Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance

Liu, Su-Houn, Liao, Hsiu-Li, Pratt, Jean A.·2009·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Agarwal, 1999, Are individual differences germane to acceptance of new information technologies?, Decision Sciences, 30, 361, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Al-Gahtani, 1999, Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology, Behaviour and Information Technology, 18, 277, 10.1080/014492999119020 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brown, 2006, Learning from a distance, Journal of Property Management, 71, 42
  4. Cappel, 2004, Evaluating e-learning: A case study, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44, 49
  5. Clark, 1991, When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media, Educational Technology
  6. Davis, 1993, User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts, International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 38, 475, 10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Davis, 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ghani, 1994, Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction, The Journal of Psychology, 128, 381, 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Huang, 2005, The acceptance of women-centric websites, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45, 75
  10. Jieun, 2005, Extending the TAM for a t-commerce, Information and Management, 42, 965, 10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kim, 2005, An exploratory study of factors influencing m-learning success, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 92
  12. Koufaris, 2002, Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behaviour, Information Systems Research, 13, 205, 10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kozma, 1991, Learning with media, Review of Educational Research, 61, 79
  14. Kozma, 1994, The influence of media on learning: The debate continues, School Library Media Research, 22
  15. Liaw, 2008, Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system, Computers and Education, 51, 864, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lim, 2000, The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems, MIS Quarterly, 24, 449, 10.2307/3250969 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lu, 2005, Facilitating conditions, wireless trust and adoption intention, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 17
  18. Mackay, 2006, Blended learning, classroom and e-learning, The Business Review, 5, 82
  19. Matarazzo, 2000, The value of video in work at a distance: Addition or distraction, Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, 339, 10.1080/014492900750000045 · DOI
  20. Ngai, 2007, Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM, Computers and Education, 48, 250, 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Novak, 2000, Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach, Marketing Science, 19, 22, 10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Otondo, 2008, The complexity of richness: Media, message and communication outcomes, Information and Management, 45, 21, 10.1016/j.im.2007.09.003 · DOI
  23. Seyal, 2004, Senior government executives’ use of the Internet: A Bruneian scenario, Behaviour and Information Technology, 23, 197, 10.1080/01449290410001669978 · DOI
  24. Seyal, 2002, Determinants of academic use of the Internet: A structural equation model, Behaviour and Information Technology, 21, 71, 10.1080/01449290210123354 · DOI
  25. Sun, 2007, The design of instructional multimedia in e-learning: A media richness theory-based approach, Computers and Education, 49, 662, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.016 · DOI
  26. Timmerman, 2006, Computer-assisted instruction, media richness, and college student performance, Communication Education, 55, 73
  27. Venkatesh, 2002, User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model, Decision Sciences, 33, 297, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x · DOI
  28. Webster, 1993, The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human–computer interaction, Computer and Human Behaviour, 9, 411, 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N · DOI · Paper page
  29. Weiser, 1999, Using video streaming on the Internet for a graduate IT course: A case study, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 39, 38, 10.1080/08874417.1999.11647404 · DOI
  30. Yeung, 2004, Gaining competitive advantages through a functionality grid for website evaluation, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44, 67
  31. Yi, 2005, How individual differences influence technology usage behaviour? Toward an integrated framework, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 52

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, S.-H., Liao, H.-L., & Pratt, J. A.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
599-607
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
OpenAlex
W2143403090
Cited by
586
References
6
FWCI
71.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.