The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aggression as a trait: the Dark Tetrad alternative
Abstract
Aggression is often construed as a unitary trait fully captured by the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Our review of the literature questions that assumption in several respects. Instead of a top-down approach, we argue for a bottom-up conception based on the Dark Tetrad of personality, that is, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism. We highlight research showing that each member of the tetrad responds to different provocations. We conclude that the unitary trait conception of aggression has yielded more confusion than understanding. The term aggression should be reserved for outcomes, with many possible trait×situation predictors. Future research should continue the investigation of moderators as well as cognitive mediators to clarify the triggering of aggression in the individual tetrad members.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“however, under certain conditions of response provocation, narcissistic and Machiavellian individuals are also likely to act aggressively.”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Psychopathy is the strongest predictor of physical and premeditated aggression (13, 24–26);”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452 · Cited by 4,693
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 · Cited by 3,915
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016 · Cited by 919
Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.
Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A. E., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. C. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751 · Cited by 713
Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities
Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414547737 · Cited by 711
The Core of Darkness: Uncovering the Heart of the Dark Triad
Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2012) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1893 · Cited by 681
Behavioral confirmation of everyday Sadism
Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613490749 · Cited by 637
Self-citationTwo replicable suppressor situations in personality research
Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7 · Cited by 631
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–132 of 132
Altruism and Malevolence: Opposite Ends of a Single DimensionPreprint
McAuliffe, W. H. B., McCullough, M. E., & Lieberman, D. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/x3by6
Bogerts, B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63338-0_12
Caino, P. C. G., Herrera, L., & Resett, S. A. (2021) · Psicodebate · doi:10.18682/pd.v21i2.4007 · Cited by 2
Karanlık Üçlü (K3) Ölçeği Geçerlik Çalışmaları-II
BEKİROĞLU, B., & Tatar, A. (2022) · SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL · doi:10.29228/smryj.64979
Karanlık Üçlü (K3) Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi ve İlk Geçerlik Çalışmaları-I
BEKİROĞLU, B., & Tatar, A. (2022) · SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL · doi:10.29228/smryj.63756
Violent and Agressive Behaviour: Are we Defining the Problem Appropriately?
McCurry, A. G. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and Identity · doi:10.33921/oqbm1938
Psychopathie – Was ist eigentlich ein Psychopath?
von Buch, J., Müller, R., & Köhler, D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65520-7_4
The Facial Width-To-Height Ratio is Unrelated to Aggressive Behaviour in Indonesian People
Ananta, M. I., Darmawan, A., Nila, S., & Widayati, K. A. (2023) · HAYATI Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.4308/hjb.30.3.413-420
Editorial: Systemtheorie und Gewalt
Körner, S., Kron, T., & Staller, M. S. (2022) · Soziale Systeme · doi:10.1515/sosys-2022-0001
AYDINLIK ÜÇLÜ ÖLÇEĞI: TÜRKÇE’YE ÇEVİRİ, GÜVENİLİRLİK VE GEÇERLİLİK ÇALIŞMASI
Kazgan, M. H., & TEMELLİ, E. (2023) · the Journal of Academic Social Sciences · doi:10.29228/asos.69199
I want it all and I want it now: Irrational beliefs and dark tetrad traits in men
Volarov, M., Velimirović, M., Kovač, J., Baić, V., & Tovilović, S. (2022) · TIMS Acta · doi:10.5937/timsact16-42201
Qolipur, M., Sadeghi, J., Rezanejad, F., & Soleymanimoghadam, M. (2023) · doi:10.61838/kman.jayps.4.3.15
Exploring the Neural Markers of Aggressive Behavior: Evidence from P300
李, 乐. (2024) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2024.148563
Examining the Relationship Between the Light Triad and the Dark Triad in Terms of Various Variables
Saptır, A. B. (2025) · Journal of Family Counseling and Education · doi:10.32568/jfce.1652162 · Cited by 1
Chen, C., Li, C., Fei, S., & Chen, W. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26747888
Chen, C., Li, C., Fei, S., & Chen, W. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26241349
Chen, C., Li, C., Fei, S., & Chen, W. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26241193
The dark side of residential mobility: The impact of residential mobility on malevolent creativity
Fu, W., Li, S., & Zhong, N. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106166
Individual differences in cyber-harm perpetration: A meta-analysis of personality traits
Barlett, C. P. (2026) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2026.102142
The Relationship between Aggression and Attention—A Meta-Analysis
王, 艺. (2026) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2026.163150
Is It a Southern Thing? Linguistic Stereotyping in Earwitnesses’ Descriptions of Italian Accents
Loiacono, C., & Lagerwerf, L. (2026) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.70044
Vulnerable Online: Identifying Risk Profiles for Recruitment into Online Extremist Groups
Cloudy, J. (2026) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302261454954
Ceballos, N. A., Sweet, R. N., & Westerberg, C. E. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14080176
Greitemeyer, T. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.114058
Unveiling dark preferences: A meta-analytic examination of the Dark Triad and vocational interests
Fezzey, T. N. A., Harms, P. D., Credé, M., & Lowery, N. R. (2026) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2026.104294
Cultural bias or universal traits? Exploring personality-like profiles of large language models
Hang, Y., Soto, C. J., Lignier, B., Ling, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., He, X., & Wu, W. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.252491
Tamura, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1937936
Quansah, J. E., & Gagnon, J. (2026) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2026.2746543
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulhus, D. L., Curtis, S. R., & Jones, D. N.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulhus, Delroy L
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 88-92
- ISSN
- 2352-250X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2609455767
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- aggression, Dark Tetrad, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, cognitive mediators, provocation
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Humans, Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sadism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review