Cited by 99Social Media in Health EducationEducational Technology in LearningWeb and Library Services

Australian health professions student use of social media

Open access
Usher, Kim, Woods, Cindy, Casella, Evan, Glass, Nel, Wilson, Rhonda, Mayner, Lidia, Jackson, Debra, Brown, Janie +4 more·2014·Collegian

Abstract

Increased bandwidth, broadband network availability and improved functionality have enhanced the accessibility and attractiveness of social media. The use of the Internet by higher education students has markedly increased. Social media are already used widely across the health sector but little is currently known of the use of social media by health profession students in Australia. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to explore health profession students' use of social media and their media preferences for sourcing information. An electronic survey was made available to health profession students at ten participating universities across most Australian states and territories. Respondents were 637 first year students and 451 final year students. The results for first and final year health profession students indicate that online media is the preferred source of information with only 20% of students nominating traditional peer-reviewed journals as a preferred information source. In addition, the results indicate that Facebook usage was high among all students while use of other types of social media such as Twitter remains comparatively low. As health profession students engage regularly with social media, and this use is likely to grow rather than diminish, educational institutions are challenged to consider the use of social media as a validated platform for learning and teaching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colegn.2014.02.004

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies on healthcare students, mostly in Western and Westernized countries, showed the importance of implementing guidelines on professional social media use, but a limited number of studies targeted all categories of healthcare students.

    “Some studies on healthcare students [21, 22], the majority of which done in Western and Westernized countries, showed the importance of implementing guidelines on the professional use of social media, but a limited number of studies [23–25] targeted all categories of healthcare students.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Usher, K., Woods, C., Casella, E., Glass, N., Wilson, R., Mayner, L., Jackson, D., Brown, J., Duffy, E., Mather, C., Cummings, E., & Irwin, P.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Usher, Kim
  • Casella, Evan
  • Glass, Nel
  • Jackson, Debra
  • Brown, Janie
  • Duffy, Elaine
  • Mather, Carey
  • Cummings, Elizabeth
  • Irwin, Pauletta
Venue
Collegian
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
95-101
ISSN
1322-7696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147130610
Cited by
99
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (acceptedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
Keywords
social media use, health professions students, Facebook, Twitter, online learning, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Publications, Radio, Students, Health Occupations, Television, Information Dissemination, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review