Cited by 323Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

What makes distributed practice effective?

Open access
Benjamin, Aaron S., Tullis, Jonathan·2010·Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

The advantages provided to memory by the distribution of multiple practice or study opportunities are among the most powerful effects in memory research. In this paper, we critically review the class of theories that presume contextual or encoding variability as the sole basis for the advantages of distributed practice, and recommend an alternative approach based on the idea that some study events remind learners of other study events. Encoding variability theory encounters serious challenges in two important phenomena that we review here: superadditivity and nonmonotonicity. The bottleneck in such theories lies in the assumption that mnemonic benefits arise from the increasing independence, rather than interdependence, of study opportunities. The reminding model accounts for many basic results in the literature on distributed practice, readily handles data that are problematic for encoding variability theories, including superadditivity and nonmonotonicity, and provides a unified theoretical framework for understanding the effects of repetition and the effects of associative relationships on memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated practice over multiple short, temporally-spaced learning sessions yields better and more enduring memory than repeated practice in a single, long learning session (the spacing effect).

    “Regarding spaced practice, several studies have shown that repeated practice taking place over multiple, short, temporally-spaced learning sessions (spaced practice) yields better and more enduring memory than repeated practice occurring in a single, long learning session (massed practice), a difference referred to as the spacing effect (review by Benjamin & Tullis, 2010).”

    From The benefits of successive relearning on multiple learning outcomes. (2022) · cites this paper as Benjamin & Tullis, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Bäuml K 1997 The list-strength effect: Strength-dependent competition or suppression? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 260 264 21331835
  2. Begg I Green C 1988 Repetition and trace interaction: Superadditivity Memory & Cognition 16 232 242 3393084
  3. Benjamin AS Ross BH Benjamin AS in press The causes and consequences of reminding Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork New York, NY Psychology Press
  4. Bjork RA Gruneberg MM Morris PE Sykes RN 1988 Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues 396 401 Chichester UK Wiley
  5. Bower GH 1972 Cognition in learning and memory Oxford, England John Wiley & Sons
  6. Bruce D Weaver GE 1973 Retroactive facilitation in short-term retention of minimally learned paired associates Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 9 17
  7. Challis BH 1993 Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend upon level of processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 19 389 396
  8. Ebbinghaus H 1964 Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology New York Dover Original work published 1885 PMC4117135 25206041
  9. Estes WK 1955a Statistical theory of spontaneous regression and recovery Psychological Review 62 145 154 14371893
  10. Glanzer M 1969 Distance between related words in free recall: Trace of the STS Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8 105 111
  11. Glenberg AM 1976 Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15 1 16
  12. Greene RL 1989 Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 15 371 377
  13. Hintzman DL Solso RL 1974 Theoretical implications of the spacing effect Theories in cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium 77 99 Potomac MD Erlbaum
  14. Hintzman DL 1988 Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model Psychological Review 95 528 551
  15. Hintzman DL 2004 Judgment of frequency vs. recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding Memory & Cognition 32 336 350 15190724
  16. Hintzman DL in press How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency Memory & Cognition 19966243
  17. Hintzman DL Block RA 1973 Memory for the spacing of repetitions Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 70 74
  18. Hintzman DL Block RA Summers JJ 1973 Contextual associations and memory for serial position Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 220 229
  19. Hintzman DL Rogers MK 1973 Spacing effects in picture memory Memory and Cognition 1 430 434 24214636
  20. Hintzman DL Summers JJ Block RA 1975 Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1 31 40
  21. Howard MW Kahana MJ 2002 A distributed representation of temporal context Journal of Mathematical Psychology 46 269 299
  22. Howard MW Kahana MJ Wingfield A 2006 Aging and contextual binding: Modeling recency and lag-recency effects with the temporal context model Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 439 445 17048728 PMC1764618
  23. Krug D Davis B Glover JA 1990 Massed versus distrubted repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology 82 366 371
  24. Landauer TK Bjork RA Gruneberg MM Morris PE Sykes RN 1978 Optimal rehearsal patterns and name learning Practical aspects of memory 625 632 London Academic Press
  25. Lee TD Genovese ED 1988 Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 59 277 87 2489826
  26. Logan JM Balota DA 2008 Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 15 257 280 18421627
  27. Madigan SA 1969 Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8 828 835
  28. Melton AW 1967 Repetition and retrieval from memory Science 158 532 17749105
  29. Melton AW 1970 The Situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and Memory Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9 596 606
  30. Mozer MC Pashler H Cepeda N Lindsey R Vul E Bengio Y Schuurmans D Lafferty J Williams CKI Culotta A 2009 Predicting the optimal spacing of study: A multiscale context model of memory Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 1321 1329 La Jolla, CA NIPS Foundation
  31. Paivio A 1974 Spacing of repetitions in the incidental and intentional free recall of pictures and words Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 497 511
  32. Pavlik PI Anderson JR 2005 Practice and forgetting effect on vocabulary memory: An activation-based model of the spacing effect Cognitive Science 29 559 586 21702785
  33. Peterson LR Hillner K Saltzman D 1962 Time between pairings and short-term retention Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 550 551 13942780
  34. Peterson LR Wampler R Kirkpatrick M Saltzman D 1963 Effect of Spacing Presentations on Retention of a Paired Associate Over Short Intervals Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 206 209 13942778
  35. Raaijmakers JGW Shiffrin RM Bower GH 1980 SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 14 New York Academic Press
  36. Raaijmakers JGW Shiffrin RM 1981 Search of associative memory Psychological Review 88 93 134
  37. Ratcliff R Clark SE Shiffrin RM 1990 List-Strength effect: I. Data and discussion Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 163 178 2137859
  38. Ross BH Landauer TK 1978 Memory for at least one of two items: Test and failure of several theories of spacing effects Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17 669 680
  39. Russo R Parkin AJ Taylor SR Wilks J 1998 Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 161 172 9438957
  40. Shiffrin RM Steyvers M Oaksford M Chater N 1998 The effectiveness of retrieval from memory Rational models of cognition 73 95 Oxford Oxford University Press
  41. Thios SJ 1972 Memory for words in repeated sentences Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11 789 793
  42. Underwood BJ 1957 Interference and forgetting Psychological Review 64 49 60 13408394
  43. Watkins MJ Kerkar SP 1985 Recall of twice-presented item without recall of either presentation: Generic memory for events Journal of Memory and Language 24 666 678
  44. Waugh NC 1963 Immediate memory as a function of repetition Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2 107 112
  45. Wickelgren WA 1972 Trace resistance and the decay of long-term memory Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9 418 455

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Benjamin, Aaron S.
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
228-247
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971300355
Cited by
323
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG026263)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
distributed practice, superadditivity, non-monotonicity, repetition effects, associative relationships
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review