Cited by 67Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Minding the interpersonal gap: Mindfulness-based interventions in the prevention of ostracism

Open access
Ramsey, Alex T., Jones, Eric E.·2015·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Ostracism is a ubiquitous phenomenon, occurring across a broad range of social contexts and detrimentally impacting personal outcomes. Through enhanced present-moment attention and awareness, mindfulness-based interventions may help prevent this harmful behavior. The current research examined the role of state mindfulness in reducing the propensity to commit ostracism. This relationship was investigated in two studies: a field-based quasi-experiment (Study 1, n=51) and a laboratory-based experiment (Study 2, n=100). Both studies supported the utility of brief mindfulness-based interventions in reducing the propensity to ostracize others. The current studies support the relevance of mindfulness in addressing the substantial problem of ostracism. Among other benefits, fostering mindfulness in a variety of contexts may help reduce personal and social costs associated with this type of incivility. This research represents the first known attempt to utilize a personal resource (mindfulness) to decrease the degree to which individuals ostracize others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2014.10.003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Williams KD Ostracism Annual Review of Psychology 2007 58 425 452 16968209

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, A. T., & Jones, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Calvin University (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Alex T.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
31
Pages
24-34
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015927548
Cited by
67
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (T32 MH019960)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
ostracism, state mindfulness, mindfulness-based interventions, interpersonal aggression, incivility, social exclusion, present-moment awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Awareness, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Distance, Social Isolation, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review