Cited by 57Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex

Open access
Nelson, S. M., Arnold, K. M., Gilmore, A. W., McDermott, K. B.·2013·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Testing, or retrieval practice, is beneficial for long-term memory both directly, by enhancing performance on tested information, and indirectly, by facilitating learning from subsequent encounters with the information. Although a wealth of behavioral research has examined the "testing effect," neuroimaging has provided little insight regarding the potential mechanisms that underlie the benefits of retrieval practice. Here, fMRI was used to examine the effects of retrieval practice on later study trials. Human subjects studied pairs of associated words, which were then tested, restudied, or neither tested nor restudied. All pairs were then studied once more in expectation of a final test. We asked how this Final Study episode was affected by prior history (whether the pair had been previously tested, restudied, or neither). The data revealed striking similarities between responses in lateral parietal cortex in the present study and those in a host of studies explicitly tapping recognition memory processes. Moreover, activity in lateral parietal cortex during Final Study was correlated with a behavioral index of test-potentiated learning. We conclude that retrieval practice may enhance learning by promoting the recruitment of retrieval mechanisms during subsequent study opportunities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0960-13.2013

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parietal cortex activations during the encoding of test-effect paradigms have consistently been correlated with successful long-term retention.

    “Parietal cortex activations during the encoding of test-effect paradigms have consistently been correlated with successful long-term retention (Eriksson et al., 2011; Nelson et al., 2013; Van den Broek et al., 2013; Wing et al., 2013; Keresztes et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014;”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2013

    The section ‘Neural activity in left pIPL/dorsal AG is correlated with “new learning”’ (page unavailable) reports a significant correlation between parietal activity during Final Study and later recall of items missed on the initial test. It also says the correlation was absent for the other item conditions. Thus the paper supports a specific encoding–recall association, but not an unqualified claim that parietal activations were consistently correlated with successful long-term retention. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The brain mechanisms of the testing effect have been examined during encoding or the learning of material.

    “The brain mechanisms of the testing effect have been examined during encoding or the learning of material (Nelson et al., 2013), but the brain basis of the testing”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2013

  • Posterior parietal cortex activations have consistently been observed during similar studies of the testing effect during encoding and retrieval.

    “Posterior parietal cortex activations have consistently been observed during similar studies of the testing effect during encoding (Eriksson et al., 2011; Nelson et al., 2013; Wing et al., 2013; Van den Broek et al., 2013; Keresztes et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Vestergren and Nyberg, 2014; Wirebring et al., 2015) and retrieval (Keresztes et al., 2014; Wirebring et al., 2015).”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Craik FMI, Tulving E (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 82:472-481.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, S. M., Arnold, K. M., Gilmore, A. W., & McDermott, K. B.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
29
Pages
11754-11762
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2043174078
Cited by
57
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1143954)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retrieval practice, testing effect, lateral parietal cortex, recognition memory, long-term memory, restudy, word pair learning, neural mechanisms of learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review