CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Personality Traits and PsychologyBullying, Victimization, and AggressionEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aggression as a trait: the Dark Tetrad alternative

Paulhus, Delroy L, Curtis, Shelby R, Jones, Daniel N·2018·Current Opinion in Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aggression is often construed as a unitary trait fully captured by the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Our review of the literature questions that assumption in several respects. Instead of a top-down approach, we argue for a bottom-up conception based on the Dark Tetrad of personality, that is, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism. We highlight research showing that each member of the tetrad responds to different provocations. We conclude that the unitary trait conception of aggression has yielded more confusion than understanding. The term aggression should be reserved for outcomes, with many possible trait×situation predictors. Future research should continue the investigation of moderators as well as cognitive mediators to clarify the triggering of aggression in the individual tetrad members.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Related

Metadata

Authors
Paulhus, D. L., Curtis, S. R., & Jones, D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Paulhus, Delroy L
ORCID
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Pages
88-92
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
OpenAlex
W2609455767
Cited by
133
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
aggression, Dark Tetrad, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, cognitive mediators, provocation
MeSH terms
Aggression, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Humans, Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sadism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review