Cited by 28Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Perceived and experienced stigma in first-episode psychosis: A 1-year follow-up study

Open access
Simonsen, Carmen, Aminoff, Sofie R., Vaskinn, Anja, Barrett, Elizabeth A., Faerden, Ann, Ueland, Torill, Andreassen, Ole A., Romm, Kristin Lie +1 more·2019·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Perceived/experienced stigma and its relationship with clinical outcome were investigated across the first year of treatment in a large sample with first-episode psychosis (FEP). METHODS: FEP participants (n=112) in the TOP study were investigated at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Perceived/experienced stigma was measured with items from the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), assessing problems because of barriers and hindrances, and living with dignity because of attitudes and actions of others. Clinical outcome included: symptoms, global functioning, self-rated disability and self-rated life satisfaction. RESULTS: In the total sample, 46% perceived/experienced stigma at baseline, which decreased significantly to 32% at 1-year follow-up. Perceived/experienced stigma was present in 1/5 at both time-points (Sustained stigma), in 2/5 at only one time-point (Transient stigma), and in 2/5 it was not present at either time-point (No stigma). Compared to the No stigma group, the Sustained stigma group had significantly higher levels of positive, excited and depressive symptoms and self-rated disability, as well as lower levels of global functioning and life satisfaction at 1year follow-up, while the Transient stigma group only had poorer functioning and higher self-rated disability. Yet the outcome variables improved across the first year of treatment in all three stigma groups. CONCLUSION: Perceived/experienced stigma was common in FEP, yet the rate decreased across the first year of treatment. Although there was some clinical improvement across the first year of treatment irrespective of stigma, stigma was related to poorer clinical outcome in a bidirectional manner. This suggests that perceived/experienced stigma is an important target in the early stages of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152134

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceived stigma has been related to delayed treatment seeking.

    “Perceived stigma has also been related to delayed treatment seeking (Mueser et al., 2020, Simonsen et al., 2019), as was also replicated in our study where patients and career described stigma as a cause for delay in seeking treatment.”

    From Qualitative study to explore the perspectives and mental health experiences of first episode psychosis patients and their caregivers in North India (2024) · cites this paper as Simonsen et al., 2019

    The Introduction states that stigma is associated with reduced help-seeking and longer pathways to care, which supports the general link to delayed treatment. It does not specifically attribute that link to perceived stigma; the study examines perceived and experienced stigma together and focuses on outcomes after treatment begins. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders: patient edition (SCID-P), version 2. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research; 1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonsen, C., Aminoff, S. R., Vaskinn, A., Barrett, E. A., Faerden, A., Ueland, T., Andreassen, O. A., Romm, K. L., & Melle, I.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Simonsen, Carmen
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
95
Pages
152134
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979485320
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen (_MED_008)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (217776, 223273)
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF (2015-088, 2006258)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
perceived stigma, experienced stigma, first-episode psychosis, clinical outcomes, self-rated disability, global functioning, life satisfaction, early treatment, WHODAS 2.0
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Prognosis, Psychotic Disorders, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review