Cited by 6Wood Treatment and PropertiesStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisBamboo properties and applications

Experimental and analytical evaluation of shear capacity of reclaimed timber connections with thermo-mechanically densified wooden dowels

Open access
Derikvand, Mohammad, Khoshroodi, Donya Bazyar·2025·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

The reuse of reclaimed timber in structural applications is increasingly recognized as a strategy to extend material life cycles and reduce waste. Particular attention has recently turned to reusing reclaimed timber in adhesive-free laminated products with wooden dowels, where connection performance is critical. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical performance of double-shear connections assembled from reclaimed spruce timber using thermo-mechanically densified wooden dowels. The dowels were first evaluated in bending and embedment tests on lamellae made from both reclaimed and virgin spruce timber. The shear capacity of the connections was then evaluated in three layups: two homogeneous (all-reclaimed lamellae and all-virgin spruce lamellae) and one hybrid (reclaimed side lamellae with a central virgin spruce lamella). Analytical predictions were performed based on the draft of the new Eurocode 5, however, with two alternative definitions of dowel bending resistance (ultimate moment M u and yield moment M y ), and three alternative definitions of embedment strength ( f h 0.05 d calculated using the 0.05 d offset method, f h F max calculated from F max , and f h 0.8 F max calculated from 0.8 F max ). The three lamellae layups exhibited relatively similar mean capacities (7.3–8.3 kN). The all-reclaimed connections were on average 13 % stronger than the other assemblies, but this was not statistically significant. Among the model input variants, M u with f h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144613

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the absence of codified routes, reused timber faces significant barriers to circulation in mainstream markets, regardless of its demonstrated performance.

    “In the absence of such routes, reused timber faces significant barriers to circulation in mainstream markets, regardless of its demonstrated performance (Derikvand and Khoshroodi 2025).”

    From Reusing timber for a circular, low-carbon future: Challenges and the path forward (2026) · cites this paper as Derikvand and Khoshroodi 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derikvand, M., & Khoshroodi, D. B.
Affiliations
University of Primorska (SI)
Corresponding author
Derikvand, Mohammad
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
504
Pages
144613
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416683801
Cited by
5
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository of the University of Primorsk (University of Primorska) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
  • European Commission (101180622)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Bamboo properties and applications
Keywords
reclaimed timber, wooden dowels, double shear connections, shear capacity, spruce wood, embedment strength, Eurocode 5, empirical design methods, wood reuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review