Cited by 34COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Prior Depression Predicts Greater Stress during COVID-19 Mandatory Lockdown among College Students in France

Open access
Husky, Mathilde M., Kovess-Masfety, Viviane, Gobin-Bourdet, Clara, Swendsen, Joel·2021·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic and its related public health measures such as mandatory lockdowns have been shown to have an impact on mental health. A key question is the role of pre-existing psychiatric disorders in how such measures are experienced. METHODS: During the first country-wide lockdown imposed in France, a Covid-19 module was added to the French portion of the ongoing World Mental Health International college student survey. The present study focuses on respondents who completed the survey during that time frame (n = 291). RESULTS: Students with prior depression endorsed greater increases in anxiety (72.2% vs 50.9%) and stress (72.2% vs 49.4%), as well as greater decreases in concentration (87.0% vs 72.9%) during lockdown as compared to those without depression history. In multivariate analyses, prior depression was associated with overall stress (AOR = 5.50), financial stress (AOR = 1.95), family stress (AOR = 2.47), work related stress (AOR = 5.15), and stress related to loved ones (AOR = 2.21). Prior depression was also associated with greater probability experiencing increased anxiety (AOR = 2.61) and stress (AOR = 2.55) during lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the best predictor of experiencing stress and anxiety during the first Covid-19 lockdown was a history of depression prior to the pandemic outbreak. Implementing public health measures such as mandatory national lockdowns should be accompanied by strategies for reaching out to those who are vulnerable due to a history of mental illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152234

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms influenced the perceived negativity of subsequent stressors.

    “Literature indicated that prior depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms influenced the perceived negativity of subsequent stressors [25]”

    From The Role of Pre-Pandemic Mental Health Status and Personality Traits on Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Lockdown among Italian Young Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (section 1; page unavailable) says prior depression may influence the perceived negativity of subsequent stressors. The multivariate results (section 3.3; page unavailable) associate prior depression with several categories of perceived stress, but prior anxiety only with overall stress. The paper does not report a corresponding finding for somatic symptoms, and these associations do not establish that the symptoms caused the perceptions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husky, M. M., Kovess-Masfety, V., Gobin-Bourdet, C., & Swendsen, J.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Husky, Mathilde M.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
107
Pages
152234
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134682552
Cited by
34
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Agence nationale de la recherche
  • Institut Universitaire de France (ANR-17-36-0013CE-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, university students, stress, anxiety, financial stress, family stress, occupational stress, concentration, mental health, public health measures, vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Communicable Disease Control, Depression, France, Humans, Students, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review