cited by 165Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

Uncertainty increases pain: evidence for a novel mechanism of pain modulation involving the periaqueductal gray

Open access
Yoshida, Wako, Seymour, Ben, Koltzenburg, Martin, Dolan, Raymond J.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Predictions about sensory input exert a dominant effect on what we perceive, and this is particularly true for the experience of pain. However, it remains unclear what component of prediction, from an information-theoretic perspective, controls this effect. We used a vicarious pain observation paradigm to study how the underlying statistics of predictive information modulate experience. Subjects observed judgments that a group of people made to a painful thermal stimulus, before receiving the same stimulus themselves. We show that the mean observed rating exerted a strong assimilative effect on subjective pain. In addition, we show that observed uncertainty had a specific and potent hyperalgesic effect. Using computational functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that this effect correlated with activity in the periaqueductal gray. Our results provide evidence for a novel form of cognitive hyperalgesia relating to perceptual uncertainty, induced here by vicarious observation, with control mediated by the brainstem pain modulatory system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4984-12.2013

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The basic psychological mechanisms underlying the formation of negative expectations and nocebo effects are anticipation of and information about negative outcomes, prior lack of therapeutic effectiveness, and observation of other patients' pain worsening.

    “The basic psychological mechanisms underlying the formation of negative expectations and thus, nocebo effects, are anticipation of and information about negative outcomes,34,76 prior lack of therapeutic effectiveness,33,34 and observation of other patients' pain worsening.42,60,74,77,78”
  • In a study of 97 women exposed to either a nocebo condition or control condition through observing a video portraying a female model, results demonstrated a significant difference in pain ratings as an effect of group condition and also as an effect of ointment applications within each condition.

    “Results demonstrated a significant difference in the pain ratings as an effect of group condition, and also as an effect of ointment applications within each condition.”
  • In this study, nocebo responses were correlated with hypochondriacal trepidations as well as somatic complaints in the control condition group but not in the nocebo group.

    “In this study, nocebo responses were correlated with hypochondriacal trepidations as well as somatic complaints in the control condition group but not in the nocebo group.78”
  • Ratings of pain were higher in the nocebo condition than in the control condition, suggesting a potentiated perception of pain related to social observation.

    “Furthermore, ratings of pain were higher in the nocebo condition than that in the control condition, which suggests a potentiated perception of pain related to the social observation.”
  • Women within both the nocebo and control conditions reported more pain with application of the ointment.

    “Women within both the nocebo and control conditions reported more pain with application of the ointment.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fields HL Flor H Kalso E Dostrovsky JO A motivation-decision model of pain: the role of opioids 2006 449 459 Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Pain IASP Press Seattle

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshida, W., Seymour, B., Koltzenburg, M., & Dolan, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
33
Issue
13
Pages
5638-5646
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2085014216
Cited by
165
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (091593, 078865/Z/05/Z, 078865, 098362, 098362/Z/12/Z, 091593/Z/10/Z)
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K000608/1, MR/K015222/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain perception, uncertainty, periaqueductal gray, predictive information, assimilation, thermal pain
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Oxygen, Pain, Pain Measurement, Periaqueductal Gray, Physical Stimulation, Pain Threshold, Uncertainty, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review